1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr;202(4):W349-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10957.
The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of subtraction color-map images created from contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis in the early stage of acute pancreatitis.
Forty-eight patients underwent unenhanced CT and CECT within 72 hours from the onset of acute pancreatitis. Subtraction color-map images were created from unenhanced CT and CECT using a 3D nonrigid registration method. Three radiologists reviewed two image sets: CECT alone and subtraction color-map images in conjunction with CECT. Readers evaluated each image set for the presence of pancreatic necrosis. The reference standard for pancreatic necrosis was CT or MRI 1 week or more after the onset of acute pancreatitis. The performance of each image set for the prediction of pancreatic necrosis was calculated and compared using the McNemar test.
Eleven of the 48 patients developed pancreatic necrosis. There were no technical failures creating the subtraction images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting pancreatic necrosis with CECT were 64%, 97%, and 90%, respectively, for reader 1; 73%, 87%, and 83% for reader 2; and 73%, 87%, and 83% for reader 3. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting pancreatic necrosis with the subtraction color maps were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for reader 1; 100%, 95%, and 96% for reader 2; and 82%, 92%, and 90% for reader 3. Accuracy significantly improved with the addition of subtraction color maps compared with CECT alone for reader 1 (p = 0.03) and reader 2 (p = 0.02) but not for reader 3 (p = 0.37).
A subtraction color map is accurate in the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis in the early stage of acute pancreatitis.
本研究旨在评估从增强 CT(CECT)和未增强 CT 创建减影彩色图谱图像对急性胰腺炎早期胰腺坏死的诊断准确性。
48 例患者在急性胰腺炎发病后 72 小时内行未增强 CT 和 CECT 检查。使用三维非刚性配准方法从未增强 CT 和 CECT 创建减影彩色图谱。三位放射科医生对两个图像集进行了评估:CECT 单独和 CECT 联合减影彩色图谱。读者评估每个图像集是否存在胰腺坏死。胰腺坏死的参考标准为急性胰腺炎发病后 1 周或更长时间的 CT 或 MRI。使用 McNemar 检验比较两种图像组合对胰腺坏死的预测性能。
48 例患者中 11 例发生胰腺坏死。减影图像创建无技术失败。CECT 预测胰腺坏死的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为读者 1 为 64%、97%和 90%;读者 2 为 73%、87%和 83%;读者 3 为 73%、87%和 83%。使用减影彩色图谱预测胰腺坏死的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为读者 1 为 100%、100%和 100%;读者 2 为 100%、95%和 96%;读者 3 为 82%、92%和 90%。与 CECT 相比,添加减影彩色图谱后,读者 1(p=0.03)和读者 2(p=0.02)的准确性显著提高,但读者 3 (p=0.37)则不然。
减影彩色图谱在诊断急性胰腺炎早期胰腺坏死方面是准确的。