• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学专业学生在接受教育干预后识别抄袭行为的能力。

Pharmacy students' ability to identify plagiarism after an educational intervention.

作者信息

Degeeter Michelle, Harris Kira, Kehr Heather, Ford Carolyn, Lane Daniel C, Nuzum Donald S, Compton Cynthia, Gibson Whitney

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Wingate University, Hendersonville, NC.

School of Pharmacy, Wingate University, Wingate, NC.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Mar 12;78(2):33. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78233.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe78233
PMID:24672066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3965141/
Abstract

Objective. To determine if an educational intervention in a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) degree program increases pharmacy students' ability to identify plagiarism. Methods. First-year (P1), second-year (P2), and third-year (P3) pharmacy students attended an education session during which types of plagiarism and methods for avoiding plagiarism were reviewed. Students completed a preintervention assessment immediately prior to the session and a postintervention assessment the following semester to measure their ability. Results. Two hundred fifty-two students completed both preintervention and postintervention assessments. There was a 4% increase from preintervention to postintervention in assessment scores for the overall student sample (p<0.05). The mean change was greatest for P1 and P2 students (5% and 4.8%, respectively). Conclusion. An educational intervention about plagiarism can significantly improve students' ability to identify plagiarism.

摘要

目的。确定药学博士(PharmD)学位项目中的教育干预是否能提高药学专业学生识别剽窃行为的能力。方法。一年级(P1)、二年级(P2)和三年级(P3)的药学专业学生参加了一次教育课程,课程中回顾了剽窃的类型和避免剽窃的方法。学生们在课程开始前立即完成了干预前评估,并在下个学期完成了干预后评估,以衡量他们的能力。结果。252名学生完成了干预前和干预后评估。总体学生样本的评估分数从干预前到干预后提高了4%(p<0.05)。P1和P2学生的平均变化最大(分别为5%和4.8%)。结论。关于剽窃的教育干预可以显著提高学生识别剽窃行为的能力。

相似文献

1
Pharmacy students' ability to identify plagiarism after an educational intervention.药学专业学生在接受教育干预后识别抄袭行为的能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Mar 12;78(2):33. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78233.
2
Student Personality Style and First-Year Academic Performance in a Doctor of Pharmacy Program.学生人格风格与药学博士项目一年级学业成绩。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Aug;84(8):ajpe7909. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7909.
3
A Longitudinal Analysis of First Professional Year Pharmacy Student Well-being.药学专业一年级学生福祉的纵向分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7735. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7735.
4
Educational and career goals of pharmacy students upon graduation.药学专业学生毕业后的教育和职业目标。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Nov 12;77(9):187. doi: 10.5688/ajpe779187.
5
Evaluation of an Instrument to Assess Students' Personal and Professional Development During the Faculty Advising Process.评估工具以评估学生在教师指导过程中的个人和专业发展。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):8201. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8201. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
6
Longitudinal study of grit among pharmacy students: Impact of cohort and professional year.药学专业学生毅力的纵向研究:队列和专业年级的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Jul;14(7):835-839. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.027. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
7
Students' Opinions on Summative Team Assessments in a Three-Year Concentrated Pharmacy Curriculum.学生对三年制集中式药学课程终结性团队评估的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Aug 25;80(6):103. doi: 10.5688/ajpe806103.
8
A Didactic Community Pharmacy Course to Improve Pharmacy Students' Clinical Skills and Business Management Knowledge.一个以教学为目的的社区药房课程,旨在提高药学学生的临床技能和商业管理知识。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6581. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6581.
9
Integration of cannabidiol oil education into a pharmacy therapeutics curriculum.将大麻二酚油教育纳入药学治疗学课程。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Dec;12(12):1424-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
A mentor-based portfolio program to evaluate pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.基于导师的作品集计划评估药学学生的自我评估技能。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):81. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77481.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and level of digital literacy among students receiving health-based education.接受健康教育的学生的数字素养意识和水平。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05025-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The status of academic integrity amongst nursing students at a nursing education institution in the Western Cape.西开普省一所护理教育机构中护理专业学生的学术诚信状况。
Curationis. 2012 Jun 20;35(1):27. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v35i1.27.
2
Retracted publications in the drug literature.药物文献中的已撤回出版物。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):586-95. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01100.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
3
Plagiarism among applicants for faculty positions.教师职位申请者中的抄袭现象。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):211. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510211.
4
Plagiarism: using a collaborative approach in an online allied health professions course.抄袭:在在线辅助健康专业课程中采用协作方法。
Nurse Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182383701.
5
Plagiarism: a case study of quality improvement in a taught postgraduate programme.抄袭:一个教学型研究生课程质量改进的案例研究。
Med Teach. 2011;33(7):e375-81. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.579201.
6
Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism.教育手段以杜绝抄袭。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.014.
7
Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students' perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty.本科生和研究生药学学生对剽窃和学术诚信的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):105. doi: 10.5688/aj7306105.
8
Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation.护理学校的学术不端行为:一项实证研究。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Nov;48(11):614-23. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090716-07. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
9
Plagiarism in graduate medical education.研究生医学教育中的抄袭行为。
Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):436-8.
10
Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students.医学生中抄袭行为的发生率。
Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):126-31.