Suppr超能文献

在心脏移植患者随访中,作为排斥反应和感染标志物的生化分析物多元组合的诊断有效性。

Diagnostic validity of multivariate combinations of biochemical analytes as markers for rejection and infection in the follow-up of patients with heart transplants.

作者信息

Hölzel W G, Havel M, Laczkovics A, Müller M M

机构信息

Institut für Pathologische und Klinische Biochemie, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Charité, GDR.

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1988 Nov;26(11):667-71. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1988.26.11.667.

Abstract

The diagnostic validity of multivariate combinations of alpha 1-antitrypsin, alpha 2-macroglobulin, C-reactive protein, complement C3, complement C4, neopterin in serum, and neopterin in urine as markers for acute cardiac allograft rejection and for differential diagnosis of rejection and infections was investigated in the follow-up of 37 patients with heart transplants. Rejection was diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy. Infections were classified as 'no infection', 'viral infection', and 'bacterial, fungal or mixed infections'. Although there are significant differences between the mean levels of analytes, multivariate discriminant analysis does not provide an adequate discrimination of rejection and infection states. In separate rejection diagnosis, multivariate combinations of analytes cannot replace endomyocardial biopsy. However, a multivariate combination of alpha 1-antitrypsin, alpha 2-macroglobulin, C-reactive protein, C3, C4 in serum, and neopterin in urine can be used as a screening procedure to reduce the number of endomyocardial biopsies.

摘要

在37例心脏移植患者的随访中,研究了血清中α1 -抗胰蛋白酶、α2 -巨球蛋白、C反应蛋白、补体C3、补体C4、新蝶呤以及尿中新蝶呤的多变量组合作为急性心脏移植排斥反应标志物以及用于排斥反应与感染鉴别诊断的诊断有效性。排斥反应通过心内膜心肌活检进行诊断。感染分为“无感染”、“病毒感染”和“细菌、真菌或混合感染”。尽管分析物的平均水平之间存在显著差异,但多变量判别分析并不能充分区分排斥反应和感染状态。在单独的排斥反应诊断中,分析物的多变量组合不能替代心内膜心肌活检。然而,血清中的α1 -抗胰蛋白酶、α2 -巨球蛋白、C反应蛋白、C3、C4以及尿中新蝶呤的多变量组合可作为一种筛查程序,以减少心内膜心肌活检的次数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验