Suppr超能文献

短期心室辅助装置和体外生命支持系统疗法对英国国民医疗服务体系的成本影响。

The cost impact of short-term ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal life support systems therapies on the National Health Service in the UK.

作者信息

Borisenko Oleg, Wylie Gillian, Payne John, Bjessmo Staffan, Smith Jon, Firmin Richard, Yonan Nizar

机构信息

Synergus AB, Danderyd, Sweden

Scottish Extracorporeal Life Support Service, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):41-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu078. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the cost of using different blood pumps for short-term ventricular assist device (VAD) and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems for cardiac and cardiorespiratory failure in the UK.

METHODS

The cost analysis presented was based on evaluation of the time required to provide circulatory support for the following indications: post-cardiac surgery cardiogenic shock, postacute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock, deteriorating end-stage heart failure (ESHF) and the ability of different blood pumps to provide support for the necessary duration. The maximum length of support for each device was based on the manufacturers' recommendations. Direct medical cost of each treatment was evaluated only for the period of mechanical circulatory support in adults and children. Only the cost of device, placement and replacement procedures were considered. List prices were used for devices; resource use was based on expert opinion; unit costs were obtained from official UK sources and Wythenshawe hospital, Manchester, UK. Hospital perspective was utilized for analysis. Three VADs were selected for comparison in adults and two in children. Four centrifugal ECLS systems were selected for comparison in adults and two in children.

RESULTS

In both VAD and ECLS indications, the CentriMag® was the least expensive when used for support of patients with end-stage heart failure. Compared with Cardiohelp® for ECLS (which has the same maximum claim duration of support of 30 days), CentriMag® lead to cost savings of £4294 per patient in all three clinical conditions considered. In post-cardiac surgery cardiogenic shock, CentriMag® VAD lead to savings of £5014 per patient compared with BPX-80. Results were robust in one-way sensitivity analysis in comparison with Cardiohelp®.

CONCLUSIONS

CentriMag® and PediVAS® blood pumps can lead to significant cost savings to the National Health Service, when used instead of other pumps for short-term VAD or ECLS treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估在英国使用不同血泵用于短期心室辅助装置(VAD)和体外生命支持(ECLS)系统治疗心脏和心肺衰竭的成本。

方法

所呈现的成本分析基于对为以下适应症提供循环支持所需时间的评估:心脏手术后心源性休克、急性心肌梗死后心源性休克、终末期心力衰竭(ESHF)恶化,以及不同血泵为所需持续时间提供支持的能力。每种装置的最大支持时长基于制造商的建议。仅评估了成人和儿童机械循环支持期间每种治疗的直接医疗成本。仅考虑了装置、放置和更换程序的成本。装置使用标价;资源使用基于专家意见;单位成本来自英国官方来源以及英国曼彻斯特怀廷沙韦医院。分析采用医院视角。在成人中选择了三种VAD进行比较,在儿童中选择了两种。在成人中选择了四种离心式ECLS系统进行比较,在儿童中选择了两种。

结果

在VAD和ECLS适应症中,CentriMag®用于支持终末期心力衰竭患者时成本最低。与用于ECLS的Cardiohelp®(其最大支持时长相同,均为30天)相比,在所有三种考虑的临床情况下,CentriMag®使每位患者节省成本4294英镑。在心脏手术后心源性休克中,与BPX - 80相比,CentriMag® VAD使每位患者节省成本5014英镑。与Cardiohelp®相比,在单向敏感性分析中结果稳健。

结论

当使用CentriMag®和PediVAS®血泵替代其他泵进行短期VAD或ECLS治疗时,可为英国国家医疗服务体系节省大量成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验