Schleck Marie-Louise, Souberbielle Jean-Claude, Delanaye Pierre, Plebani Mario, Cavalier Etienne
.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jul 26;55(8):1152-1159. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0914.
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) stability is important. Many studies have shown divergent results between EDTA and serum, which are mainly linked to differences in protocols or cut-offs used to determine whether or not PTH remained stable. No studies have yet compared PTH stability as measured by second- and third-generation assays on the same samples in hemodialyzed patients and healthy subjects.
Five pairs of samples (EDTA and gel tubes) were obtained in 10 hemodialyzed patients before a dialysis session and in 10 healthy subjects. One pair was centrifuged and run directly to define the "T0". Two pairs were kept at +4°C and two pairs were kept at +25°C. They were centrifuged after 4 and 18 h. Supernatant was kept at -80°C for 1 week. All samples were measured in a single batch, on Roche Cobas and DiaSorin XL second- and third-generation PTH assays. We used three different approaches to evaluate PTH stability: Wilcoxon test, an Acceptable Change Limit (ACL) according to ISO Guide 5725-6 and a Total Change Limit (TCL) derived from the sum of biological and technical variability according to WHO.
PTH decreased in all samples. Stability of PTH was mainly dependent on the way it was evaluated. Percentages of decrease were systematically lower in EDTA vs. serum. Wilcoxon and ACL showed that PTH was no more stable after 4 h at +4°C in EDTA or serum gel tubes. None of the subjects presented a PTH decrease higher than the TCL with EDTA plasma. In serum gel tubes, PTH was unstable only when kept at 25°C for 18 h.
PTH seems more stable in EDTA than in serum gel tubes but only when samples have to stay unprocessed for a long period (18 h) at room temperature (25°C), which can happen when samples are delivered from external care centers. For all the other conditions, using serum gel tubes is recommended since calcium measurement, which is necessary for a good PTH results interpretation, can be achieved on the same tube.
甲状旁腺激素(PTH)的稳定性很重要。许多研究表明,乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)管血样和血清中PTH的检测结果存在差异,这主要与用于确定PTH是否保持稳定的方案或临界值的不同有关。尚无研究在血液透析患者和健康受试者的同一样本上比较第二代和第三代检测方法所测PTH的稳定性。
在10例血液透析患者透析前及10名健康受试者中采集5对样本(EDTA管和凝胶管血样)。其中一对离心后直接检测以确定“T0”。两对样本保存在4°C,两对保存在25°C。4小时和18小时后离心。上清液保存在-80°C一周。所有样本在同一批中使用罗氏Cobas和索灵XL第二代及第三代PTH检测方法进行检测。我们使用三种不同方法评估PTH稳定性:Wilcoxon检验、根据ISO指南5725-6的可接受变化限度(ACL)以及根据世界卫生组织(WHO)由生物学和技术变异性总和得出的总变化限度(TCL)。
所有样本中PTH均下降。PTH的稳定性主要取决于评估方式。EDTA管血样中PTH下降百分比系统性低于血清。Wilcoxon检验和ACL显示,在4°C条件下,EDTA管或血清凝胶管中的PTH在4小时后不再稳定。EDTA血浆样本中,没有受试者的PTH下降幅度高于TCL。在血清凝胶管中,仅当在25°C保存18小时时PTH不稳定。
PTH在EDTA管中似乎比在血清凝胶管中更稳定,但仅当样本必须在室温(25°C)下长时间(18小时)保持未处理状态时才如此,这种情况可能发生在样本从外部护理中心送达时。对于所有其他情况,建议使用血清凝胶管,因为在同一管中可以进行钙测量,而钙测量对于准确解读PTH检测结果是必要的。