Suppr超能文献

巴西青光眼的效用值及其与视觉功能的相关性。

Utility values for glaucoma in Brazil and their correlation with visual function.

作者信息

Paletta Guedes Ricardo Augusto, Paletta Guedes Vanessa Maria, Freitas Sirley Maria, Chaoubah Alfredo

机构信息

Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil ; Paletta Guedes Ophthalmological Center, Juiz de Fora, Brazil ; Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

Paletta Guedes Ophthalmological Center, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 12;8:529-35. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S60105. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to identify the utility values in a group of Brazilian patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and to assess its impact on visual acuity (VA) and mean deviation index values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with POAG, who were interviewed using three methods for obtaining utility values: time trade-off (TTO), standard gamble anchored at risk of death (SG1), and standard gamble anchored at risk of blindness (SG2). Visual function variables (VA and mean deviation index in the better eye) and sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race, and educational level) were also obtained for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age (± standard deviation) of the study population (n=227) was 65.7 (±15.1) years. Mean utility values for the entire population were 0.82 from TTO, 0.90 from SG1, and 0.93 from SG2 (P<0.0001). Age, race, and sex had no influence on the utility values. Higher education tended to predict higher values by TTO, but not by SG1 or SG2. Visual function variables had an influence on utility values. The more advanced the visual loss, whether measured by VA or perimetry, in the better eye, the lower the utility values by all three methods.

CONCLUSION

We obtained utility values for Brazilian patients with POAG, as well as specific values for different levels of vision loss.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定一组巴西原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的效用值,并评估其对视力(VA)和平均偏差指数值的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项对连续性POAG患者的横断面研究,采用三种获取效用值的方法对患者进行访谈:时间权衡法(TTO)、以死亡风险为锚定的标准博弈法(SG1)和以失明风险为锚定的标准博弈法(SG2)。还获取了视觉功能变量(较好眼的VA和平均偏差指数)和社会人口学特征(年龄、性别、种族和教育水平)用于统计分析。

结果

研究人群(n = 227)的平均年龄(±标准差)为65.7(±15.1)岁。整个人群的平均效用值TTO法为0.82,SG1法为0.90,SG2法为0.93(P<0.0001)。年龄、种族和性别对效用值无影响。高等教育倾向于预测TTO法得出的较高值,但SG1法或SG2法并非如此。视觉功能变量对效用值有影响。较好眼中,无论通过VA还是视野测量,视觉损失越严重,三种方法得出的效用值越低。

结论

我们得出了巴西POAG患者的效用值,以及不同视力丧失水平的具体值。

相似文献

1
Utility values for glaucoma in Brazil and their correlation with visual function.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 12;8:529-35. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S60105. eCollection 2014.
2
Utility assessment among patients of primary angle closure/glaucoma in China: a preliminary study.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;93(7):871-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.139295. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
3
Utility values among glaucoma patients: an impact on the quality of life.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;89(10):1241-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.068858.
4
A rating scale is a proper method to evaluate changes in quality of life due to dry eye symptoms.
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;39(3):563-569. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0847-9. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Utility values in Singapore Chinese adults with primary open-angle and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
J Glaucoma. 2005 Dec;14(6):455-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000185434.08051.82.
7
Does the type of treatment have an influence on utility values in a glaucoma population?
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 7;9:1645-50. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92653. eCollection 2015.
9
Vision and quality-of-life.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:473-511.
10
Factors associated with vision-related quality of life in Brazilian patients with glaucoma.
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2019 Aug 29;82(6):463-470. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20190089. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of phakic intraocular lens implantation on anxiety and depression in patients with high myopia.
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 19;15(9):107924. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.107924.
2
Management Of Glaucoma In Developing Countries: Challenges And Opportunities For Improvement.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Sep 27;11:591-604. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S218277. eCollection 2019.
3
Time Trade-off Utility Values in Noninfectious Uveitis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
Utility values for glaucoma patients in Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0197581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197581. eCollection 2018.
6
Does the type of treatment have an influence on utility values in a glaucoma population?
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 7;9:1645-50. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92653. eCollection 2015.
7
Utility scores for vesicoureteral reflux and anti-reflux surgery.
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Aug;11(4):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;152(4):515-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.004.
3
Which quality of life score is best for glaucoma patients and why?
BMC Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan 23;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-8-2.
4
Open-angle glaucoma -- an epidemiologic overview.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):166-72. doi: 10.1080/09286580701501931.
5
The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases.
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):898-903.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.008. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis in glaucoma: what drives utility? Results from a pilot study in Sweden.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Jun;84(3):363-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00621.x.
8
The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.
9
Utility values in Singapore Chinese adults with primary open-angle and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
J Glaucoma. 2005 Dec;14(6):455-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000185434.08051.82.
10
Utility values among glaucoma patients: an impact on the quality of life.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;89(10):1241-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.068858.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验