Suppr超能文献

运用结构方程模型理解处方兴奋剂滥用:三元影响理论的检验

Using structural equation modeling to understand prescription stimulant misuse: a test of the Theory of Triadic Influence.

作者信息

Bavarian Niloofar, Flay Brian R, Ketcham Patricia L, Smit Ellen, Kodama Cathy, Martin Melissa, Saltz Robert F

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, United States.

Oregon State University, United States.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.700. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test a theory-driven model of health behavior to predict the illicit use of prescription stimulants (IUPS) among college students.

PARTICIPANTS

A probability sample of 554 students from one university located in California (response rate=90.52%).

METHODS

Students completed a paper-based survey developed with guidance from the Theory of Triadic Influence. We first assessed normality of measures and checked for multicollinearity. A single structural equation model of frequency of IUPS in college was then tested using constructs from the theory's three streams of influence (i.e., intrapersonal, social situation/context, and sociocultural environment) and four levels of causation (i.e., ultimate causes, distal influences, proximal predictors, and immediate precursors).

RESULTS

Approximately 18% of students reported engaging in IUPS during college, with frequency of use ranging from never to 40 or more times per academic term. The model tested had strong fit and the majority of paths specified within and across streams were significant at the p<0.01 level. Additionally, 46% of the variance in IUPS frequency was explained by the tested model.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest the utility of the TTI as an integrative model of health behavior, specifically in predicting IUPS, and provide insight on the need for multifaceted prevention and intervention efforts.

摘要

目的

检验一个基于理论的健康行为模型,以预测大学生中处方兴奋剂的非法使用情况。

参与者

从加利福尼亚一所大学抽取的554名学生的概率样本(回复率=90.52%)。

方法

学生们完成了一份在三元影响理论指导下编制的纸质调查问卷。我们首先评估了测量指标的正态性并检查了多重共线性。然后,使用该理论的三个影响流(即个人内部、社会情境/背景和社会文化环境)和四个因果水平(即最终原因、远端影响、近端预测因素和直接先兆)中的构念,对大学中处方兴奋剂非法使用频率的单一结构方程模型进行了检验。

结果

约18%的学生报告在大学期间有过处方兴奋剂的非法使用行为,使用频率从从未使用到每学期40次或更多次不等。所检验的模型拟合良好,各影响流内部和之间指定的大多数路径在p<0.01水平上具有显著性。此外,所检验的模型解释了处方兴奋剂非法使用频率46%的方差。

结论

结果表明三元影响理论作为一种健康行为综合模型的效用,特别是在预测处方兴奋剂非法使用方面,并为多方面预防和干预措施的必要性提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Using structural equation modeling to understand prescription stimulant misuse: a test of the Theory of Triadic Influence.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.700. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
2
Illicit use of prescription stimulants in a college student sample: a theory-guided analysis.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):665-73. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 May 16.
3
The Illicit Use of Prescription Stimulants on College Campuses: A Theory-Guided Systematic Review.
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Dec;42(6):719-29. doi: 10.1177/1090198115580576. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Collegiate misuse of prescription stimulants: examining differences in self-worth.
Subst Use Misuse. 2015 Feb;50(3):358-65. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.980956. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
Prescribing Some Criminological Theory: An Examination of the Illicit Use of Prescription Stimulants Among College Students.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Feb;60(2):146-64. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14548530. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
Stress, Drugs, and Alcohol Use Among Health Care Professional Students: A Focus on Prescription Stimulants.
J Pharm Pract. 2015 Dec;28(6):535-42. doi: 10.1177/0897190014544824. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
9
Predictors of Prescription Stimulant Misuse in U.S. College Graduates.
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(4):644-657. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1692867. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Persists and Who Desists? A Prospective Study of Prescription Stimulant Misuse in College Graduates.
J Drug Issues. 2024 Apr;54(2):151-166. doi: 10.1177/00220426231155664. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
3
Prescription stimulant diversion on a college campus: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental correlates.
J Drug Issues. 2020 Jul 1;50(3):329-340. doi: 10.1177/0022042620917103. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Prescription stimulant misuse avoidance self-efficacy: Correlates and moderation by race/ethnicity.
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2020 Jul-Sep;19(3):476-489. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2018.1542370. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Illicit use of prescription stimulants in a college student sample: a theory-guided analysis.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):665-73. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 May 16.
2
Development and psychometric properties of a theory-guided prescription stimulant misuse questionnaire for college students.
Subst Use Misuse. 2013 Apr;48(6):457-69. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.778283. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
Persistent nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among college students: possible association with ADHD symptoms.
J Atten Disord. 2011 Jul;15(5):347-56. doi: 10.1177/1087054710367621. Epub 2010 May 19.
7
Cognitive performance enhancement: misuse or self-treatment?
J Atten Disord. 2011 May;15(4):263-8. doi: 10.1177/1087054710365980. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
8
Nonmedical ADHD stimulant use in fraternities.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Nov;70(6):952-4. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.952.
9
Nonmedical prescription stimulant use among a sample of college students: relationship with psychological variables.
J Atten Disord. 2009 Nov;13(3):284-96. doi: 10.1177/1087054709342212. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
10
Nonmedical use of prescription opioids and stimulants among student pharmacists.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jul-Aug;49(4):519-28. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08027.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验