Suppr超能文献

初级水处理过程中TiO纳米颗粒的去除:混凝剂类型、剂量和纳米颗粒浓度的作用

Removal of TiO Nanoparticles During Primary Water Treatment: Role of Coagulant Type, Dose, and Nanoparticle Concentration.

作者信息

Honda Ryan J, Keene Valerie, Daniels Louise, Walker Sharon L

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California , Riverside, California.

出版信息

Environ Eng Sci. 2014 Mar 1;31(3):127-134. doi: 10.1089/ees.2013.0269.

Abstract

Nanomaterials from consumer products (i.e., paints, sunscreens, toothpastes, and food grade titanium dioxide [TiO]) have the capacity to end up in groundwater and surface water, which is of concern because the effectiveness of removing them via traditional treatment is uncertain. Although aggregation and transport of nanomaterials have been investigated, studies on their removal from suspension are limited. Hence, this study involves the development of scaled-down jar tests to determine the mechanisms involved in the removal of a model metal oxide nanoparticle (NP), TiO, in artificial groundwater (AGW), and artificial surface water (ASW) at the primary stages of treatment: coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation. Total removal was quantified at the end of each treatment stage by spectroscopy. Three different coagulants-iron chloride (FeCl), iron sulfate (FeSO), and alum [Al(SO)]-destabilized the TiO NPs in both source waters. Overall, greater than one-log removal was seen in groundwater for all coagulants at a constant dose of 50 mg/L and across the range of particle concentrations (10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/L). In surface water, greater than 90% removal was seen with FeSO and Al(SO), but less than 60% when using FeCl. Additionally, removal was most effective at higher NP concentrations (50 and 100 mg/L) in AGW when compared with ASW. Zeta potential was measured and compared between AGW and ASW with the presence of all three coagulants at the same treatment stage times as in the removal studies. These electrokinetic trends confirm that the greatest total removal of NPs occurred when the magnitude of charge was smallest (<10 mV) and conversely, higher zeta potential values (>35 mV) measured were under conditions with poor removal (<90%). These results are anticipated to be of considerable interest to practitioners for the assessment of traditional treatment processes' capacity to remove nanomaterials prior to subsequent filtration and distribution to domestic water supplies.

摘要

消费品中的纳米材料(如涂料、防晒霜、牙膏和食品级二氧化钛[TiO₂])最终有可能进入地下水和地表水,这令人担忧,因为通过传统处理方式去除这些材料的效果尚不确定。尽管已经对纳米材料的聚集和迁移进行了研究,但关于从悬浮液中去除它们的研究却很有限。因此,本研究开展了小型化的烧杯试验,以确定在处理的初级阶段(混凝、絮凝和沉淀)从人工地下水(AGW)和人工地表水中去除模型金属氧化物纳米颗粒(NP)TiO₂所涉及的机制。在每个处理阶段结束时,通过光谱法对总去除量进行定量。三种不同的混凝剂——氯化铁(FeCl₃)、硫酸铁(FeSO₄)和明矾[Al₂(SO₄)₃]——使两种水源中的TiO₂纳米颗粒失稳。总体而言,在50 mg/L的恒定剂量下,对于所有混凝剂,在地下水以及10、25、50和100 mg/L的颗粒浓度范围内,去除率均超过一个对数单位。在地表水中,FeSO₄和Al₂(SO₄)₃的去除率超过90%,但使用FeCl₃时去除率低于60%。此外,与地表水相比,如果纳米颗粒浓度较高(50和100 mg/L),在人工地下水中的去除效果最为显著。在与去除研究相同的处理阶段时间,测量并比较了添加所有三种混凝剂时人工地下水和地表水之间的ζ电位。这些电动趋势证实,当电荷强度最小时(<10 mV),纳米颗粒的总去除量最大;相反,在去除效果较差(<90%)的条件下,测得的ζ电位值较高(>35 mV)。预计这些结果对于从业者在评估传统处理工艺在后续过滤和向家庭供水系统分配之前去除纳米材料的能力方面具有重要意义。

相似文献

9
Evaluating nanoparticle breakthrough during drinking water treatment.评估饮用水处理过程中的纳米颗粒穿透情况。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Oct;121(10):1161-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1306574. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

4
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products.食品和个人护理产品中的二氧化钛纳米颗粒。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 21;46(4):2242-50. doi: 10.1021/es204168d. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
8
The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.工程纳米材料向环境中的释放。
J Environ Monit. 2011 May;13(5):1145-55. doi: 10.1039/c0em00547a. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验