Hasson Christopher J
Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Neuromotor Systems Laboratory, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 301 Robinson Hall, Boston, MA, 02115-5005, USA,
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2105-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3901-5. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Several theories of motor control posit that the nervous system has access to a neural representation of muscle dynamics. Yet, this has not been tested experimentally. Should such a representation exist, it was hypothesized that subjects who learned to control a virtual limb using virtual muscles would improve performance faster and show greater generalization than those who learned with a less dynamically complex virtual force generator. Healthy adults practiced using their biceps brachii activity to move a myoelectrically controlled virtual limb from rest to a standard target position with maximum speed and accuracy. Throughout practice, generalization was assessed with untrained target trials and sensitivity to actuator dynamics was probed by unexpected actuator model switches. In a muscle model subject group (n = 10), the biceps electromyographic signal activated a virtual muscle that pulled on the virtual limb with a force governed by muscle dynamics, defined by a nonlinear force-length-velocity relation and series elastic stiffness. A force generator group (n = 10) performed the same task, but the actuation force was a linear function of the biceps activation signal. Both groups made significant errors with unexpected actuator dynamics switches, supporting task sensitivity to actuator dynamics. The muscle model group improved performance as fast as the force generator group and showed greater generalization in early practice, despite using an actuator with more complex dynamics. These results are consistent with a preexisting neural representation of muscle dynamics, which may have offset any learning challenges associated with the more dynamically complex virtual muscle model.
几种运动控制理论认为,神经系统能够获取肌肉动力学的神经表征。然而,这一点尚未经过实验验证。如果这样的表征确实存在,那么据推测,与使用动态复杂性较低的虚拟力发生器进行学习的受试者相比,那些使用虚拟肌肉学习控制虚拟肢体的受试者将更快地提高表现,并展现出更强的泛化能力。健康成年人练习通过肱二头肌活动,以最大速度和精度将肌电控制的虚拟肢体从静止位置移动到标准目标位置。在整个练习过程中,通过未训练的目标试验评估泛化能力,并通过意外的执行器模型切换来探究对执行器动力学的敏感性。在肌肉模型受试者组(n = 10)中,肱二头肌肌电信号激活一个虚拟肌肉,该虚拟肌肉以由肌肉动力学决定的力拉动虚拟肢体,肌肉动力学由非线性力-长度-速度关系和串联弹性刚度定义。力发生器组(n = 10)执行相同任务,但驱动力是肱二头肌激活信号的线性函数。两组在意外的执行器动力学切换时都出现了显著误差,这支持了任务对执行器动力学的敏感性。尽管使用了动力学更复杂的执行器,但肌肉模型组与力发生器组一样快速地提高了表现,并且在早期练习中展现出更强的泛化能力。这些结果与预先存在的肌肉动力学神经表征一致,这可能抵消了与动力学更复杂的虚拟肌肉模型相关的任何学习挑战。