Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症、重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍临床试验中使用的适当认知评估工具的系统评价。

Systematic review of appropriate cognitive assessment instruments used in clinical trials of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.

机构信息

Creativ-Ceutical, 500 Lake Cook Road #350, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, One Takeda Parkway, Deerfield, IL, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2014 May 30;216(3):291-302. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

Abstract

Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a symptom in mental conditions including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BPD). Despite the many available cognitive assessment instruments, consensus is lacking on their appropriate use in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic literature review in Embase, PubMed/Medline and PsychINFO to identify appropriate cognitive function instruments for use in clinical trials of schizophrenia, MDD, and BPD. Instruments were identified from the articles. Instruments and articles were excluded if they did not address schizophrenia, MDD, or BPD. Instrument appropriateness was further assessed by the criteria of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative: test-retest reliability, utility, relationship to functional status, potential changeability to pharmacological agents, and tolerability and practicality for clinical trials. The database search yielded 173 articles describing 150 instruments used to assess cognitive function. Seventeen additional instruments were identified through Google and clinicaltrials.gov. Among all these, only 30 (18%) were deemed appropriate for use in the diseases of interest. Of these, 27 were studied in schizophrenia, one in MDD and two in BPD. These findings suggest the need for careful selection of appropriate cognitive assessment instruments, as not all may be valid in these disorders.

摘要

认知功能障碍越来越被认为是精神疾病的一种症状,包括精神分裂症、重度抑郁症(MDD)和双相情感障碍(BPD)。尽管有许多可用的认知评估工具,但在临床试验中如何适当使用这些工具仍缺乏共识。我们在 Embase、PubMed/Medline 和 PsychINFO 中进行了系统文献回顾,以确定适用于精神分裂症、MDD 和 BPD 临床试验的认知功能测试工具。从文章中确定了工具。如果工具或文章未涉及精神分裂症、MDD 或 BPD,则将其排除在外。根据 Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia(MATRICS)倡议的标准进一步评估工具的适当性:重测信度、实用性、与功能状态的关系、对药物治疗的潜在可变性以及临床试验的耐受性和实用性。数据库搜索产生了 173 篇描述用于评估认知功能的 150 种工具的文章。通过 Google 和 clinicaltrials.gov 还确定了另外 17 种工具。在所有这些工具中,只有 30 种(18%)被认为适用于感兴趣的疾病。其中,27 种在精神分裂症中进行了研究,1 种在 MDD 中进行了研究,2 种在 BPD 中进行了研究。这些发现表明需要仔细选择适当的认知评估工具,因为并非所有工具在这些疾病中都有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验