Sanders James O, Heggeness Michael H, Murray Jayson N, Pezold Ryan C, Sevarino Kaitlyn S
From the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (Dr. Sanders), the University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, KS (Dr. Heggeness), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL (Mr. Murray, Mr. Pezold, and Ms. Sevarino).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Feb;24(2):e21-3. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00701.
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) document Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures With Vascular Injury. Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care and obtain the best outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The AUC clinical patient scenarios were derived from patient indications that generally accompany a pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture with vascular injury, as well as from current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and supporting literature. The 6 patient scenarios and 18 treatments were developed by the Writing Panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, the Review Panel, a separate group of volunteer physicians, independently reviewed these materials to ensure that they were representative of patient scenarios that clinicians are likely to encounter in daily practice. Finally, the multidisciplinary Voting Panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as Appropriate (median rating, 7 to 9), May Be Appropriate (median rating, 4 to 6), or Rarely Appropriate (median rating, 1 to 3).
美国矫形外科医师学会制定了《儿童肱骨髁上骨折伴血管损伤的合理使用标准(AUC)》文件。基于证据的信息与医生的临床专业知识相结合,用于制定该标准,以改善患者护理并在考虑临床决策所需的细微差别和区别的同时获得最佳结果。AUC临床患者场景源自通常伴随儿童肱骨髁上骨折伴血管损伤的患者指征,以及当前基于证据的临床实践指南和支持性文献。6种患者场景和18种治疗方法由撰写小组制定,该小组是一群在该AUC主题方面的临床专家。接下来,由另一组志愿医生组成的评审小组独立审查了这些材料,以确保它们代表了临床医生在日常实践中可能遇到的患者场景。最后,多学科投票小组(由专家和非专家组成)使用9分制对每个患者场景的治疗适宜性进行评分,将一种治疗指定为适宜(中位数评分,7至9)、可能适宜(中位数评分,4至6)或很少适宜(中位数评分,1至3)。