Harrod M, Keown A J, Farnworth M J
a Animal Welfare and Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Natural Sciences , Unitec Institute of Technology , Private bag 92025, Auckland 1025 , New Zealand.
b Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 , New Zealand.
N Z Vet J. 2016 Mar;64(2):121-4. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1110064. Epub 2015 Nov 15.
To investigate the use and utility of collars for companion cats in New Zealand, and to explore public perception of collar use.
An online questionnaire was distributed using emails and social media to members of the general public in New Zealand. The questionnaire collected details of respondents, cat ownership status, and responses to a number of questions regarding collar use in cats.
A total of 511 responses were collected. Of these, 393/511 (76.9%) reported owning ≥1 cat at the time of the survey, and 141/393 (35.9%) stated that ≥1 of their cats wore collars and 211/393 (53.7%) had ≥1 of their cats micro-chipped. Of the respondents with a pet cat, 351/393 (89.3%) allowed their cats some outdoor access. Respondents mainly used collars for identification and to reduce predation. Reasons for not using collars included cat intolerance of collars, repeated collar loss and concern over collar safety. Differences were found between cat owners and non-owners regarding whether they agreed that cats were important for pest control (43 vs. 25%, p<0.001); that not all cats will tolerate collars (81 vs. 64%, p<0.001); that cats should be kept indoors at night (37 vs. 58%, p<0.001); or disagreed that well fed cats will not catch birds (60 vs. 70%, p=0.04); and disagreed that a cat without a collar was likely to be a stray (85 vs. 76%, p<0.001). Respondents most trusted veterinarians and the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals as sources of pet care information.
Collar use within this sample of cat owners in New Zealand appeared to be low, with more using microchips for identification. The majority of cat owners in this study indicated their cats had some outdoor access, with collars being used for cat identification and to reduce hunting behaviour. Significant differences existed in opinions on cat management between cat owners and non-owners in this study. It should be noted that this preliminary exploration was based on a self-selected group of respondents and so results and conclusions cannot be extrapolated to the wider population.
As the most trusted source of information about pet care, an enhanced understanding of cat ownership and management may be of use to veterinarians to promote responsible pet ownership and to develop national policies and practices to improve cat welfare.
调查新西兰宠物猫项圈的使用情况及效用,并探究公众对使用项圈的看法。
通过电子邮件和社交媒体向新西兰公众发放在线调查问卷。问卷收集了受访者的详细信息、养猫状况以及对一些关于猫佩戴项圈问题的回答。
共收集到511份回复。其中,393/511(76.9%)的受访者表示在调查时拥有≥1只猫,141/393(35.9%)称其≥1只猫佩戴项圈,211/393(53.7%)的≥1只猫植入了微型芯片。在有宠物猫的受访者中,351/393(89.3%)允许他们的猫外出。受访者主要将项圈用于识别和减少捕食行为。不使用项圈的原因包括猫对项圈不耐受、项圈反复丢失以及对项圈安全的担忧。在猫主人和非猫主人之间,对于猫对害虫控制是否重要(43%对25%,p<0.001);并非所有猫都能耐受项圈(81%对64%,p<0.001);猫晚上应关在室内(37%对58%,p<0.001);或者不同意喂养良好的猫不会抓鸟(60%对70%,p=0.04);以及不同意没有项圈的猫很可能是流浪猫(85%对76%,p<0.001)等问题上存在差异。受访者最信任兽医和防止虐待动物协会作为宠物护理信息来源。
在新西兰这个猫主人样本中,项圈的使用率似乎较低,更多人使用微型芯片进行识别。本研究中的大多数猫主人表示他们的猫有外出机会,项圈用于猫的识别和减少捕猎行为。在本研究中,猫主人和非猫主人在猫管理意见上存在显著差异。应当注意,这项初步探索基于自我选择的受访者群体,因此结果和结论不能外推至更广泛人群。
作为最受信任的宠物护理信息来源,深入了解养猫情况及管理方式可能有助于兽医促进负责任的宠物饲养,并制定国家政策和措施以改善猫的福利。