Love Christopher M, Glassmire David M, Zanolini Shanna Jordan, Wolf Amanda
Patton State Hospital, Patton, CA, USA.
Patton State Hospital, Patton, CA, USA
Assessment. 2014 Oct;21(5):618-27. doi: 10.1177/1073191114528028. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
This study evaluated the specificity and false positive (FP) rates of the Rey 15-Item Test (FIT), Word Recognition Test (WRT), and Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in a sample of 21 forensic inpatients with mild intellectual disability (ID). The FIT demonstrated an FP rate of 23.8% with the standard quantitative cutoff score. Certain qualitative error types on the FIT showed promise and had low FP rates. The WRT obtained an FP rate of 0.0% with previously reported cutoff scores. Finally, the TOMM demonstrated low FP rates of 4.8% and 0.0% on Trial 2 and the Retention Trial, respectively, when applying the standard cutoff score. FP rates are reported for a range of cutoff scores and compared with published research on individuals diagnosed with ID. Results indicated that although the quantitative variables on the FIT had unacceptably high FP rates, the TOMM and WRT had low FP rates, increasing the confidence clinicians can place in scores reflecting poor effort on these measures during ID evaluations.
本研究评估了雷伊15项测验(FIT)、单词识别测验(WRT)和记忆伪装测验(TOMM)在21名轻度智力障碍(ID)法医住院患者样本中的特异性和假阳性(FP)率。采用标准定量临界值时,FIT的假阳性率为23.8%。FIT上某些定性错误类型显示出前景且假阳性率较低。WRT采用先前报告的临界值时假阳性率为0.0%。最后,应用标准临界值时,TOMM在第2次试验和保留试验中的假阳性率分别为4.8%和0.0%。报告了一系列临界值的假阳性率,并与已发表的关于诊断为ID的个体的研究进行了比较。结果表明,虽然FIT上的定量变量假阳性率高得不可接受,但TOMM和WRT的假阳性率较低,这增加了临床医生在ID评估期间对反映这些测量中努力程度不佳的分数的信心。