Lakhundi Sahreena, Khan Naveed Ahmed, Siddiqui Ruqaiyyah
Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Exp Parasitol. 2014 Jun;141:122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
The aim of this study was to assess the anti-amoebic effects of marketed contact lens disinfecting solutions. Using amoebistatic, amoebicidal, and cysticidal assays, nine different contact lens solutions were tested including: ReNu MultiPlus, DuraPlus, Ultimate Plus, OptiFree Replenish, OptiFree Express, Kontex Clean, Kontex Normal, Kontex Multisol extra+, Kontex Soak. In vitro growth inhibition (amoebistatic) assays were performed by incubating Acanthamoeba castellanii with aforementioned contact lens disinfection solutions as per manufacturer's instructions in the growth medium for up to 48h at 30°C. To determine amoebicidal and cysticidal effects, amoebae were incubated with contact lens solutions in phosphate buffered saline for 24h and viability was determined by haemocytometer counting as well as re-inoculating them in the growth medium. For controls, solutions were tested against bacterial corneal pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as amoebae were incubated with the solvent alone. Of the nine contact lens solutions tested, none of them showed potent amoebicidal effects. Only DuraPlus and OptiFree Replenish exhibited trophozoite lysis of 85.3% and 73.7% respectively. In contrast, all contact lens disinfection solutions except Kontex Clean, Kontex Normal, Kontex Multisol extra+, tested showed amoebistatic effects. Importantly, none of the contact lens disinfection solutions exhibited cysticidal effects using qualitative assays, i.e., cysts treated with aforementioned solutions re-emerged as viable amoebae upon inoculation in the growth medium. However, more than 3-log reduction was observed when ReNu MultiPlus, DuraPlus and OptiFree Express were tested against P. aeruginosa which is in accordance with the ISO Stand-Alone Primary acceptance criteria. These findings are of great concern for contact lens users.
本研究的目的是评估市售隐形眼镜消毒溶液的抗阿米巴作用。使用抑菌、杀阿米巴和杀包囊试验,对九种不同的隐形眼镜溶液进行了测试,包括:ReNu MultiPlus、DuraPlus、Ultimate Plus、OptiFree Replenish、OptiFree Express、Kontex Clean、Kontex Normal、Kontex Multisol extra+、Kontex Soak。体外生长抑制(抑菌)试验是通过将卡氏棘阿米巴与上述隐形眼镜消毒溶液按照制造商的说明在生长培养基中于30°C孵育长达48小时来进行的。为了确定杀阿米巴和杀包囊效果,将阿米巴与隐形眼镜溶液在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中孵育24小时,并通过血细胞计数器计数以及将它们重新接种到生长培养基中来确定活力。作为对照,对溶液进行了针对细菌性角膜病原体铜绿假单胞菌的测试,并且将阿米巴仅与溶剂孵育。在所测试的九种隐形眼镜溶液中,没有一种显示出有效的杀阿米巴作用。只有DuraPlus和OptiFree Replenish分别表现出85.3%和73.7%的滋养体裂解。相比之下,除了Kontex Clean、Kontex Normal、Kontex Multisol extra+之外,所有测试的隐形眼镜消毒溶液都显示出抑菌作用。重要的是,使用定性试验时,没有一种隐形眼镜消毒溶液表现出杀包囊作用,即,用上述溶液处理过的包囊在接种到生长培养基后重新出现为活的阿米巴。然而,当对ReNu MultiPlus、DuraPlus和OptiFree Express针对铜绿假单胞菌进行测试时,观察到超过3个对数的减少,这符合ISO独立主要验收标准。这些发现令隐形眼镜使用者极为担忧。