• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Impella和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合进行双心室卸载治疗严重难治性心源性休克:联合使用这些设备的意义及生存的预后风险因素

Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival.

作者信息

Chatzis Georgios, Syntila Styliani, Markus Birgit, Ahrens Holger, Patsalis Nikolaos, Luesebrink Ulrich, Divchev Dimitar, Parahuleva Mariana, Al Eryani Hanna, Schieffer Bernhard, Karatolios Konstantinos

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 13;10(4):747. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040747.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10040747
PMID:33668590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7918629/
Abstract

Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support ( < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels.

摘要

由于机械循环支持(MCS)设备已成为难治性心源性休克(RCS)治疗中不可或缺的组成部分,我们确定了2013年2月至2019年12月期间67例使用Impella和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)进行双心室支持治疗RCS的患者,并评估了这种情况下的死亡风险因素。平均年龄为61.07±10.7岁,54例(80.6%)患者为男性。RCS的主要病因是急性心肌梗死(AMI)(74.6%),而44例(65.7%)患者在入院前已接受复苏。入院时简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)和序贯器官衰竭评估评分(SOFA)的平均值分别为73.54±16.03和12.25±2.71,对应的预期死亡率高于80%。双心室支持72小时内血管活性药物剂量和乳酸水平显著降低(两者均P<0.05)。总体而言,17例(25.4%)患者出院后接受心脏康复治疗,5例(7.5%)患者成功过渡到心室辅助装置植入,出院时总生存率为32.8%。6个月生存率为31.3%。双心室支持开始时乳酸>6 mmol/L、血管活性评分>100、pH<7.26,以及Charlson合并症指数>3和既往复苏是生存的独立预测因素。总之,对于RCS患者,使用Impella和VA-ECMO进行双心室支持是可行且有效的,主要通过显著改善血流动力学和降低乳酸水平,其生存率高于传统风险评分预测的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/40ddfd82d169/jcm-10-00747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/8b5d9cc92b43/jcm-10-00747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/509798574983/jcm-10-00747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/0c588f95b048/jcm-10-00747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/40ddfd82d169/jcm-10-00747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/8b5d9cc92b43/jcm-10-00747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/509798574983/jcm-10-00747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/0c588f95b048/jcm-10-00747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c4c/7918629/40ddfd82d169/jcm-10-00747-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival.使用Impella和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合进行双心室卸载治疗严重难治性心源性休克:联合使用这些设备的意义及生存的预后风险因素
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 13;10(4):747. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040747.
2
Biventricular unloading in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.难治性心源性休克患者的双心室卸载
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.227. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
3
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: Choosing the right mechanical circulatory support to improve outcomes.体外膜肺氧合与微轴左心室辅助装置治疗心源性休克:选择合适的机械循环支持以改善预后。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 16;13:200-213. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.12.011. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
VA-ECMO Support in Nonsurgical Patients With Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Pre-Implant Outcome Predictors.非手术难治性心源性休克患者的VA-ECMO支持:植入前结局预测因素
Artif Organs. 2019 Feb;43(2):132-141. doi: 10.1111/aor.13331. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
5
Clinical efficacy of direct or indirect left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary cardiogenic shock.在心肺体外膜氧合治疗原发性心源性休克期间直接或间接左心室卸载的临床疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;165(2):699-707.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Scrutinizing the Role of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Has Clinical Practice Outpaced the Evidence?审视静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合的作用:临床实践是否超越了证据?
Circulation. 2024 Mar 26;149(13):1033-1052. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067087. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.经皮心室辅助装置与静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的前瞻性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e012171. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012171.
8
Comparison of Mortality Risk Models in Patients with Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.心脏停搏后心原性休克与经皮机械循环支持患者死亡率风险模型比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jan 18;2021:8843935. doi: 10.1155/2021/8843935. eCollection 2021.
9
Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.体外生命支持治疗心肌梗死后合并心源性休克时的左心室卸载:外科排气与 Impella 装置。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan 6;34(1):137-144. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab230. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
10
Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.经皮辅助装置在体外膜肺氧合治疗急性心肌梗死合并心搏骤停中的左心室卸载作用。
Int J Artif Organs. 2024 Jun;47(6):401-410. doi: 10.1177/03913988241254978. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Venoarterial Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock Complicated from an Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Overview and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的静脉-动脉膜肺氧合:综述与综合荟萃分析
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 20;13(1):237. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010237.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun;74(6):544. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.05.002.
2
Association between serum lactate levels and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory support: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.血清乳酸水平与机械循环支持治疗的心源性休克患者死亡率的关系:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Nov 24;20(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01785-7.
3
Arterial Lactate in Cardiogenic Shock: Prognostic Value of Clearance Versus Single Values.
心源性休克中的动脉乳酸:清除率与单一值的预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 12;13(19):2208-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.037.
4
Left Ventricular Unloading Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From an International, Multicenter Cohort Study.左心室卸载与使用体外膜肺氧合治疗的心源性休克患者的死亡率降低相关:一项国际多中心队列研究的结果。
Circulation. 2020 Dec;142(22):2095-2106. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048792. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.早期应用机械循环支持稳定并可能挽救难治性心源性休克患者。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;13(3):e005853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005853. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
Strategies of left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO support: a network meta-analysis.体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)支持期间左心室卸载策略:一项网状Meta分析
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;312:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature.心源性休克临时经皮机械循环支持的并发症:当代文献评估
Cardiol Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):211-228. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-00152-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
8
Impact of microaxillar mechanical left ventricular support on renal resistive index in patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a pilot trial to predict renal organ dysfunction in cardiogenic shock.机械左心室辅助对心肌梗死后心源性休克患者肾血管阻力指数的影响:预测心源性休克肾器官功能障碍的试验性研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(2):158-163. doi: 10.1177/2048872619860218. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中,Impella 与 IABP 比较。
Open Heart. 2019 May 13;6(1):e000987. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000987. eCollection 2019.
10
Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.体外生命支持在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克中的应用
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 14;73(18):2355-2357. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.044.