• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经右侧桡动脉途径进行右冠状动脉造影时,工作台重塑型AR1改良导管的优势。

Advantages of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter for right coronary angiography by right radial approach.

作者信息

Baldi Cesare, Mirra Marco, Di Maio Marco, Attisano Tiziana, Di Muro Michele Roberto, Vigorito Francesco, Farina Rosario, Polito Maria Vincenza, Giudice Pietro, Piscione Federico

出版信息

Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014 Mar;6(1):19-25. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.1.3. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.1.3
PMID:24672671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3955811/
Abstract

Transradial approach in cardiac catheterization is increasing. In daily practice, coronary angiography via radial artery is usually performed by using catheters designed for femoral approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate advantages in the use of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter, in terms of procedural duration time, number of catheters per procedure, fluoroscopy time, contrast agent administered volume, images quality and costs. Two hundred patients, submitted to coronary angiography via right radial artery in our institution, have been retrospectively reviewed. Patients have been divided in two groups, depending on whether a workbench reshaped Cordis Amplatz AR1 mod catheter (rAR1 mod), or catheters in their original shape (OC) have been employed. In the rAR1 mod group (100 patients) a lower number of catheters per procedure (1.07 ± 0.25 vs. 1.47 ± 1.65; p < 0.001), a more frequent right coronary selective engagement (76.76% vs. 53.12%; p < 0.001), a smaller amount of contrast agent (63.02 ± 27.77 vs. 80.85 ± 29.22 ml, p < 0.001), a reduced fluoroscopy and global procedural time (4.19 ± 2.91 vs. 5.69 ± 3.85 min, p = 0.004; and 34.58 ± 17.05 vs. 42.58 ± 17.26 min, p = 0.001, respectively) were observed. According to our experience, when right coronary angiography via right radial approach is performed, the utilization of rAR1 mod catheter correlates with multiple advantages in terms of procedural parameters.

摘要

心脏导管插入术中经桡动脉途径的应用正在增加。在日常实践中,经桡动脉进行冠状动脉造影通常使用为股动脉途径设计的导管。本研究的目的是评估在操作持续时间、每次操作的导管数量、透视时间、造影剂用量、图像质量和成本方面,使用工作台重塑的AR1 mod导管的优势。对在我们机构接受经右桡动脉冠状动脉造影的200例患者进行了回顾性分析。根据是否使用工作台重塑的Cordis Amplatz AR1 mod导管(rAR1 mod)或原始形状的导管(OC),将患者分为两组。在rAR1 mod组(100例患者)中,观察到每次操作的导管数量较少(1.07±0.25对1.47±1.65;p<0.001),右冠状动脉选择性插管更频繁(76.76%对53.12%;p<0.001),造影剂用量较少(63.02±27.77对80.85±29.22 ml,p<0.001),透视和总操作时间缩短(分别为4.19±2.91对5.69±3.85分钟,p=0.004;34.58±17.05对42.58±17.26分钟,p=0.001)。根据我们的经验,当经右桡动脉途径进行右冠状动脉造影时,使用rAR1 mod导管在操作参数方面具有多种优势。

相似文献

1
Advantages of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter for right coronary angiography by right radial approach.经右侧桡动脉途径进行右冠状动脉造影时,工作台重塑型AR1改良导管的优势。
Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014 Mar;6(1):19-25. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.1.3. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
2
Comparison of Standard Catheters Versus Radial Artery-Specific Catheter in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Angiography Through Transradial Access.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影患者中标准导管与桡动脉专用导管的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;118(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 17.
3
Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.专门为经右桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉而设计的新型诊断导管。Tiger II导管与Judkins导管的前瞻性随机试验。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006 Jun-Aug;22(3-4):295-303. doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-9029-8. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
4
Randomized comparison of transradial coronary angiography via right or left radial artery approaches.经右或左桡动脉入路行随机化冠状动脉造影术的对比研究。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jan 15;107(2):195-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.065. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
5
Effectiveness of Left Judkins Catheter as a Single Multipurpose Catheter in Transradial Coronary Angiography From Right Radial Artery: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Two-Catheter Strategy.左Judkins导管作为经右桡动脉行冠状动脉造影单一多功能导管的有效性:与传统双导管策略的随机对照研究
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Jun;29(3):257-64. doi: 10.1111/joic.12286. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
6
Effectiveness of Handmade "Jacky-Like Catheter" As a Single Multipurpose Catheter in Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Comparison With Conventional Two-Catheter Strategy.手工制作的“类杰基导管”作为单根多功能导管在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中的有效性:与传统双导管策略的随机对照比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Feb;30(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/joic.12350. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
7
Impact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costs.TIG I 导管单导管策略对冠状动脉造影性能和经济成本的影响。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Nov;113(5):960-968. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190232.
8
Left radial versus right radial approach for coronary artery catheterization: a prospective comparison.左桡动脉与右桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影:前瞻性比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Apr;25(2):203-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00689.x. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography.右桡动脉或左桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影的有效性
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Mar;61(3):333-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10769.
10
Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases.股动脉入路禁忌患者的桡动脉冠状动脉造影:500例分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jan;61(1):60-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10708.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality reduction with transradial approach in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: is the randomized evidence conclusive?经桡动脉途径对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡率的降低作用:随机对照证据是否确凿?
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1578-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.051. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
2
Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.经皮心血管介入治疗中桡动脉入路的共识文件:欧洲经皮心血管介入治疗协会和急性心脏护理工作组以及欧洲心脏病学会血栓形成工作组的立场文件。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Mar;8(11):1242-51. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I11A192.
3
Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.急性冠状动脉综合征伴或不伴 ST 段抬高患者经桡动脉与股动脉入路的效果比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
4
Comparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of transradial coronary angiography via right versus left radial artery approaches (from the PREVAIL Study).经右桡动脉与左桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影的可行性和有效性比较(来自 PREVAIL 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 15;110(6):771-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 30.
5
Right versus left transradial approach for coronary catheterization in octogenarian patients.高龄患者经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术的右利手与左利手比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):267-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23474. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-adjusted and -matched analysis from the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) multicenter registry.经桡动脉与经股动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的比较:来自 REAL(艾米利亚-罗马涅地区血管成形术登记研究)多中心注册研究的倾向评分调整和匹配分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan;5(1):23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.018.
7
Incidence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time coronary angiography.首次冠状动脉造影检查的心房颤动患者的冠状动脉疾病发生率和严重程度。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024964. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Impact of transradial and transfemoral coronary interventions on bleeding and net adverse clinical events in acute coronary syndromes.经桡动脉和股动脉冠状动脉介入治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征出血和净不良临床事件的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2011 May;7(1):91-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I1A16.
9
Evaluation of the "learning curve" for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary procedures.评价经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中左侧和右侧桡动脉入路的“学习曲线”。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 15;108(2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
10
Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的经桡动脉入路(左侧 vs 右侧)和操作时间:TALENT 研究。
Am Heart J. 2011 Jan;161(1):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.003.