J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Apr;22(4):256-60. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-04-256.
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed an Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) on the Non-Arthroplasty Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (OAK). Evidence-based information, in conjunction with clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care and obtain best outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The OAK AUC clinical scenarios were derived from patient indications that generally accompany OAK as well as from the current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and its supporting literature. The 576 patient scenarios and 10 treatments were developed by the Writing Panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, the Review Panel, a separate group of volunteer physicians, independently reviewed these materials to ensure that they were representative of patient scenarios clinicians are likely to encounter in daily practice. Finally, the multidisciplinary Voting Panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as Appropriate (median rating, 7 to 9), May Be Appropriate (median rating, 4 to 6), or Rarely Appropriate (median rating, 1 to 3). The final appropriateness ratings assigned by the voting panel can be accessed online via the AAOS OAK AUC web-based mobile application at: www.aaos.org/aucapp.
美国矫形外科医师学会已经制定了膝关节骨关节炎(OAK)非关节置换治疗的适当使用标准(AUC)。该标准的制定结合了循证医学信息和医生的临床专业知识,旨在改善患者的护理,并在考虑到制定临床决策时的细微差别和区别的前提下获得最佳结果。OAK AUC 临床情况源自伴随 OAK 出现的患者指征,以及基于证据的临床实践指南及其支持文献。576 个患者情况和 10 种治疗方法由写作小组制定,该小组由专门研究该 AUC 主题的临床医生组成。然后,由志愿医生组成的独立审查小组对这些材料进行独立审查,以确保它们代表了临床医生在日常实践中可能遇到的患者情况。最后,由多学科投票小组(由专家和非专家组成)使用 9 分制对每个患者情况的治疗方法进行适当性评分,以指定治疗方法为适当(中位数评分为 7 至 9)、可能适当(中位数评分为 4 至 6)或很少适当(中位数评分为 1 至 3)。投票小组分配的最终适当性评分可以通过访问以下网址在线获得:www.aaos.org/aucapp。