Plešivčnik Novljan Martina, Rotar Ziga, Ambrožič Aleš, Vidmar Gaj, Tomšič Matija
Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;33(11):1657-64. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2549-7. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
The objective of the study is to compare the longitudinal performance of different classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) in a cohort of patients previously diagnosed with primary SS. In each patient, we repeated diagnostic tests as required by the Copenhagen, European, Californian, and American-European Consensus Group (AECG) or the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. Sixty-three out of 90 eligible patients (70 %) consented to participate. During the follow-up (mean (standard deviation, SD) 7.6 years (0.5)), we observed evolution from primary SS to SS with another systemic autoimmune disease (SAD) in 9/63 (14 %) patients, on average after 4.0 years (SD 0.9). The evolution from primary SS to SS-SADs was significantly more common if the diagnosis of primary SS was initially made using AECG (17 %, p = 0.008) or ACR (16 %, p = 0.016) criteria. In the 34 patients who underwent a full diagnostic reassessment, the diagnosis retention rate was statistically significant for all the criteria, except the European criteria. At reassessment, 3/32 (9 %) patients initially diagnosed as having primary SS using the European criteria could not be classified as having primary SS by any of the criteria. The differences in classification when using the AECG and the new ACR criteria were not statistically significant. The longitudinal diagnosis retention rate was highest for the Californian and AECG criteria. Regardless of the classification criteria, some patients eventually develop another SAD.
本研究的目的是比较不同原发性干燥综合征(SS)分类标准在一组先前诊断为原发性SS的患者中的纵向表现。对于每位患者,我们按照哥本哈根、欧洲、加利福尼亚和欧美共识小组(AECG)或新的美国风湿病学会(ACR)分类标准的要求重复进行诊断测试。90名符合条件的患者中有63名(70%)同意参与。在随访期间(平均(标准差,SD)7.6年(0.5)),我们观察到9/63(14%)的患者从原发性SS进展为合并另一种系统性自身免疫性疾病(SAD)的SS,平均发生在4.0年(SD 0.9)后。如果最初使用AECG(17%,p = 0.008)或ACR(16%,p = 0.016)标准诊断原发性SS,那么从原发性SS进展为SS-SADs的情况显著更为常见。在接受全面诊断重新评估的34名患者中,除欧洲标准外,所有标准的诊断保留率均具有统计学意义。在重新评估时,最初使用欧洲标准诊断为原发性SS的3/32(9%)患者无法被任何标准归类为原发性SS。使用AECG和新ACR标准时的分类差异无统计学意义。加利福尼亚和AECG标准的纵向诊断保留率最高。无论采用何种分类标准,一些患者最终都会发展为另一种SAD。