Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany; LEAD Graduate School, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jun 30;217(1-2):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.031. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
Facial affect is one of the most important information sources during the course of social interactions, but it is susceptible to distortion due to the complex and dynamic nature. Socially anxious individuals have been shown to exhibit alterations in the processing of social information, such as an attentional and interpretative bias toward threatening information. This may be one of the key factors contributing to the development and maintenance of anxious psychopathology. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether a threat-related interpretation bias is evident for ambiguous facial stimuli in a population of individuals with a generalized Social Anxiety Disorder (gSAD) as compared to healthy controls. Participants judged ambiguous happy/fearful, angry/fearful and angry/happy blends varying in intensity and rated the predominant affective expression. The results obtained in this study do not indicate that gSAD is associated with a biased interpretation of ambiguous facial affect.
面部表情是社交互动过程中最重要的信息来源之一,但由于其复杂和动态的性质,面部表情容易发生扭曲。研究表明,社交焦虑个体在处理社交信息时会表现出改变,例如对威胁信息的注意力和解释偏向。这可能是导致焦虑性精神病理学发展和维持的关键因素之一。本研究的目的是调查在广泛性社交焦虑障碍(gSAD)患者和健康对照组中,是否存在对模糊面部刺激的与威胁相关的解释偏差。参与者判断强度不同的模糊的高兴/恐惧、愤怒/恐惧和愤怒/高兴混合体,并对占主导地位的情感表达进行评级。本研究的结果表明,gSAD 与对模糊面部情感的有偏差的解释无关。