Suppr超能文献

焦虑症状和焦虑障碍对 STOP-PD 研究中精神病性抑郁症治疗结果的影响差异。

Differential impact of anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders on treatment outcome for psychotic depression in the STOP-PD study.

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Academic Unit of Psychiatry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;55(5):1069-76. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting results on the impact of anxiety on depression outcomes. The impact of anxiety has not been studied in major depression with psychotic features ("psychotic depression").

AIMS

We assessed the impact of specific anxiety symptoms and disorders on the outcomes of psychotic depression.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Study of Pharmacotherapy for Psychotic Depression that randomized 259 younger and older participants to either olanzapine plus placebo or olanzapine plus sertraline. We assessed the impact of specific anxiety symptoms from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ("tension", "anxiety" and "somatic concerns" and a composite anxiety score) and diagnoses (panic disorder and GAD) on psychotic depression outcomes using linear or logistic regression. Age, gender, education and benzodiazepine use (at baseline and end) were included as covariates.

RESULTS

Anxiety symptoms at baseline and anxiety disorder diagnoses differentially impacted outcomes. On adjusted linear regression there was an association between improvement in depressive symptoms and both baseline "tension" (coefficient=0.784; 95% CI: 0.169-1.400; p=0.013) and the composite anxiety score (regression coefficient = 0.348; 95% CI: 0.064-0.632; p=0.017). There was an interaction between "tension" and treatment group, with better responses in those randomized to combination treatment if they had high baseline anxiety scores (coefficient=1.309; 95% CI: 0.105-2.514; p=0.033). In contrast, panic disorder was associated with worse clinical outcomes (coefficient=-3.858; 95% CI: -7.281 to -0.434; p=0.027) regardless of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that analysis of the impact of anxiety on depression outcome needs to differentiate psychic and somatic symptoms.

摘要

背景

焦虑对抑郁症结果的影响存在相互矛盾的结果。具有精神病特征的重度抑郁症(“精神病性抑郁症”)中,尚未研究焦虑的影响。

目的

我们评估了特定焦虑症状和障碍对精神病性抑郁症结局的影响。

方法

我们分析了精神药理学治疗精神病性抑郁症研究的数据,该研究将 259 名年轻和年长的参与者随机分为奥氮平加安慰剂或奥氮平加舍曲林组。我们使用线性或逻辑回归评估了来自Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(“紧张”,“焦虑”和“躯体担忧”以及综合焦虑评分)和诊断(惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍)的特定焦虑症状对精神病性抑郁症结局的影响。年龄、性别、教育程度和苯二氮䓬类药物的使用(基线和结束时)作为协变量。

结果

基线时的焦虑症状和焦虑障碍诊断对结局有不同的影响。在调整后的线性回归中,抑郁症状的改善与基线时的“紧张”(系数=0.784;95%CI:0.169-1.400;p=0.013)和综合焦虑评分(回归系数=0.348;95%CI:0.064-0.632;p=0.017)之间存在关联。“紧张”和治疗组之间存在交互作用,如果基线焦虑评分较高,随机分配到联合治疗的患者反应更好(系数=1.309;95%CI:0.105-2.514;p=0.033)。相比之下,惊恐障碍与更差的临床结局相关(系数=-3.858;95%CI:-7.281 至-0.434;p=0.027),无论治疗如何。

结论

我们的结果表明,分析焦虑对抑郁结局的影响需要区分精神和躯体症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验