• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过手术阿普加评分进行胃癌切除术的围手术期风险评估。

Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by surgical apgar score.

作者信息

Miki Yuichiro, Tokunaga Masanori, Tanizawa Yutaka, Bando Etsuro, Kawamura Taiichi, Terashima Masanori

机构信息

Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2601-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3653-2. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-3653-2
PMID:24664626
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a simple and easy complication prediction system, the surgical apgar score (SAS) calculated by three intraoperative parameters (estimated blood loss, lowest mean arterial pressure, and lowest heart rate), has been proposed for general surgery. In this study, we evaluated the predictability of the original SAS (oSAS) for severe complications after gastrectomy. In addition, the predictability of a modified SAS (mSAS) was evaluated, in which the cutoff value for blood loss was slightly modified.

METHODS

We investigated 328 patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center in 2010. Clinical data, including intraoperative parameters, were collected retrospectively. Patients with postoperative morbidities classified as Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or more were defined as having severe complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to elucidate factors that affected the development of severe complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (11.0 %) had severe complications postoperatively. Univariate analyses showed that the oSAS (p = 0.007) and mSAS (p < 0.001), as well as sex, preoperative chemotherapy, cStage, type of operation, thoracotomy, surgical approach, operation time, and extent of lymph node dissection, were associated with severe complications. Multivariate analysis showed that an mSAS ≤6 was found to be an independent risk factor for severe complication, while an oSAS ≤6 was not.

CONCLUSIONS

The oSAS was not found to be a predictive factor for severe complications following gastrectomy in Japanese patients. A slightly modified SAS (i.e. the mSAS) is considered to be a useful predictor for the development of severe complications in elective surgery.

摘要

背景

最近,一种简单易行的并发症预测系统——手术阿氏评分(SAS)被提出用于普通外科手术,该评分由三个术中参数(估计失血量、最低平均动脉压和最低心率)计算得出。在本研究中,我们评估了原始SAS(oSAS)对胃癌切除术后严重并发症的预测能力。此外,还评估了改良SAS(mSAS)的预测能力,其中对失血量的临界值进行了轻微修改。

方法

我们调查了2010年在静冈癌症中心接受胃癌切除术的328例患者。回顾性收集包括术中参数在内的临床资料。术后并发症分级为Clavien-Dindo IIIa级或更高的患者被定义为发生严重并发症。进行单因素和多因素分析以阐明影响严重并发症发生的因素。

结果

36例患者(11.0%)术后发生严重并发症。单因素分析显示,oSAS(p = 0.007)和mSAS(p < 0.001),以及性别、术前化疗、cStage、手术类型、开胸手术、手术入路、手术时间和淋巴结清扫范围,均与严重并发症相关。多因素分析显示,mSAS≤6是严重并发症的独立危险因素,而oSAS≤6则不是。

结论

在日本患者中,oSAS未被发现是胃癌切除术后严重并发症的预测因素。一种轻微改良的SAS(即mSAS)被认为是择期手术中严重并发症发生的有用预测指标。

相似文献

1
Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by surgical apgar score.通过手术阿普加评分进行胃癌切除术的围手术期风险评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2601-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3653-2. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
2
Predictive value of the surgical Apgar score on postoperative complications in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study.手术阿普加评分对接受新辅助化疗后根治性胃切除术的进展期胃癌患者术后并发症的预测价值:一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 11;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00813-9.
3
Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.应用改良手术 Apgar 评分预测宫颈癌机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术的围手术期并发症。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4809-4.
4
Preoperative C-reactive protein and operative blood loss predict poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy.术前C反应蛋白和手术失血量可预测腹腔镜辅助胃癌切除术后患者的预后不良。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Nov;7(4):287-94. doi: 10.1111/ases.12126. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
5
Low creatinine clearance is a risk factor for D2 gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.低肌酐清除率是新辅助化疗后行D2胃切除术的一个危险因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):3015-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3670-1. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
6
Clinical utility of the platelet-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy for clinical T2-4 gastric cancer.血小板-淋巴细胞比率作为临床T2-4期胃癌根治术后并发症预测指标的临床应用价值
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 14;23(14):2519-2526. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i14.2519.
7
[Clavien-Dindo classification and risk factors for complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[胃癌根治性胃切除术后的Clavien-Dindo分类及并发症危险因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;93(46):3667-70.
8
[Risk factors associated with postoperative complications of D2 radical resection for local advanced gastric cancer].[局部进展期胃癌D2根治性切除术后并发症的相关危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;16(8):764-7.
9
Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.手术阿氏评分可预测食管癌食管切除术后的发病率。
World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1145-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3425-1.
10
The Surgical Apgar Score Predicts Not Only Short-Term Complications But Also Long-Term Prognosis After Esophagectomy.手术 Apgar 评分不仅预测短期并发症,还预测食管癌手术后的长期预后。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(13):3934-3946. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6103-0. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The modified Surgical Apgar Score predictive value for postoperative complications after robotic surgery for rectal cancer.改良手术 Apgar 评分对直肠癌机器人手术后并发症的预测价值。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5657-5667. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11089-y. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients among octogenarians: a meta-analysis.八旬老人中腹腔镜胃癌切除术与开腹胃癌切除术治疗胃癌的Meta分析
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Feb;27(2):593-603. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03611-4. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Ability to predict surgical outcomes by surgical Apgar score: a systematic review.
通过手术 Apgar 评分预测手术结果的能力:系统评价。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02171-8.
4
The Surgical Apgar Score: A Systematic Review of Its Discriminatory Performance.手术阿普加评分:对其鉴别性能的系统评价。
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Dec 7;3(4):e227. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
A meta-analysis of the effect of laparoscopic gastric resection on the surgical site wound infection in patients with advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜胃切除术对进展期胃癌患者手术部位伤口感染影响的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4300-4307. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14332. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
6
The surgical Apgar score predicts postoperative complications and the survival in lung cancer patients.手术阿普加评分可预测肺癌患者术后并发症和生存情况。
Surg Today. 2023 Sep;53(9):1019-1027. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02677-x. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
7
The utility of surgical Apgar score in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery.外科阿普加评分在预测普通外科术后发病率和死亡率中的应用。
Turk J Surg. 2022 Sep 19;38(3):266-274. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5631. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
A Machine Learning-Modified Novel Nomogram to Predict Perioperative Blood Transfusion of Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.一种用于预测胃癌全胃切除围手术期输血情况的机器学习改进新型列线图
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 11;12:826760. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.826760. eCollection 2022.
9
Severity Assessment in Rats Undergoing Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Induction by Endovascular Perforation or Corresponding Sham Surgery.大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血诱导的经血管内穿孔或相应假手术的严重程度评估。
Eur Surg Res. 2023;64(1):120-138. doi: 10.1159/000524432. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
10
Surgical Apgar score could predict complications after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.外科 Apgar 评分可预测食管切除术的并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac045.