Rousou J, Levitsky S, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Cosgrove D, Magilligan D, Weldon C, Hiebert C, Hess P, Joyce L, Bergsland J
University of Illinois, Department of Surgery, Chicago 60680.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Feb;97(2):194-203.
A multicenter study was conducted to test the efficacy and safety of fibrin sealant as a topical hemostatic agent in patients undergoing either reoperative cardiac surgery (redo) or emergency resternotomy. A total of 333 patients from 11 centers in the United States were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to initially receive the fibrin sealant or a conventional topical hemostatic agent when such was required during an operation. The end point used to evaluate the agent's efficacy was local hemostasis, the number of bleeding episodes controlled within 5 minutes. The fibrin sealant group from the prospective study was compared with historical matched control subjects for postoperative blood loss, need for resternotomy, blood products received, and hospital stay. It was also compared with historical nonmatched control subjects for the incidence of resternotomy and mortality. The results showed a 92.6% success rate for fibrin sealant in controlling bleeding within 5 minutes of application, compared with only a 12.4% success rate with conventional topical agents (p less than 0.001). Fibrin sealant also rapidly controlled 82.0% of those bleeding episodes not initially controlled by conventional agents. High-volume postoperative blood loss was significantly less (p less than 0.05) in the fibrin sealant group than in the matched controls. Additionally, resternotomy rates after redo operations were significantly lower in the fibrin sealant group (5.6%) than in the nonmatched historical control group (10%) (p less than 0.0089). There were no significant differences in hospital stay or blood products received between the fibrin sealant group and matched historical controls and no difference in mortality between the fibrin sealant group and nonmatched historical controls. There were no documented instances of adverse reactions, transmission of viral infection (hepatitis B, non-A/non-B hepatitis), or human immunodeficiency virus seroconversion. This study shows that fibrin sealant is safe and highly effective in controlling localized bleeding in cardiac operations. Fibrin sealant reduces postoperative blood loss and decreases the incidence of emergency resternotomy. These findings make fibrin sealant a valuable hemostatic agent in cardiac surgery.
一项多中心研究旨在测试纤维蛋白封闭剂作为局部止血剂在再次心脏手术(redo)或急诊胸骨切开术患者中的疗效和安全性。美国11个中心的333例患者纳入了该研究。患者在手术期间需要时被随机分配,最初接受纤维蛋白封闭剂或传统局部止血剂。用于评估该药物疗效的终点是局部止血,即5分钟内控制的出血发作次数。前瞻性研究中的纤维蛋白封闭剂组与历史匹配对照受试者在术后失血量、再次胸骨切开术的必要性、接受的血液制品以及住院时间方面进行了比较。它还与历史非匹配对照受试者在再次胸骨切开术的发生率和死亡率方面进行了比较。结果显示,纤维蛋白封闭剂在应用后5分钟内控制出血的成功率为92.6%,而传统局部药物的成功率仅为12.4%(p小于0.001)。纤维蛋白封闭剂还迅速控制了82.0%最初未被传统药物控制的出血发作。纤维蛋白封闭剂组的大量术后失血量明显少于匹配对照组(p小于0.05)。此外,再次手术后纤维蛋白封闭剂组的再次胸骨切开术发生率(5.6%)明显低于非匹配历史对照组(10%)(p小于0.0089)。纤维蛋白封闭剂组与匹配历史对照组之间在住院时间或接受的血液制品方面没有显著差异,纤维蛋白封闭剂组与非匹配历史对照组之间在死亡率方面也没有差异。没有记录到不良反应、病毒感染传播(乙型肝炎、非甲非乙型肝炎)或人类免疫缺陷病毒血清转化的实例。这项研究表明,纤维蛋白封闭剂在控制心脏手术中的局部出血方面是安全且高效的。纤维蛋白封闭剂减少了术后失血量并降低了急诊再次胸骨切开术的发生率。这些发现使纤维蛋白封闭剂成为心脏手术中有价值的止血剂。