Department of Pathology, John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Transpl Int. 2023 Aug 23;36:11590. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11590. eCollection 2023.
The Banff community summoned the TMA Banff Working Group to develop minimum diagnostic criteria (MDC) and recommendations for renal transplant TMA (Tx-TMA) diagnosis, which currently lacks standardized criteria. Using the Delphi method for consensus generation, 23 nephropathologists (panelists) with >3 years of diagnostic experience with Tx-TMA were asked to list light, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopic, clinical and laboratory criteria and differential diagnoses for Tx-TMA. Delphi was modified to include 2 validations rounds with histological evaluation of whole slide images of 37 transplant biopsies (28 TMA and 9 non-TMA). Starting with 338 criteria in R1, MDC were narrowed down to 24 in R8 generating 18 pathological, 2 clinical, 4 laboratory criteria, and 8 differential diagnoses. The panelists reached a good level of agreement (70%) on 76% of the validated cases. For the first time in Banff classification, Delphi was used to reach consensus on MDC for Tx-TMA. Phase I of the study (pathology phase) will be used as a model for Phase II (nephrology phase) for consensus regarding clinical and laboratory criteria. Eventually in Phase III (consensus of the consensus groups) and the final MDC for Tx-TMA will be reported to the transplantation community.
班夫社区召集 TMA 班夫工作组制定肾脏移植 TMA(Tx-TMA)诊断的最低诊断标准(MDC)和建议,目前该诊断缺乏标准化标准。使用德尔菲法进行共识生成,我们邀请了 23 名具有 >3 年 Tx-TMA 诊断经验的肾病学家(小组成员)列出 Tx-TMA 的光镜、免疫荧光和电子显微镜、临床和实验室标准以及鉴别诊断。为了包括 37 例移植活检的全切片图像的 2 轮验证(28 例 TMA 和 9 例非 TMA),我们对德尔菲法进行了修改。从 R1 中的 338 个标准开始,MDC 在 R8 中缩小到 24 个,生成了 18 个病理学标准、2 个临床标准、4 个实验室标准和 8 个鉴别诊断。小组成员对 76%的验证病例达成了 76%的一致性(70%)。在班夫分类中,首次使用德尔菲法就 Tx-TMA 的 MDC 达成共识。该研究的第一阶段(病理学阶段)将作为第二阶段(肾脏病学阶段)的模型,以就临床和实验室标准达成共识。最终在第三阶段(共识小组的共识)和最终的 Tx-TMA MDC 将向移植社区报告。