• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲各地为患有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性皮肤和软组织感染的住院患者提供了早期转换/早期出院的机会。

Pan-European early switch/early discharge opportunities exist for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

机构信息

Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Oct;20(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12632. Epub 2014 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/1469-0691.12632
PMID:24673973
Abstract

The objective of this study was to document pan-European real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource use and estimate opportunities for early switch (ES) from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics and early discharge (ED) in hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). This retrospective observational medical chart review study enrolled 342 physicians across 12 European countries who collected data from 1542 patients with documented MRSA cSSTI who were hospitalized (July 2010 to June 2011) and discharged alive (by July 2011). Data included clinical characteristics and outcomes, hospital length of stay (LOS), MRSA-targeted IV and oral antibiotic use, and ES and ED eligibility according to literature-based and expert-validated criteria. The most frequent initial MRSA-active antibiotics were vancomycin (50.2%), linezolid (15.1%), clindamycin (10.8%), and teicoplanin (10.4%). Patients discharged with MRSA-active antibiotics (n = 480) were most frequently prescribed linezolid (42.1%) and clindamycin (19.8%). IV treatment duration (9.3 ± 6.5 vs. 14.6 ± 9.9 days; p <0.001) and hospital LOS (19.1 ± 12.9 vs. 21.0 ± 18.2 days; p 0.162) tended to be shorter for patients switched from IV to oral treatment than for patients who received IV treatment only. Of the patients, 33.6% met ES criteria and could have discontinued IV treatment 6.0 ± 5.5 days earlier, and 37.9% met ED criteria and could have been discharged 6.2 ± 8.2 days earlier. More than one-third of European patients hospitalized for MRSA cSSTI could be eligible for ES and ED, resulting in substantial reductions in IV days and bed-days, with potential savings of €2000 per ED-eligible patient.

摘要

本研究的目的是记录欧洲范围内的真实世界治疗模式和医疗资源的使用情况,并评估耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)合并皮肤和软组织感染(cSSTI)住院患者中从静脉(IV)向口服抗生素转换(ES)和提前出院(ED)的机会。这项回顾性观察性医学图表审查研究纳入了来自欧洲 12 个国家的 342 名医生,他们从 1542 名确诊为 MRSA cSSTI 并住院(2010 年 7 月至 2011 年 6 月)且存活出院(截至 2011 年 7 月)的患者中收集数据。数据包括临床特征和结局、住院时间(LOS)、MRSA 靶向 IV 和口服抗生素的使用以及根据文献和专家验证的标准确定的 ES 和 ED 资格。初始使用的最常见的 MRSA 活性抗生素为万古霉素(50.2%)、利奈唑胺(15.1%)、克林霉素(10.8%)和替考拉宁(10.4%)。出院时使用 MRSA 活性抗生素的患者(n=480)最常被处方利奈唑胺(42.1%)和克林霉素(19.8%)。与仅接受 IV 治疗的患者相比,从 IV 转换为口服治疗的患者的 IV 治疗持续时间(9.3±6.5 vs. 14.6±9.9 天;p<0.001)和住院 LOS(19.1±12.9 vs. 21.0±18.2 天;p=0.162)往往更短。符合 ES 标准的患者占 33.6%,可以提前 6.0±5.5 天停止 IV 治疗,符合 ED 标准的患者占 37.9%,可以提前 6.2±8.2 天出院。超过三分之一的欧洲 MRSA cSSTI 住院患者符合 ES 和 ED 的标准,这将使 IV 天数和住院天数大幅减少,每位 ED 合格患者的潜在节省费用为 2000 欧元。

相似文献

1
Pan-European early switch/early discharge opportunities exist for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections.欧洲各地为患有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性皮肤和软组织感染的住院患者提供了早期转换/早期出院的机会。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Oct;20(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12632. Epub 2014 May 15.
2
Antibiotic treatment patterns across Europe in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a plea for implementation of early switch and early discharge criteria.欧洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致复杂性皮肤软组织感染患者的抗生素治疗模式:呼吁实施早期转换和早期出院标准。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jul;44(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 16.
3
Influence of real-world characteristics on outcomes for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections: a multi-country medical chart review in Europe.现实特征对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染患者结局的影响:一项在欧洲多国进行的基于病历的回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 2;14:476. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-476.
4
Early switch/early discharge opportunities for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections in Brazil.巴西耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌合并皮肤软组织感染住院患者的早期转归/提前出院机会。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Early-switch/early-discharge opportunities for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections: proof of concept in the United Arab Emirates.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性皮肤和软组织感染住院患者的早期转换/早期出院机会:阿拉伯联合酋长国的概念验证
Infect Drug Resist. 2015 Jun 18;8:173-9. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S78786. eCollection 2015.
6
Comparison of vancomycin and linezolid in patients with peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes in an observational European study of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.一项观察性的、针对欧洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂性皮肤和软组织感染患者的研究显示,万古霉素和利奈唑胺在伴有外周血管疾病和/或糖尿病的患者中的疗效比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl 2:S33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
7
Early switch/early discharge opportunities for hospitalized patients with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections: Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌合并皮肤软组织感染住院患者的早期转换/提前出院机会:沙特阿拉伯和阿拉伯联合酋长国。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Aug;13(8):1126-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Weight-based antibiotic dosing in a real-world European study of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.一项真实世界的欧洲研究:基于体重的抗生素剂量方案在治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂性皮肤软组织感染中的应用。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl 2:S40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.030. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Clinical efficacy of oral linezolid compared with intravenous vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, case-control analysis.口服利奈唑胺与静脉万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌合并皮肤软组织感染的临床疗效:回顾性、倾向评分匹配、病例对照分析。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1667-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
10
Resource use in patients hospitalized with complicated skin and soft tissue infections in Europe and analysis of vulnerable groups: the REACH study.欧洲复杂皮肤和软组织感染住院患者的资源利用及弱势群体分析:REACH研究
J Med Econ. 2014 Oct;17(10):719-29. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.940423. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing thermal imaging and non-contact infrared thermometers for monitoring skin temperature in a prospective cohort with lower limb cellulitis.在前瞻性队列研究中比较热成像和非接触式红外体温计监测下肢蜂窝织炎患者的皮肤温度。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 18;15(7):e100667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100667.
2
Real-world effectiveness of omadacycline and impact of unapproved omadacycline prescription claims among adult outpatients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.奥马环素在成人社区获得性细菌性肺炎或急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染门诊患者中的真实世界疗效和未经批准的奥马环素处方索赔的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Aug;29(8):952-964. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22454. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Oral minocycline plus rifampicin versus oral linezolid for complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-resistant : The AIDA open label, randomized, controlled Phase 4 trial.口服米诺环素联合利福平与口服利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染:AIDA开放标签、随机、对照4期试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Dec 26;56:101790. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101790. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Point prevalence study of antibiotic appropriateness and possibility of early discharge from hospital among patients treated with antibiotics in a Swiss University Hospital.瑞士大学医院接受抗生素治疗的患者的抗生素使用适宜性和提前出院可能性的时点患病率研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 May 7;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01104-z.
5
Discharge Home After Transition to Oral Antibiotics: No Jeopardy.转为口服抗生素治疗后出院回家:无风险。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Nov;10(11):e11-e13. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000752. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
The Real-World Economic and Clinical Management of Adult Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs) with Oritavancin: Data from Two Multicenter Observational Cohort Studies.奥瑞他万星用于成人皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)患者的真实世界经济与临床管理:来自两项多中心观察性队列研究的数据
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020 Jun;7(Suppl 1):6-12. doi: 10.1007/s40801-020-00199-3.
7
Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Economic aspects of antibiotic treatment.细菌性感染的肠外初始治疗方案计算:抗生素治疗的经济层面
GMS Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 26;8:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/id000047. eCollection 2020.
8
Oral or intravenous antibiotics?口服抗生素还是静脉注射抗生素?
Aust Prescr. 2020 Apr;43(2):45-48. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.008. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Increasing the documentation of 48-hour antimicrobial reviews.增加48小时抗菌药物评估的记录。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Feb;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000805.
10
Cost-Saving Opportunities with an Oral and Intravenous Once-Daily Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic for Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: Findings from Decision-Analytic Models.口服和静脉注射每日一次氨甲基环素抗生素用于社区获得性细菌性肺炎住院患者的成本节约机会:决策分析模型的结果
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019 Jun-Jul;12(4):168-176.