• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用德尔菲法设计一种评估和改善肾脏病医疗质量的方法。

Designing a method to assess and improve the quality of healthcare in Nephrology by means of the Delphi technique.

作者信息

Arce José M, Hernando Luis, Ortiz Alberto, Díaz Mónica, Polo Milagros, Lombardo María, Robles Antonio

出版信息

Nefrologia. 2014;34(2):158-74. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.Dec.12286.

DOI:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.Dec.12286
PMID:24658191
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Free choice is not easy when there is a lack of information. Methods for evaluating quality of care to provide patients with comprehensive and understandable information on hospital departments are therefore necessary.

OBJECTIVES

To draft a methodological proposal for evaluating quality of care of hospital departments, the data of which can provide citizens with useful care quality information. The proposal should be based on consensus and on the experience of medical specialists, defining thus complementary paths to improvement.

METHODS

A Delphi study on the quality of care in Nephrology, comprising three phases: assessment results, necessary means for quality, and importance of medical advice and surveys among specialists. The questionnaire was administered to a panel of 32 nephrologists.

RESULTS

The nephrologists accepted the outcome criteria on quality of care 55/62 (89%), as well as the proposed means for quality of care 87/92 (95%). 81% of the nephrologists reported the validity and topicality of providing patients with specialist advice as to the most adequate department to better treat their kidney diseases. 86% of the panellists deemed appropriate to include surveys on medical advice as additional criteria for the evaluation of quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to obtain a consensus-based methodological proposal for the evaluation and improvement of quality of care which includes results on quality of care, means for quality of care, and medical advice based on surveys carried out among specialists to identify the best Nephrology departments. This method could provide reliable and understandable guidance for citizens.

摘要

背景

在缺乏信息时,自由选择并非易事。因此,有必要采用评估医疗质量的方法,以便为患者提供有关医院科室的全面且易懂的信息。

目的

起草一份评估医院科室医疗质量的方法建议,其数据可为市民提供有用的医疗质量信息。该建议应基于共识以及医学专家的经验,从而确定互补的改进途径。

方法

开展一项关于肾脏病学医疗质量的德尔菲研究,包括三个阶段:评估结果、质量所需手段以及专家之间医疗建议和调查的重要性。向32名肾脏病专家组成的小组发放问卷。

结果

肾脏病专家认可医疗质量结果标准的占55/62(89%),认可所提议的医疗质量手段的占87/92(95%)。81%的肾脏病专家报告称,就最适合治疗其肾脏疾病的科室向患者提供专家建议具有有效性和时效性。86%的小组成员认为将医疗建议调查纳入作为评估医疗质量的附加标准是合适的。

结论

有可能获得一份基于共识的评估和改进医疗质量的方法建议,其中包括医疗质量结果、医疗质量手段以及基于对专家进行调查以确定最佳肾脏病科室的医疗建议。这种方法可为市民提供可靠且易懂的指导。

相似文献

1
Designing a method to assess and improve the quality of healthcare in Nephrology by means of the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲法设计一种评估和改善肾脏病医疗质量的方法。
Nefrologia. 2014;34(2):158-74. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.Dec.12286.
2
[Prioritization of performance measures for assessment of hospital-based stroke care quality through a consensus method].[通过共识方法对基于医院的卒中护理质量评估的绩效指标进行优先级排序]
Rev Calid Asist. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Refinement of indicators and criteria in a quality tool for assessing quality in primary care in Canada: a Delphi panel study.加拿大初级保健质量评估质量工具中指标和标准的细化:一项德尔菲小组研究。
Fam Pract. 2014 Oct;31(5):607-21. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu021. Epub 2014 May 21.
4
Development of key performance indicators for emergency departments in Ireland using an electronic modified-Delphi consensus approach.爱尔兰急诊科关键绩效指标的制定:采用电子改良德尔菲共识法。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e5d8.
5
Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Nephrostomy.经皮肾造瘘术质量改进指南
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.045. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Improving care coordination between nephrology and primary care: a quality improvement initiative using the renal physicians association toolkit.改善肾脏病学和初级保健之间的护理协调:使用肾脏病医师协会工具包的质量改进计划。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jan;65(1):67-79. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.031. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
7
Chronic kidney disease in the United States: a public policy imperative.美国的慢性肾脏病:一项公共政策要务。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1902-10. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02330508. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
8
Designing a Method with Physician Participation to Assess and Improve Quality of Healthcare in Otolaryngology.
J Int Adv Otol. 2017 Apr;13(1):128-135. doi: 10.5152/iao.2017.2880.
9
Measuring the quality of renal care: things to keep in mind when selecting and using quality indicators.衡量肾脏护理质量:选择和使用质量指标时需牢记的事项。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Aug;29(8):1460-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft473. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
10
Awareness and implementation in daily practice of the S.E.N.-semFYC consensus document on chronic kidney disease.对慢性肾脏病 S.E.N.-semFYC 共识文件在日常实践中的认知和实施。
Nefrologia. 2012;32(6):797-808. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Sep.11367.

引用本文的文献

1
Thrombotic Microangiopathy in the Renal Allograft: Results of the TMA Banff Working Group Consensus on Pathologic Diagnostic Criteria.移植肾血栓性微血管病:Banff 工作组关于病理诊断标准的共识结果。
Transpl Int. 2023 Aug 23;36:11590. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11590. eCollection 2023.
2
Delphi: A Democratic and Cost-Effective Method of Consensus Generation in Transplantation.德尔菲法:移植领域中一种具有民主性且符合成本效益的共识生成方法。
Transpl Int. 2023 Aug 23;36:11589. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11589. eCollection 2023.
3
Prioritisation of quality indicators for elective perioperative care: a Delphi consensus.
择期围手术期护理质量指标的优先级确定:德尔菲共识
Perioper Med (Lond). 2020 Mar 10;9:8. doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-0138-7. eCollection 2020.
4
Continuous quality improvement in nephrology: a systematic review.肾脏病学的持续质量改进:一项系统综述。
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Nov 24;17(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0389-1.