Suppr超能文献

验证《重症监护病房老年急诊患者意识模糊评估方法》在老年急诊患者中的适用性。

Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in older emergency department patients.

机构信息

Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):180-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12309.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In the emergency department (ED), health care providers miss delirium approximately 75% of the time, because they do not routinely screen for this syndrome. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) is a brief (<1 minute) delirium assessment that may be feasible for use in the ED. The study objective was to determine its validity and reliability in older ED patients.

METHODS

In this prospective observational cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older were enrolled at an academic, tertiary care ED from July 2009 to February 2012. An emergency physician (EP) and research assistants (RAs) performed the CAM-ICU. The reference standard for delirium was a comprehensive (~30 minutes) psychiatrist assessment using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria. All assessments were blinded to each other and were conducted within 3 hours. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios were calculated for both the EP and the RAs using the psychiatrist's assessment as the reference standard. Kappa values between the EP and RAs were also calculated to measure reliability.

RESULTS

Of 406 patients enrolled, 50 (12.3%) had delirium. The median age was 73.5 years old (interquartile range [IQR] = 69 to 80 years), 202 (49.8%) were female, and 57 (14.0%) were nonwhite. The CAM-ICU's sensitivities were 72.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 58.3% to 82.5%) and 68.0% (95% CI = 54.2% to 79.2%) in the EP and RAs, respectively. The CAM-ICU's specificity was 98.6% (95% CI = 96.8% to 99.4%) for both raters. The negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.18 to 0.44) and 0.32 (95% CI = 0.22 to 0.49) in the EP and RAs, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios (LR+) were 51.3 (95% CI = 21.1 to 124.5) and 48.4 (95% CI = 19.9 to 118.0), respectively. The kappa between the EP and RAs was 0.92 (95% CI = 0.85 to 0.98), indicating excellent interobserver reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

In older ED patients, the CAM-ICU is highly specific, and a positive test is nearly diagnostic for delirium when used by both the EP and RAs. However, the CAM-ICU's sensitivity was modest, and a negative test decreased the likelihood of delirium by a small amount. The consequences of a false-negative CAM-ICU are unknown and deserve further study.

摘要

目的

在急诊科 (ED),医护人员大约有 75%的时间会错过谵妄,因为他们没有常规筛查这种综合征。《重症监护病房谵妄评估方法》(CAM-ICU)是一种简短(<1 分钟)的谵妄评估方法,可能适用于 ED。本研究的目的是确定其在老年 ED 患者中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

在这项前瞻性观察队列研究中,2009 年 7 月至 2012 年 2 月,在一家学术性三级护理 ED 招募了 65 岁或以上的患者。急诊医师 (EP) 和研究助理 (RA) 进行了 CAM-ICU 评估。谵妄的参考标准是使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版标准进行全面 (~30 分钟) 精神科评估。所有评估均相互盲法进行,且在 3 小时内完成。使用精神病医生的评估作为参考标准,计算 EP 和 RA 的敏感度、特异度和阳性似然比。EP 和 RA 之间的 kapp 值也用于衡量可靠性。

结果

在纳入的 406 名患者中,有 50 名 (12.3%) 患有谵妄。中位年龄为 73.5 岁 (四分位距 [IQR] = 69 至 80 岁),202 名 (49.8%) 为女性,57 名 (14.0%) 为非白人。CAM-ICU 的敏感度分别为 EP 和 RA 的 72.0% (95%置信区间 [CI] = 58.3%至 82.5%) 和 68.0% (95% CI = 54.2%至 79.2%)。CAM-ICU 的特异性对于两个评估者均为 98.6% (95% CI = 96.8%至 99.4%)。阴性似然比 (LR-) 分别为 EP 和 RA 的 0.28 (95% CI = 0.18 至 0.44) 和 0.32 (95% CI = 0.22 至 0.49)。阳性似然比 (LR+) 分别为 EP 和 RA 的 51.3 (95% CI = 21.1 至 124.5) 和 48.4 (95% CI = 19.9 至 118.0)。EP 和 RA 之间的 kapp 值为 0.92 (95% CI = 0.85 至 0.98),表明观察者间具有极好的可靠性。

结论

在老年 ED 患者中,CAM-ICU 具有高度的特异性,当 EP 和 RA 均使用时,阳性试验几乎可以确诊谵妄。然而,CAM-ICU 的敏感度适中,阴性试验可少量降低谵妄的可能性。假阴性 CAM-ICU 的后果尚不清楚,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

4
Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 29;9:879-85. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S62660. eCollection 2014.
8
9
Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes.
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;16(3):193-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00339.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of postoperative delirium by family and caregivers: Evaluation of the family confusion assessment method (FAM-CAM).
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Sep;106:111963. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111963. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
Hospital 4Ms: Documentation and association with patient characteristics.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jan;73(1):172-181. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19205. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Delirium screening in the emergency department: evaluation and intervention.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Apr 2;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00603-1.
6
Thirty-day mortality among patients with acute delirium in the emergency department.
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 29;9(10):e20554. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20554. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of the Dutch version of the 4AT for delirium detection in a mixed patient population and setting.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Aug;35(8):1705-1710. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02447-2. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Emergency Department Length of Stay Is Associated with Delirium in Older Adults.
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 3;24(3):532-537. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59383.
10
Risk factors for postoperative delirium in geriatric patients with hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;14:960364. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.960364. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Delirium and Long-term Cognitive Trajectory Among Persons With Dementia.
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Sep 24;172(17):1324-31. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3203.
3
Cognitive trajectories after postoperative delirium.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):30-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112923.
6
Delirium in older emergency department patients is an independent predictor of hospital length of stay.
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 May;18(5):451-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01065.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
8
Evaluation of two intensive care delirium screening tools for non-critically ill hospitalized patients.
Psychosomatics. 2011 Mar-Apr;52(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2010.12.018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验