Loomans Max M, Tulen Joke H M, van Marle Hjalmar J C
Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Feb;25(1):42-53. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1906. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Most people who meet the diagnostic criteria for anti-social personality disorder (ASPD) do not meet the criteria for psychopathy. A differentiating feature is affective-interpersonal style. Eye blink startle reflex paradigms have been used to study affect.
The aim of this study is to explore an eye blink startle paradigm as a means of distinguishing between men with both ASPD and psychopathy, and men with ASPD alone.
One hundred and thirty-six men were recruited as follows: 31 patients with ASPD and a Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) score of 26 or more, 22 patients with ASPD and a PCL-R score of 25 or less, 50 forensic hospital employees and 33 general population men, none in the latter two groups having abnormal personality traits. Each was presented with 16 pleasant, 16 unpleasant and 16 neutral pictures. Acoustic probes were presented during each category at 300, 800, 1300 and 3800 milliseconds (ms) after picture onset. Eye blink response was measured by electromyography.
Overall, both patient groups showed significantly smaller eye blink responses to the startle stimuli compared with the community controls. Both the latter and the ASPD group showed the expected increase in eye blink response at longer startle latencies to unpleasant pictures than pleasant pictures, but this was not present either in the group with psychopathy or in the forensic hospital employees. With increasing startle latency onset, eye blink amplitude increased significantly in both the healthy comparison groups and the ASPD group, but not in the group with psychopathy.
We replicated eye blink startle modulation deficiencies among men with psychopathy. We confirmed that the psychopathy and ASPD groups could be distinguished by startle stimulus onset asynchrony, but this pattern was also seen in one healthy group - the forensic hospital employees. This suggests a case for more research with more diverse comparison groups and more differentiation of personality traits before drawing definitive conclusions about distinctive startle response patterns among men with psychopathy.
大多数符合反社会人格障碍(ASPD)诊断标准的人并不符合精神病态的标准。一个区分特征是情感人际风格。眨眼惊吓反射范式已被用于研究情感。
本研究的目的是探索一种眨眼惊吓范式,作为区分同时患有ASPD和精神病态的男性与仅患有ASPD的男性的一种方法。
招募了136名男性,具体如下:31名ASPD患者且修订版精神病态清单(PCL-R)得分在26分及以上,22名ASPD患者且PCL-R得分在25分及以下,50名法医医院员工和33名普通人群男性,后两组中均无人具有异常人格特质。向每人展示16张愉悦、16张不悦和16张中性图片。在每类图片出现后300、800、1300和3800毫秒(ms)时呈现声音探针。通过肌电图测量眨眼反应。
总体而言,与社区对照组相比,两个患者组对惊吓刺激的眨眼反应均显著较小。后一组和ASPD组在惊吓潜伏期较长时,对不悦图片的眨眼反应预期比愉悦图片增加,但在患有精神病态的组或法医医院员工中均未出现这种情况。随着惊吓潜伏期开始时间增加,健康对照组和ASPD组的眨眼幅度均显著增加,但患有精神病态的组未增加。
我们在患有精神病态的男性中复制了眨眼惊吓调节缺陷。我们证实,精神病态组和ASPD组可通过惊吓刺激起始异步性来区分,但这种模式在一个健康组——法医医院员工中也可见。这表明在对患有精神病态的男性独特的惊吓反应模式得出明确结论之前,需要对更多样化的对照组和更细致的人格特质进行更多研究。