Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jan-Mar;1(1):2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2010.10.001. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
There is a growing interest in the evolving nature of safety challenges in radiation oncology. Understandably, there has been a great deal of focus on the mechanical and computer aspects of new high-technology treatments (eg, intensity-modulated radiation therapy). However, safety concerns are not limited to dose calculations and data transfer associated with advanced technologies. They also stem from fundamental changes in our workflow (eg, multiple hand-offs), the relative loss of some traditional "end of the line" quality assurance tools (port films and light fields), condensed fractionation schedules, and an under-appreciation for the physical limitations of new techniques. Furthermore, changes in our workspace and tools (eg, electronic records, planning systems), and workloads (eg, billing, insurance, regulations) may have unforeseen effects on safety. Safety initiatives need to acknowledge the multiple factors affecting risk. Our current challenges will not be adequately addressed simply by defining new policies and procedures. Rather, we need to understand the frequency and causes of errors better, particularly those that are most likely to cause harm. Then we can incorporate principles into our workspace that minimize these risks (eg, automation, standardization, checklists, redundancy, and consideration of "human factors" in the design of products and workspaces). Opportunities to enhance safety involve providing support through diligent examinations of staffing, schedules, communications, teamwork, and work environments. We need to develop a culture of safety in which all team members are alerted to the possibility of harm, and they all work together to maximize safety. The goal is not to eliminate every error. Rather, we should focus our attention on conditions (eg, rushing) that can cause real patient harm, and/or those conditions that reflect systemic problems that might lead to errors more likely to cause harm. Ongoing changes in clinical practice mandate continued vigilance to minimize the risks of error, combined with new, nontraditional approaches to create a safer patient environment.
人们对放射肿瘤学中安全挑战的演变性质越来越感兴趣。可以理解的是,人们非常关注新技术治疗的机械和计算机方面(例如,强度调制放射治疗)。然而,安全问题不仅限于与先进技术相关的剂量计算和数据传输。它们还源于我们工作流程的根本变化(例如,多次交接),一些传统的“质量控制终点”工具(端口胶片和光野)相对丢失,分割剂量缩短,以及对新技术的物理限制认识不足。此外,我们的工作空间和工具(例如,电子记录、规划系统)以及工作量(例如,计费、保险、法规)的变化可能对安全性产生意想不到的影响。安全计划需要认识到影响风险的多个因素。我们目前的挑战仅通过定义新的政策和程序是无法充分解决的。相反,我们需要更好地了解错误的频率和原因,特别是那些最有可能造成伤害的错误。然后,我们可以将原则纳入我们的工作空间,以最大程度地降低这些风险(例如,自动化、标准化、检查表、冗余以及在产品和工作空间设计中考虑“人为因素”)。提高安全性的机会涉及通过仔细检查人员配备、时间表、沟通、团队合作和工作环境来提供支持。我们需要建立一种安全文化,使所有团队成员都意识到伤害的可能性,并且他们共同努力以最大程度地提高安全性。目标不是消除每个错误。相反,我们应该关注可能导致实际患者伤害的条件(例如,匆忙),以及那些反映可能导致更可能造成伤害的错误的系统性问题的条件。临床实践的持续变化要求持续保持警惕,以最大程度地降低错误风险,并采取新的非传统方法来创造更安全的患者环境。