Singh R K, Chand Sharad, Pal U S, Das Sanjib K, Sinha V P
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Department of Dentisry, Government Medical College, Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;4(2):225-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.127656.
The purpose of this study was to determine and compare various postoperative parameters like ease of operability, plate adaptability, stability etc., associated with use of matrix miniplate versus locking miniplate in the treatment of displaced mandibular angle fractures.
The study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, King George's Medical College, GM and Associated Hospital, Lucknow. Total 50 patients were treated and included in the study. These were divided into two groups of 25 each and were treated with two of the standard techniques, i.e., one is matrix miniplate osteosynthesis and other is locking miniplate osteosynthesis. These patients were evaluated for postoperative complications and the differences between the two Groups were assessed.
Patients treated by matrix miniplate showed better recovery phase postoperatively as compared to locking miniplate group.
Based on this study matrix mini plate osteosynthesis may be considered as the better alternative method available for the treatment of displaced mandibular angle fractures.
本研究的目的是确定并比较在治疗下颌角移位骨折时,使用基质微型钢板与锁定微型钢板相关的各种术后参数,如可操作性、钢板适应性、稳定性等。
本研究在勒克瑙乔治国王医学院及相关医院的口腔颌面外科进行。共治疗50例患者并纳入研究。这些患者被分为两组,每组25例,分别采用两种标准技术进行治疗,即一种是基质微型钢板骨合成术,另一种是锁定微型钢板骨合成术。对这些患者的术后并发症进行评估,并评估两组之间的差异。
与锁定微型钢板组相比,采用基质微型钢板治疗的患者术后恢复阶段更好。
基于本研究,基质微型钢板骨合成术可被视为治疗下颌角移位骨折的更好替代方法。