Suppr超能文献

腔内注射博来霉素和短小棒状杆菌控制恶性胸腔积液的随机试验。

A randomized trial of intracavitary bleomycin and Corynebacterium parvum in the control of malignant pleural effusions.

作者信息

Ostrowski M J, Priestman T J, Houston R F, Martin W M

机构信息

Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, U.K.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 1989 Jan;14(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90004-2.

Abstract

Fifty-eight patients with malignant pleural effusions were entered into a prospectively randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a local instillation of bleomycin or corynebacterium parvum (C. parvum) in controlling fluid reaccumulation after simple needle aspiration (thoracentesis). The response was assessed at 30 days by chest X-ray and clinical examination. There were 44 evaluable patients; 18 of 25 (72%) of those receiving bleomycin and 9/19 (47%) of those who had C. parvum gained a complete or partial response. This difference in response rate was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). The majority of patients had an effusion from a primary breast carcinoma and the response in this group was almost statistically significant (p = 0.06) with 74% of bleomycin patients and 43% of C. parvum patients responding. Fever following instillation was more common with C. parvum (53% of patients compared with 24% after bleomycin, p = 0.02), whereas nausea was more common after bleomycin (28% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.16). Local chest pain after aspiration occurred in 52% of the bleomycin group and 47% of the C. parvum subjects. There was no significant difference between the groups in age, sex, tumour type, presenting symptoms, volume of aspirate, systemic therapy or number of previous aspirations. Both of these agents appeared to be active in the control of malignant pleural effusions although the response rate was higher with bleomycin and overall, both have acceptable levels of toxicity.

摘要

58例恶性胸腔积液患者进入一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较博来霉素或短小棒状杆菌局部注入在单纯胸腔穿刺抽液后控制液体再积聚的疗效。在30天时通过胸部X线和临床检查评估反应。有44例可评估患者;接受博来霉素治疗的25例中有18例(72%)、接受短小棒状杆菌治疗的19例中有9例(47%)获得完全或部分反应。反应率的这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.13)。大多数患者的胸腔积液来自原发性乳腺癌,该组的反应几乎具有统计学意义(p = 0.06),博来霉素治疗患者的反应率为74%,短小棒状杆菌治疗患者为43%。注入后发热在短小棒状杆菌组更常见(53%的患者,而博来霉素后为24%,p = 0.02),而恶心在博来霉素后更常见(28%对10.5%,p = 0.16)。博来霉素组52%的患者和短小棒状杆菌组47%的患者在穿刺后出现局部胸痛。两组在年龄、性别、肿瘤类型、出现的症状、抽液量、全身治疗或既往穿刺次数方面无显著差异。这两种药物在控制恶性胸腔积液方面似乎都有活性,尽管博来霉素的反应率更高,总体而言,两者的毒性水平都可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验