• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: client and family caregiver perspectives.居家护理中安全问题的类型与模式:客户及家庭照顾者的观点
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):214-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw006. Epub 2016 Jan 31.
2
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: staff perspectives.家庭护理中的安全问题的类型和模式:工作人员的观点。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):525-31. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs047. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
3
Informal caregivers of clients with neurological conditions: profiles, patterns and risk factors for distress from a home care prevalence study.患有神经系统疾病患者的非正式照料者:来自一项居家护理患病率研究的特征、模式及困扰的风险因素
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 28;15:350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1010-1.
4
Home care safety perspectives from clients, family members, caregivers and paid providers.客户、家庭成员、护理人员和付费服务提供者对家庭护理安全的看法。
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:97-101. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20720.
5
We share the care: family caregivers' experiences of their older relative receiving home support services.我们共同照顾:家庭照顾者对其年长亲属接受家庭支持服务的体验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Jul;18(4):415-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00913.x. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
6
Home support workers perceptions of family members of their older clients: a qualitative study.居家护理工作者对老年客户家庭成员的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Dec 12;15:165. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0163-4.
7
Ethics and safety in home care: perspectives on home support workers.家庭护理中的伦理与安全:家庭护理工作者的观点
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2014 Mar;27(1):76-96. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2014.23759.
8
From home to 'home': Mapping the caregiver journey in the transition from home care into residential care.从一个“家”到另一个“家”:描绘家庭护理向机构护理过渡过程中照护者的心路历程。
J Aging Stud. 2017 Dec;43:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Needs assessment for home-based care and the strengthening of social support networks: the role of community care workers in rural South Africa.居家护理需求评估与社会支持网络的强化:南非农村社区护理工作者的作用
Glob Health Action. 2015 Dec 18;8:29265. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.29265. eCollection 2015.
10
Predictors of caregiver distress among palliative home care clients in Ontario: evidence based on the interRAI Palliative Care.安大略省姑息治疗居家照护患者照顾者痛苦的预测因素:基于 interRAI 姑息治疗的证据。
Palliat Support Care. 2012 Sep;10(3):155-63. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000824. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Vulnerability and Biological Aging in New York City: An Electronic Health Records-Based Study.纽约市的社会脆弱性与生物衰老:一项基于电子健康记录的研究
J Urban Health. 2025 Apr;102(2):240-249. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00948-7. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
2
Reducing the Burdens of Paid Caregivers of Older Adults by Using Assistive Technology: A Scoping Review.利用辅助技术减轻老年患者有薪照护者的负担:范围综述。
West J Nurs Res. 2024 Apr;46(4):315-326. doi: 10.1177/01939459241234233. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Development of a scale measuring home-visiting nurses' attitudes toward patient safety: a cross-sectional study.一项测量家访护士对患者安全态度的量表的开发:横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 May 6;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01288-8.
4
Risk factors associated with home care safety for older people with dementia: family caregivers' perspectives.与痴呆老年人家庭护理安全相关的风险因素:家庭照顾者的观点。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Apr 7;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03893-3.
5
Concept analysis of patient safety in home care: a hybrid model.居家护理患者安全概念分析:混合模型。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002077.
6
Personal Support Work and Home Care in Ontario during the COVID-19 Pandemic.安大略省在 COVID-19 大流行期间的个人支持工作和家庭护理。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct;18(2):61-75. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26970.
7
Irregular Migrant Workers and Health: A Qualitative Study of Health Status and Access to Healthcare of the Filipino Domestic Workers in Mainland China.非正规移民工人与健康:对中国大陆菲律宾家政工人健康状况及医疗服务可及性的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;10(7):1204. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071204.
8
Attitudes of home-visiting nurses toward risk management of patient safety incidents in Japan.日本上门访视护士对患者安全事件风险管理的态度。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 6;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00905-2.
9
Towards a Better Understanding of the Sense of Safety and Security of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. The Case of the Age-Friendly City of The Hague.迈向更好地理解社区居住的老年人的安全感和保障感。以友好老年城市海牙为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3960. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073960.
10
What constitutes feeling safe at home? A qualitative interview study with frail older people receiving home care.在家感到安全的因素有哪些?一项针对接受居家护理的体弱老年人的定性访谈研究。
Nurs Open. 2020 Sep 13;8(1):191-199. doi: 10.1002/nop2.618. eCollection 2021 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Workers' experiences of crises in the delivery of home support services to older clients: a qualitative study.为老年客户提供居家支持服务时工作人员遭遇危机的经历:一项定性研究。
J Appl Gerontol. 2013 Feb;32(1):31-50. doi: 10.1177/0733464811402198. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
2
Mapping a research agenda for home care safety: perspectives from researchers, providers, and decision makers.制定家庭护理安全研究议程:来自研究人员、提供者和决策者的观点
Can J Aging. 2011 Jun;30(2):233-45. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000055.
3
Identification of serious and reportable events in home care: a Delphi survey to develop consensus.居家护理中严重且需报告事件的识别:一项用于达成共识的德尔菲调查
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26(2):136-43. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu008. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
4
Assessing adverse events among home care clients in three Canadian provinces using chart review.使用图表回顾评估三个加拿大省份的家庭护理客户中的不良事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):989-97. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002039. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
5
The incidence of adverse events among home care patients.居家护理患者不良事件的发生率。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Feb;25(1):16-28. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs075. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
6
Safety in home care: thinking outside the hospital box.居家护理中的安全:跳出医院思维定式
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:68-72. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.22838.
7
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: staff perspectives.家庭护理中的安全问题的类型和模式:工作人员的观点。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):525-31. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs047. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
8
Do models of care designed for terminally ill 'home alone' people improve their end-of-life experience? A patient perspective.专为临终“独居”患者设计的照护模式是否能改善他们的临终体验?从患者角度出发。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Nov;20(6):599-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01074.x. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
9
An analysis of injuries among home health care workers using the Washington state workers' compensation claims database.利用华盛顿州工人赔偿申请数据库对家庭医护人员的伤害情况进行分析。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2010 Apr;29(2):55-74. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2010.493435.
10
Adverse events experienced by homecare patients: a scoping review of the literature.居家患者的不良事件:文献综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Apr;22(2):115-25. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq003. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

居家护理中安全问题的类型与模式:客户及家庭照顾者的观点

Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: client and family caregiver perspectives.

作者信息

Tong Catherine E, Sims-Gould Joanie, Martin-Matthews Anne

机构信息

Centre for Hip Health & Mobility, Vancouver Costal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Centre for Hip Health & Mobility, Vancouver Costal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):214-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw006. Epub 2016 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzw006
PMID:26832159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4833204/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Drawing on interviews with home care clients and their family caregivers, we sought to understand how these individuals conceptualize safety in the provision and receipt of home care, how they promote safety in the home space and how their safety concerns differ from those of home support workers.

DESIGN

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with clients and family caregivers. The analysis included topic and analytical coding of participants' verbatim accounts.

SETTING

Interviews were completed in British Columbia, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Totally 82 clients and 55 caregivers participated.

RESULTS

Clients and family caregivers identified three types of safety concerns: physical, spatial and interpersonal. These concerns are largely multi-dimensional and intersectional. We present a conceptual model of client and caregiver safety concerns. We also examine the factors that intensify and mitigate safety concerns in the home.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of safety concerns, clients and family caregivers overwhelmingly prefer to receive care in the home setting. Spatial and physical concerns are the most salient. The financial burden of creating a safe care space should not be the client's alone to bear. The conceptualization and promotion of safety in home care must recognize the roles, responsibilities and perspectives of all of the actors involved, including workers, clients and their caregivers.

摘要

目的

通过对居家护理客户及其家庭照顾者的访谈,我们试图了解这些人如何在提供和接受居家护理时理解安全,他们如何在家庭空间中促进安全,以及他们的安全担忧与居家支持工作者的安全担忧有何不同。

设计

对客户和家庭照顾者进行了深入的半结构化访谈。分析包括对参与者逐字记录的主题和分析编码。

背景

访谈在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省完成。

参与者

共有82名客户和55名照顾者参与。

结果

客户和家庭照顾者确定了三种安全担忧类型:身体安全、空间安全和人际安全。这些担忧在很大程度上是多维度和交叉性的。我们提出了一个客户和照顾者安全担忧的概念模型。我们还研究了加剧和减轻家庭安全担忧的因素。

结论

尽管存在安全担忧,但客户和家庭照顾者绝大多数还是更喜欢在家中接受护理。空间和身体方面的担忧最为突出。营造安全护理空间的经济负担不应仅由客户承担。居家护理中安全的概念化和促进必须认识到所有相关行为者的角色、责任和观点,包括工作人员、客户及其照顾者。