Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Aug 1;115(3-4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
The aims of this descriptive cross-sectional study were to investigate dog and cat acquisition and attitudes toward pet care among residents of the Chicago area (zip codes 60600-60660); to compare data obtained from owners of shelter-acquired pets with those of residents who acquired their pets from other sources; to compare data from dog owners with cat owners; and to compare pet health practices among the respondents of different zip code income groups. In-person surveys administered at five pet store locations collected data from 529 respondents, representing 582 dogs and 402 cats owned or continuously cared for in the past 3 years. Median household income data for represented zip codes was also obtained. Shelters were the most common source of cats (p<0.01) and were the second most common source of dogs. Cats were more likely to have been acquired as strays, while dogs were more likely to have been acquired from friends/family/neighbors, pet stores, breeders or rescue organizations and to be kept as outdoor-only pets (p<0.01). More cats were kept per household than dogs (dogs mean=1.32/household; cats mean=1.78/household; p<0.01). Pet owners were most commonly 'very likely' (5 on a 1-5/5 Likert scale) to administer all hypothetical treatments discussed, although cat owners were less likely to spend time training their pet (p=0.05). Cat owners were less likely to have taken their pet to a veterinarian for vaccinations or annual physical exams (p<0.01). Shelter-acquired cats were significantly more likely to have been taken by their owners to the veterinarian for annual exams (p=0.05) than cats obtained as strays. Owners of shelter-acquired pets were at least as willing as other respondents to administer hypothetical treatments and pay ≥$1000 for veterinary treatment. Respondents from site #3 lived in zip codes that had relatively lower median household incomes (p<0.01) and were less likely to spend ≥$1000 on their pets than those at the four other sites (p<0.01). Over 90% of pet owners from all acquisition categories expressed very high levels of attachment (≥8-10/10 on a Likert scale), except for owners of cats acquired as strays (84.9%) or from the 'other' category (75.0%). Survey respondents commonly acquired their pets from shelters and those who did were at least as willing to pay for and provide veterinary care as respondents who owned pets acquired from other sources. The data collected provides a snapshot of the attitudes of survey respondents in the Chicago area toward pet acquisition and care.
本描述性横断面研究的目的是调查芝加哥地区(邮编 60600-60660)居民的犬猫获得情况和宠物护理态度;比较从收容所获得宠物的主人和从其他来源获得宠物的主人的数据;比较犬主人和猫主人的数据;并比较不同邮政编码收入群体的受访者的宠物健康实践。在五个宠物商店地点进行的面对面调查从 529 名受访者那里收集了数据,这些受访者在过去 3 年内拥有或持续照顾 582 只狗和 402 只猫。还获得了代表邮政编码的中位数家庭收入数据。收容所是猫的最常见来源(p<0.01),也是狗的第二大常见来源。猫更有可能是流浪猫,而狗更有可能是从朋友/家人/邻居、宠物店、饲养者或救援组织获得的,并且更有可能被当作户外宠物饲养(p<0.01)。每个家庭饲养的猫比狗多(狗的平均值=1.32/家庭;猫的平均值=1.78/家庭;p<0.01)。宠物主人最常(在 1-5/5 分李克特量表上)表示很可能会对所有假设的治疗进行管理,尽管猫主人不太可能花时间训练他们的宠物(p=0.05)。猫主人不太可能带他们的宠物去兽医那里接种疫苗或进行年度体检(p<0.01)。收容所获得的猫比流浪猫更有可能被主人带去兽医进行年度检查(p=0.05)。与其他受访者相比,收容所获得宠物的主人至少愿意进行假设的治疗,并愿意为兽医治疗支付≥$1000。来自第 3 号地点的受访者居住在家庭收入中位数相对较低的邮政编码(p<0.01),并且不太可能在宠物上花费≥$1000,而不是其他四个地点的受访者(p<0.01)。超过 90%的宠物主人(从所有获得类别)表示非常高的依恋程度(≥8-10/10 的李克特量表),除了从流浪猫或“其他”类别获得的猫的主人(84.9%)或(75.0%)。调查受访者通常从收容所获得宠物,而那些这样做的人至少愿意为兽医护理付费并提供兽医护理,就像从其他来源获得宠物的受访者一样。收集的数据提供了芝加哥地区调查受访者对宠物获得和护理态度的快照。