McKendree M G S, Croney C C, Olynk Widmar N J
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.
J Anim Sci. 2014 May;92(5):1821-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7586. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
To address escalating concerns about livestock animal care and welfare it is necessary to better understand the factors that may predispose people to develop such concerns. It has been hypothesized that experiences with, beliefs about, and emotional connections to animals may influence level of perceived obligation toward and therefore concern for animals. However, the extent to which people's classifications of animals and their status as pet owners may impact their views on food animal care and welfare practices remains unclear. An online survey of 798 U.S. households was therefore conducted in June 2012 to understand differences in consumer sentiment towards various animal species, classification of certain species (as pet, livestock or neither), and variations in food animal welfare concerns between dog and/or cat owners and those who do not own such species. Sixty-six percent of households in the survey owned at least 1 animal. Forty-eight percent owned dogs, 41% owned cats, 3% owned horses, and 10% owned other animals. As expected, dogs and cats were classified by most respondents (90%) as pets. Most respondents similarly categorized rabbits (58%) and horses (55%) as pets, although consensus was not found for horses with 27% classifying them as livestock animals and 18% as neither pets nor livestock. Over 80% of respondents classified beef cows, dairy cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys as livestock. The majority of survey respondents were opposed to eating cats and dogs followed closely by horses due to ethical and/or spiritual reasons. Dog and/or cat owners more often reported having a source for animal welfare information (68%) than those who did not own these species (49%). Additionally, dog and/or cat owners were more concerned about food animal welfare for both domestically raised food animals and those raised outside the United States (dog and/or cat owners mean level of concern was 3.88 for domestic animal welfare and 5.16 for those raised outside the United States compared with non-dog or -cat owners with means of 4.46 and 5.46, respectively). Although a causal relationship cannot be established, pet ownership and increased concern for food animal welfare appear to be correlated. These data suggest that increased interest in protecting food animals may stem from interactions with and emotional connections to pets, especially when combined with other factors such as having a source for animal welfare information, education level, age, and gender.
为了应对人们对家畜动物护理和福利日益增加的担忧,有必要更好地了解可能使人们产生此类担忧的因素。据推测,与动物的经历、对动物的信念以及与动物的情感联系可能会影响人们对动物的感知义务程度,进而影响对动物的关注程度。然而,人们对动物的分类以及他们作为宠物主人的身份在多大程度上会影响他们对食用动物护理和福利做法的看法仍不明确。因此,2012年6月对798户美国家庭进行了一项在线调查,以了解消费者对各种动物物种的情绪差异、某些物种的分类(作为宠物、家畜或都不是),以及狗和/或猫主人与不拥有此类物种的人在食用动物福利问题上的差异。参与调查的家庭中有66%至少拥有1只动物。48%的家庭养狗,41%养猫,3%养马,10%养其他动物。正如预期的那样,大多数受访者(90%)将狗和猫归类为宠物。大多数受访者同样将兔子(58%)和马(55%)归类为宠物,不过对于马没有达成共识,27%的人将它们归类为家畜动物,18%的人认为它们既不是宠物也不是家畜。超过80%的受访者将肉牛、奶牛、猪、鸡和火鸡归类为家畜。大多数参与调查的受访者出于道德和/或精神原因反对食用猫、狗,其次是马。养狗和/或养猫的人比不拥有这些物种的人更常报告有动物福利信息来源(68%对49%)。此外,养狗和/或养猫的人对国内饲养的食用动物以及在美国境外饲养的食用动物的福利更为关注(养狗和/或养猫的人对国内动物福利的平均关注程度为3.88,对在美国境外饲养的动物的平均关注程度为5.16,相比之下,不养狗或猫的人的平均关注程度分别为4.46和5.46)。虽然无法建立因果关系,但拥有宠物和对食用动物福利的关注度增加似乎存在关联。这些数据表明,对保护食用动物兴趣的增加可能源于与宠物的互动和情感联系,特别是当与其他因素如拥有动物福利信息来源、教育水平、年龄和性别相结合时。