Global Health & Health Policy Program, Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
This paper details how exposure to new clinics, diagnostic technologies, and pharmaceuticals during humanitarian relief operations in the Somali Region of Ethiopia shaped local pluralistic health systems and altered the ways in which residents subsequently conceived of and treated illness and disease. Despite rising demand for pharmaceuticals and diagnostic technologies among Somalis in Ethiopia, local ethnophysiologies continued to draw upon popular ideas about humoral flows, divine action, and spirit possession. Demands for therapeutic camel milk, Qur'anic spiritual healing, herbal remedies, and other historically popular therapies persisted, but were shaped by concurrent demands for and understandings of diagnostic biotechnologies and pharmaceutical medications. The reverse was also true: contemporary understandings and uses of non-biomedical healing modalities among Somalis shaped evaluations of clinical care, including healthcare during humanitarian responses. To illustrate these phenomena, based on ethnographic research in eastern Ethiopia between 2007 and 2009, this paper explores three topics vital to Somalis' pluralistic healthcare systems: camel milk and the management of digestive bile; women's experiences and clinical presentations with pain and disorder in their reproductive systems; and the rising popularity of high-tech diagnostic tests. I conclude that medical humanitarian aid never happens in a vacuum or among truly treatment-naïve populations. Instead, aid unfolds within ever-changing and pluralistic health cultures, and it permanently alters and is altered by the frames within which people evaluate and make future decisions about healthcare.
本文详细介绍了在埃塞俄比亚索马里地区的人道主义救援行动中,新诊所、诊断技术和药品的出现如何塑造当地多元化的卫生系统,并改变了居民随后对疾病的概念和治疗方式。尽管埃塞俄比亚索马里地区对药品和诊断技术的需求不断增加,但当地的民族生理学仍然借鉴了关于体液流动、神圣行动和精神附身的流行观念。对治疗性骆驼奶、《古兰经》的精神治疗、草药治疗和其他历史上流行的治疗方法的需求仍然存在,但同时也受到诊断生物技术和药物治疗需求和理解的影响。反之亦然:索马里人对非生物医学治疗方式的当代理解和使用也影响了对临床护理的评估,包括人道主义应对期间的医疗保健。为了说明这些现象,本文基于 2007 年至 2009 年在埃塞俄比亚东部的民族志研究,探讨了三个对索马里多元化医疗保健系统至关重要的主题:骆驼奶和消化胆汁的管理;妇女在生殖系统疼痛和紊乱方面的经历和临床表现;以及高科技诊断测试的日益普及。本文得出结论,医疗人道主义援助从未在真空中或在真正未经治疗的人群中进行。相反,援助在不断变化和多元化的卫生文化中展开,并通过人们评估和未来医疗保健决策的框架永久改变和被改变。