Department of Biology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, 47809, U.S.A.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Feb;90(1):60-76. doi: 10.1111/brv.12093. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Animal-vehicle collisions (AVCs) are a substantial problem in a human-dominated world, but little is known about what goes wrong, from the animal's perspective, when a collision occurs with an automobile, boat, or aircraft. Our goal is to provide insight into reactions of animals to oncoming vehicles when collisions might be imminent. Avoiding a collision requires successful vehicle detection, threat assessment, and evasive behaviour; failures can occur at any of these stages. Vehicle detection seems fairly straightforward in many cases, but depends critically on the sensory capabilities of a given species. Sensory mechanisms for detection of collisions (looming detectors) may be overwhelmed by vehicle speed. Distractions are a likely problem in vehicle detection, but have not been clearly demonstrated in any system beyond human pedestrians. Many animals likely perceive moving vehicles as non-threatening, and may generally be habituated to their presence. Slow or minimal threat assessment is thus a likely failure point in many AVCs, but this is not uniformly evident. Animals generally initiate evasive behaviour when a collision appears imminent, usually employing some aspect of native antipredator behaviour. Across taxa, animals exhibit a variety of behaviours when confronted with oncoming vehicles. Among marine mammals, right whales Eubalaena spp., manatees Trichechus spp., and dugongs Dugong dugon are fairly unresponsive to approaching vehicles, suggesting a problem in threat assessment. Others, such as dolphins Delphinidae, assess vehicle approach at distance. Little work has been conducted on the behavioural aspects of AVCs involving large mammals and automobiles, despite their prevalence. Available observations suggest that birds do not usually treat flying aircraft as a major threat, often allowing close approach before taking evasive action, as they might in response to natural predators. Inappropriate antipredator behaviour (often involving immobility) is a major source of AVCs in amphibians and terrestrial reptiles. Much behavioural work on AVCs remains to be done across a wide variety of taxa. Such work should provide broad phylogenetic generalizations regarding AVCs and insights into managing AVCs.
动物-车辆碰撞(AVC)在人类主导的世界中是一个严重的问题,但从动物的角度来看,当与汽车、船只或飞机发生碰撞时,碰撞中出了什么问题知之甚少。我们的目标是提供动物对迎面而来的车辆的反应的深入了解,当碰撞可能迫在眉睫时。避免碰撞需要成功的车辆检测、威胁评估和逃避行为;失败可能发生在这些阶段的任何一个。在许多情况下,车辆检测似乎相当简单,但这取决于特定物种的感官能力。用于检测碰撞的感官机制(逼近探测器)可能会被车辆速度所压倒。在任何超出人类行人的系统中,分心都可能是车辆检测中的一个问题,但尚未得到明确证明。许多动物可能认为移动的车辆没有威胁,并且可能普遍习惯了它们的存在。因此,在许多 AVC 中,缓慢或最小的威胁评估可能是一个失败点,但这并不普遍。当碰撞似乎迫在眉睫时,动物通常会启动逃避行为,通常采用一些原生捕食者行为。在整个分类群中,动物在面对迎面而来的车辆时表现出各种行为。在海洋哺乳动物中,长须鲸 Eubalaena spp.、海牛 Trichechus spp. 和儒艮 Dugong dugon 对接近的车辆反应相当迟钝,这表明它们在威胁评估方面存在问题。其他动物,如海豚 Delphinidae,则在远处评估车辆的接近程度。尽管大型哺乳动物和汽车与 AVC 有关,但很少有关于 AVC 行为方面的工作。现有的观察表明,鸟类通常不会将飞行的飞机视为主要威胁,通常在采取逃避行动之前允许近距离接近,就像它们可能对自然捕食者做出反应一样。不适当的捕食者防御行为(通常涉及不动)是两栖动物和陆地爬行动物 AVC 的主要来源。在广泛的分类群中,仍有许多关于 AVC 的行为工作要做。这种工作应该提供关于 AVC 的广泛的系统发育概括,并深入了解管理 AVC。