Suppr超能文献

经右侧桡动脉途径进行右冠状动脉造影时,工作台重塑型AR1改良导管的优势。

Advantages of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter for right coronary angiography by right radial approach.

作者信息

Baldi Cesare, Mirra Marco, Di Maio Marco, Attisano Tiziana, Di Muro Michele Roberto, Vigorito Francesco, Farina Rosario, Polito Maria Vincenza, Giudice Pietro, Piscione Federico

出版信息

Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014 Mar;6(1):19-25. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.1.3. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

Abstract

Transradial approach in cardiac catheterization is increasing. In daily practice, coronary angiography via radial artery is usually performed by using catheters designed for femoral approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate advantages in the use of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter, in terms of procedural duration time, number of catheters per procedure, fluoroscopy time, contrast agent administered volume, images quality and costs. Two hundred patients, submitted to coronary angiography via right radial artery in our institution, have been retrospectively reviewed. Patients have been divided in two groups, depending on whether a workbench reshaped Cordis Amplatz AR1 mod catheter (rAR1 mod), or catheters in their original shape (OC) have been employed. In the rAR1 mod group (100 patients) a lower number of catheters per procedure (1.07 ± 0.25 vs. 1.47 ± 1.65; p < 0.001), a more frequent right coronary selective engagement (76.76% vs. 53.12%; p < 0.001), a smaller amount of contrast agent (63.02 ± 27.77 vs. 80.85 ± 29.22 ml, p < 0.001), a reduced fluoroscopy and global procedural time (4.19 ± 2.91 vs. 5.69 ± 3.85 min, p = 0.004; and 34.58 ± 17.05 vs. 42.58 ± 17.26 min, p = 0.001, respectively) were observed. According to our experience, when right coronary angiography via right radial approach is performed, the utilization of rAR1 mod catheter correlates with multiple advantages in terms of procedural parameters.

摘要

心脏导管插入术中经桡动脉途径的应用正在增加。在日常实践中,经桡动脉进行冠状动脉造影通常使用为股动脉途径设计的导管。本研究的目的是评估在操作持续时间、每次操作的导管数量、透视时间、造影剂用量、图像质量和成本方面,使用工作台重塑的AR1 mod导管的优势。对在我们机构接受经右桡动脉冠状动脉造影的200例患者进行了回顾性分析。根据是否使用工作台重塑的Cordis Amplatz AR1 mod导管(rAR1 mod)或原始形状的导管(OC),将患者分为两组。在rAR1 mod组(100例患者)中,观察到每次操作的导管数量较少(1.07±0.25对1.47±1.65;p<0.001),右冠状动脉选择性插管更频繁(76.76%对53.12%;p<0.001),造影剂用量较少(63.02±27.77对80.85±29.22 ml,p<0.001),透视和总操作时间缩短(分别为4.19±2.91对5.69±3.85分钟,p=0.004;34.58±17.05对42.58±17.26分钟,p=0.001)。根据我们的经验,当经右桡动脉途径进行右冠状动脉造影时,使用rAR1 mod导管在操作参数方面具有多种优势。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验