Suppr超能文献

用国际标准对 DiaSorin 和 Roche 第三代自动化 PTH 检测进行标准化:对临床人群的影响。

Standardization of DiaSorin and Roche automated third generation PTH assays with an International Standard: impact on clinical populations.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Aug;52(8):1137-41. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-1027.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardization of parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays is a major issue, especially in hemodialyzed (HD) patients. Two automated third generation PTH assays (Roche Elecsys and DiaSorin Liaison) are now available. These assays are specific for the (1-84) PTH and do not cross-react with the (7-84) fragment, contrary to second generation (intact) assays. We aimed to calibrate the two methods against the WHO International PTH Standard (IS) 95/646 to see if the two assays could provide comparable results in a population of healthy subjects, HD patients and patients suffering from primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP).

METHODS

We selected 79 healthy subjects and two populations of patients presenting PTH disorders: 56 HD and 27 PHP patients. We reconstituted the IS in a pool of human serum containing undetectable levels of 1-84 PTH and prepared 13 serum standards ranging from 0 to 2000 pg/mL. The standards were run on the two instruments to calibrate the assays on the IS. The different populations were run before and after restandardization.

RESULTS

As these kits were differently calibrated, the results obtained after restandarization were significantly different. Restandardization process improved concordance between assays and, taking the analytical variability of the two kits into account, the results could be considered to be similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Restandardization of automated third generation PTH assays with the WHO 1-84 PTH Standard significantly reduces inter-method variability. Reference ranges and raw values are totally transposable from one method to the other in healthy subjects, but also in diseased patients, e.g., with HD or those suffering from PHP.

摘要

背景

甲状旁腺激素(PTH)检测的标准化是一个主要问题,尤其是在血液透析(HD)患者中。现在有两种自动化第三代 PTH 检测方法(罗氏 Elecsys 和 DiaSorin Liaison)可用。这些检测方法针对(1-84)PTH 具有特异性,并且与第二代(完整)检测方法不同,不会与(7-84)片段发生交叉反应。我们旨在通过与世界卫生组织国际 PTH 标准(IS)95/646 校准这两种方法,以确定这两种检测方法是否可以在健康受试者、HD 患者和原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症(PHP)患者人群中提供可比的结果。

方法

我们选择了 79 名健康受试者和两组存在 PTH 紊乱的患者:56 名 HD 患者和 27 名 PHP 患者。我们在含有无法检测到的 1-84 PTH 的人血清池中将 IS 重新配制,并制备了 13 个血清标准品,范围从 0 到 2000 pg/ml。在这两种仪器上运行这些标准品以根据 IS 校准检测方法。在重新标准化之前和之后运行不同的人群。

结果

由于这些试剂盒的校准方式不同,重新标准化后获得的结果有显著差异。重新标准化过程改善了检测方法之间的一致性,并且考虑到两种试剂盒的分析变异性,结果可以认为是相似的。

结论

使用世界卫生组织 1-84 PTH 标准对自动化第三代 PTH 检测方法进行重新标准化,显著降低了方法间的变异性。在健康受试者中,参考范围和原始值可以从一种方法完全转移到另一种方法,在患有 HD 或 PHP 等疾病的患者中也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验