Shaw A C
Department of Microbiology, Joyce Green Hospital, Dartford, Kent.
J Clin Pathol. 1991 Jul;44(7):596-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.7.596.
Serum C-reactive protein and neopterin concentrations were measured in samples taken at an early stage in different types of infection to see whether the combination of markers could contribute to the diagnosis of infection and help distinguish between bacterial and viral infections, tuberculosis, and infections due to "other" pathogens. Both markers were significantly raised in all categories of infection compared with controls, and there were significant differences between the means of both markers when comparing several of the categories of infection. Only C-reactive protein concentrations in bacteraemic patients, however, were both sensitive and specific at distinguishing the type of infection. The additional use of neopterin estimation played only a minor part in increasing the specificity of diagnosis in tuberculosis and in viral infections. On the basis of this study it was not considered worth the time and expense of performing neopterin assays in addition to C-reactive protein estimations to differentiate viral from bacterial infection.
在不同类型感染的早期采集样本,测量血清C反应蛋白和新蝶呤浓度,以观察这两种标志物的组合是否有助于感染的诊断,并帮助区分细菌感染和病毒感染、结核病以及由“其他”病原体引起的感染。与对照组相比,所有感染类别中这两种标志物均显著升高,在比较几种感染类别时,两种标志物的均值存在显著差异。然而,只有菌血症患者的C反应蛋白浓度在区分感染类型时既敏感又特异。额外进行新蝶呤检测在提高结核病和病毒感染诊断的特异性方面作用不大。基于这项研究,除了C反应蛋白检测外,再进行新蝶呤检测以区分病毒感染和细菌感染,被认为不值得花费时间和费用。