• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Speed kills: ineffective avian escape responses to oncoming vehicles.速度夺命:鸟类对迎面驶来车辆的逃避反应无效。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 22;282(1801):20142188. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2188.
2
Effects of vehicle speed on flight initiation by Turkey vultures: implications for bird-vehicle collisions.车速对土耳其兀鹰飞行起始的影响:对鸟类与车辆碰撞的启示
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087944. eCollection 2014.
3
Animal reactions to oncoming vehicles: a conceptual review.动物对迎面而来的车辆的反应:概念综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Feb;90(1):60-76. doi: 10.1111/brv.12093. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
4
Can we use antipredator behavior theory to predict wildlife responses to high-speed vehicles?我们能否用捕食防御行为理论来预测野生动物对高速行驶车辆的反应?
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0267774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267774. eCollection 2022.
5
Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles.水鸭对驶近车辆的逃避反应无效。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 25;12:e18124. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18124. eCollection 2024.
6
Social information affects Canada goose alert and escape responses to vehicle approach: implications for animal-vehicle collisions.社会信息影响加拿大鹅对车辆靠近的警戒和逃避反应:对动物与车辆碰撞的启示
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 17;7:e8164. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8164. eCollection 2019.
7
Discrimination between host songs by brood parasitic brown-headed cowbirds ( Molothrus ater).巢寄生褐头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)对宿主歌曲的辨别
Anim Cogn. 2002 Sep;5(3):129-37. doi: 10.1007/s10071-002-0143-x. Epub 2002 Sep 3.
8
White-tailed deer response to vehicle approach: evidence of unclear and present danger.白尾鹿对车辆靠近的反应:不明且当前存在危险的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e109988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109988. eCollection 2014.
9
Sex and seasonal differences in hippocampal volume and neurogenesis in brood-parasitic brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).巢寄生褐头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)海马体体积和神经发生的性别及季节性差异。
Dev Neurobiol. 2016 Nov;76(11):1275-1290. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22421. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
European birds adjust their flight initiation distance to road speed limits.欧洲鸟类会根据道路限速调整其起飞距离。
Biol Lett. 2013 Aug 21;9(5):20130417. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0417. Print 2013 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Light tuned to the avian eye elicits early detection and escape from an approaching aircraft.调至适合鸟类眼睛的光线能促使其及早发现并躲避逼近的飞机。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 4;12(6):250047. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250047. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Inefficacy of mallard flight responses to approaching vehicles.水鸭对驶近车辆的逃避反应无效。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 25;12:e18124. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18124. eCollection 2024.
3
Anthropogenic, environmental and temporal associations with vertebrate road mortality in a wildland-urban interface of a biodiverse desert ecoregion.在一个生物多样的沙漠生态区的城乡交错带,人为因素、环境因素以及时间因素与脊椎动物道路死亡之间的关联。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 31;11(7):240439. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240439. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Light wavelength and pulsing frequency affect avoidance responses of Canada geese.光波长和脉冲频率会影响加拿大鹅的回避反应。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 21;11:e16379. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16379. eCollection 2023.
5
Can we use antipredator behavior theory to predict wildlife responses to high-speed vehicles?我们能否用捕食防御行为理论来预测野生动物对高速行驶车辆的反应?
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0267774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267774. eCollection 2022.
6
Responses of turkey vultures to unmanned aircraft systems vary by platform.火鸡秃鹫对无人机系统的反应因平台而异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 4;11(1):21655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01098-5.
7
Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management.利用常识:感官生态学与野生动物保护和管理相结合。
Conserv Physiol. 2021 Mar 29;9(1):coab002. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coab002. eCollection 2021.
8
Social information affects Canada goose alert and escape responses to vehicle approach: implications for animal-vehicle collisions.社会信息影响加拿大鹅对车辆靠近的警戒和逃避反应:对动物与车辆碰撞的启示
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 17;7:e8164. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8164. eCollection 2019.
9
Roads do not increase carrion use by a vertebrate scavenging community.道路并不会增加脊椎动物食腐动物群落对腐肉的利用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34224-x.
10
Assessing bird avoidance of high-contrast lights using a choice test approach: implications for reducing human-induced avian mortality.使用选择测试方法评估鸟类对高对比度灯光的回避:对减少人为导致的鸟类死亡的意义。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 26;6:e5404. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5404. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
White-tailed deer response to vehicle approach: evidence of unclear and present danger.白尾鹿对车辆靠近的反应:不明且当前存在危险的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e109988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109988. eCollection 2014.
2
Animal reactions to oncoming vehicles: a conceptual review.动物对迎面而来的车辆的反应:概念综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Feb;90(1):60-76. doi: 10.1111/brv.12093. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
3
Effects of vehicle speed on flight initiation by Turkey vultures: implications for bird-vehicle collisions.车速对土耳其兀鹰飞行起始的影响:对鸟类与车辆碰撞的启示
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087944. eCollection 2014.
4
European birds adjust their flight initiation distance to road speed limits.欧洲鸟类会根据道路限速调整其起飞距离。
Biol Lett. 2013 Aug 21;9(5):20130417. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0417. Print 2013 Oct 23.
5
Do male and female cowbirds see their world differently? Implications for sex differences in the sensory system of an avian brood parasite.雄鸟和雌鸟看到的世界是否不同?这对雀形目雏寄生鸟类感觉系统的性别差异意味着什么。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058985. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
Do animals generally flush early and avoid the rush? A meta-analysis.动物通常会提前“冲”吗?会避开“高峰期”吗?一项荟萃分析。
Biol Lett. 2013 Feb 20;9(2):20130016. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0016. Print 2013 Apr 23.
7
Effects of road networks on bird populations.路网对鸟类种群的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Apr;25(2):241-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01635.x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
8
Pedestrians, vehicles, and cell phones.行人和车辆还有手机。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
9
Individual consistency in flight initiation distances in burrowing owls: a new hypothesis on disturbance-induced habitat selection.穴鸮在启动飞行距离上的个体一致性:一种关于受干扰诱发的栖息地选择的新假说。
Biol Lett. 2010 Apr 23;6(2):167-70. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0739. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
10
Optimal flight initiation distance.最佳飞行起始距离。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Jan 7;244(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

速度夺命:鸟类对迎面驶来车辆的逃避反应无效。

Speed kills: ineffective avian escape responses to oncoming vehicles.

作者信息

DeVault Travis L, Blackwell Bradley F, Seamans Thomas W, Lima Steven L, Fernández-Juricic Esteban

机构信息

US Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Sandusky, OH 44870, USA

US Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Sandusky, OH 44870, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 22;282(1801):20142188. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2188.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.2188
PMID:25567648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4308997/
Abstract

Animal-vehicle collisions cause high levels of vertebrate mortality worldwide, and what goes wrong when animals fail to escape and ultimately collide with vehicles is not well understood. We investigated alert and escape behaviours of captive brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) in response to virtual vehicle approaches of different sizes and at speeds ranging from 60 to 360 km h(-1). Alert and flight initiation distances remained similar across vehicle speeds, and accordingly, alert and flight initiation times decreased at higher vehicle speeds. Thus, avoidance behaviours in cowbirds appeared to be based on distance rather than time available for escape, particularly at 60-150 km h(-1); however, at higher speeds (more than or equal to 180 km h(-1)) no trend in response behaviour was discernible. As vehicle speed increased, cowbirds did not have enough time to assess the approaching vehicle, and cowbirds generally did not initiate flight with enough time to avoid collision when vehicle speed exceeded 120 km h(-1). Although potentially effective for evading predators, the decision-making process used by cowbirds in our study appears maladaptive in the context of avoiding fast-moving vehicles. Our methodological approach and findings provide a framework to assess how novel management strategies could affect escape rules, and the sensory and cognitive abilities animals use to avoid vehicle collisions.

摘要

动物与车辆碰撞在全球范围内导致大量脊椎动物死亡,而当动物未能逃脱并最终与车辆相撞时究竟出了什么问题,目前还不太清楚。我们研究了圈养褐头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)对不同大小且速度范围为60至360公里/小时的虚拟车辆靠近的警觉和逃避行为。在不同车速下,警觉距离和飞行起始距离保持相似,因此,在较高车速下,警觉时间和飞行起始时间会减少。因此,牛鹂的回避行为似乎基于距离而非可用于逃脱的时间,特别是在60至150公里/小时时;然而,在更高速度(大于或等于180公里/小时)下,未观察到反应行为的趋势。随着车速增加,牛鹂没有足够时间评估靠近的车辆,并且当车速超过120公里/小时时,牛鹂通常没有足够时间启动飞行以避免碰撞。虽然在躲避捕食者方面可能有效,但我们研究中牛鹂使用的决策过程在避免快速行驶车辆的背景下似乎是不适应的。我们的方法和研究结果提供了一个框架,以评估新的管理策略如何影响逃脱规则,以及动物用于避免车辆碰撞的感官和认知能力。