Holler Judith, Kokal Idil, Toni Ivan, Hagoort Peter, Kelly Spencer D, Özyürek Aslı
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6525EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Psychology Department, Center for Language and Brain, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, 13346 Hamilton, NY, USA, and Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6525EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Psychology Department, Center for Language and Brain, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, 13346 Hamilton, NY, USA, and Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Feb;10(2):255-61. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu047. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Recipients process information from speech and co-speech gestures, but it is currently unknown how this processing is influenced by the presence of other important social cues, especially gaze direction, a marker of communicative intent. Such cues may modulate neural activity in regions associated either with the processing of ostensive cues, such as eye gaze, or with the processing of semantic information, provided by speech and gesture. Participants were scanned (fMRI) while taking part in triadic communication involving two recipients and a speaker. The speaker uttered sentences that were and were not accompanied by complementary iconic gestures. Crucially, the speaker alternated her gaze direction, thus creating two recipient roles: addressed (direct gaze) vs unaddressed (averted gaze) recipient. The comprehension of Speech&Gesture relative to SpeechOnly utterances recruited middle occipital, middle temporal and inferior frontal gyri, bilaterally. The calcarine sulcus and posterior cingulate cortex were sensitive to differences between direct and averted gaze. Most importantly, Speech&Gesture utterances, but not SpeechOnly utterances, produced additional activity in the right middle temporal gyrus when participants were addressed. Marking communicative intent with gaze direction modulates the processing of speech-gesture utterances in cerebral areas typically associated with the semantic processing of multi-modal communicative acts.
接收者会处理来自言语和伴随言语的手势的信息,但目前尚不清楚这种处理是如何受到其他重要社交线索的影响的,尤其是注视方向,它是交际意图的一个标志。这些线索可能会调节与明示线索(如目光注视)处理相关区域或与言语和手势提供的语义信息处理相关区域的神经活动。参与者在参与涉及两名接收者和一名说话者的三方交流时接受扫描(功能磁共振成像)。说话者说出伴有和不伴有互补性象似手势的句子。关键的是,说话者交替她的注视方向,从而创造出两种接收者角色:被关注的(直接注视)与未被关注的(回避注视)接收者。相对于仅言语的话语,对言语与手势的理解在双侧中枕叶、颞中回和额下回有激活。距状沟和后扣带回皮质对直接注视和回避注视之间的差异敏感。最重要的是,当参与者被关注时,言语与手势的话语,而不是仅言语的话语,在右侧颞中回产生了额外的活动。用注视方向标记交际意图会调节大脑中通常与多模态交际行为语义处理相关区域对言语 - 手势话语的处理。