• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致复杂性皮肤软组织感染患者的抗生素治疗模式:呼吁实施早期转换和早期出院标准。

Antibiotic treatment patterns across Europe in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a plea for implementation of early switch and early discharge criteria.

机构信息

Klinikum Peine and Medical University Hannover, Peine, Germany.

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jul;44(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.007
PMID:24928311
Abstract

This retrospective observational medical chart review aimed to describe country-specific variations across Europe in real-world meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (cSSTI) treatment patterns, antibiotic stewardship activity, and potential opportunities for early switch (ES) from intravenous (i.v.) to oral formulations and early discharge (ED) from hospital using standardised data collection and criteria and economic implications of these opportunities. Patients were randomly sampled from 12 countries (Austria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain and the UK), aged ≥18 years, with documented MRSA cSSTI, hospitalised between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2011, discharged alive by 31 July 2011. Of 1502 patients, 1468 received MRSA-targeted therapy. Intravenous-to-oral switch rates ranged from 2.0% to 20.2%, i.v. length of therapy from 10.1 to 18.6 days and hospital length of stay (LoS) from 15.2 to 25.0 days across Europe. Of 341 sites, 82.9% had antibiotic steering committees, 23.7% had i.v.-to-oral switch antibiotic protocols and 12.9% had ED protocols for MRSA cSSTI. ES and ED eligibility ranged from 12.0% (Slovakia) to 56.3% (Greece) and from 10% (Slovakia) to 48.2% (Portugal), respectively. Potential cost savings per ED-eligible patient ranged from €414 (Slovakia) to €2703 (France). MRSA cSSTI treatment patterns varied widely across countries, but further reductions in i.v. therapy, hospital LoS and associated costs could be realised. These data provide insight into clinical practice patterns across diverse European healthcare systems and identify potential opportunities for local clinicians and policy-makers to improve clinical care and cost-effectiveness of this therapeutic area.

摘要

本回顾性观察性医学图表回顾旨在描述欧洲各国耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)复杂皮肤和软组织感染(cSSTI)治疗模式、抗生素管理活动以及从静脉(i.v.)向口服制剂早期转换(ES)和提前出院(ED)的潜在机会,采用标准化数据收集和标准,并评估这些机会的经济意义。从 12 个国家(奥地利、捷克共和国、法国、德国、希腊、爱尔兰、意大利、波兰、葡萄牙、斯洛伐克、西班牙和英国)中随机抽取患者,年龄≥18 岁,有记录的 MRSA cSSTI,住院时间为 2010 年 7 月 1 日至 2011 年 6 月 30 日,2011 年 7 月 31 日前存活出院。在 1502 名患者中,1468 名接受了针对 MRSA 的治疗。静脉向口服转换率范围为 2.0%至 20.2%,静脉治疗时间为 10.1 至 18.6 天,住院时间为 15.2 至 25.0 天。在 341 个地点中,82.9%有抗生素管理委员会,23.7%有静脉向口服转换抗生素方案,12.9%有针对 MRSA cSSTI 的提前出院方案。ES 和 ED 的合格标准为 12.0%(斯洛伐克)至 56.3%(希腊)和 10%(斯洛伐克)至 48.2%(葡萄牙)。每位 ED 合格患者的潜在节省成本范围为 414 欧元(斯洛伐克)至 2703 欧元(法国)。MRSA cSSTI 的治疗模式在各国之间差异很大,但可以进一步减少静脉治疗、住院时间和相关成本。这些数据提供了对不同欧洲医疗保健系统中临床实践模式的深入了解,并确定了当地临床医生和政策制定者在改善该治疗领域的临床护理和成本效益方面的潜在机会。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic treatment patterns across Europe in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a plea for implementation of early switch and early discharge criteria.欧洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致复杂性皮肤软组织感染患者的抗生素治疗模式:呼吁实施早期转换和早期出院标准。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jul;44(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 16.
2
Pan-European early switch/early discharge opportunities exist for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections.欧洲各地为患有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性皮肤和软组织感染的住院患者提供了早期转换/早期出院的机会。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Oct;20(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12632. Epub 2014 May 15.
3
A comparison of costs and hospital length of stay associated with intravenous/oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elderly US patients.美国老年患者中,静脉注射/口服利奈唑胺或静脉注射万古霉素治疗疑似或确诊耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂皮肤和软组织感染的成本及住院时间比较。
Clin Ther. 2007 Mar;29(3):469-77. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80085-3.
4
Influence of real-world characteristics on outcomes for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections: a multi-country medical chart review in Europe.现实特征对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染患者结局的影响:一项在欧洲多国进行的基于病历的回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 2;14:476. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-476.
5
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and skin structure infections.利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和皮肤结构感染的成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Dec;12(6):683-98. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.72.
6
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalised patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in Germany.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗德国住院复杂性皮肤及软组织感染患者的成本效益分析
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Feb;10(1):65-79. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0104-7. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
7
European perspective and update on the management of complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after more than 10 years of experience with linezolid.欧洲视角:利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致复杂性皮肤软组织感染 10 余年的经验更新
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Apr;20 Suppl 4:3-18. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12463.
8
Linezolid reduces length of stay and duration of intravenous treatment compared with vancomycin for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺可缩短因疑似或确诊的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的复杂性皮肤及软组织感染患者的住院时间和静脉治疗时长。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Dec;26(6):442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid vs. vancomycin in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections using a decision analytic model.使用决策分析模型对比利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂皮肤及软组织感染的成本效益分析
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Mar;63(3):376-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01958.x.
10
Clinical efficacy of oral linezolid compared with intravenous vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, case-control analysis.口服利奈唑胺与静脉万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌合并皮肤软组织感染的临床疗效:回顾性、倾向评分匹配、病例对照分析。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1667-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-analysis from real-world REDS study on dalbavancin in inpatient treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.来自真实世界REDS研究的达巴万星治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染住院患者的成本分析。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 9;12:151-157. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2025.3363. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Development of a porcine model of skin and soft-tissue infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains suitable for testing topical antimicrobial agents.建立一种由金黄色葡萄球菌引起的皮肤和软组织感染的猪模型,包括适用于测试局部抗菌剂的耐甲氧西林菌株。
Animal Model Exp Med. 2025 Mar;8(3):544-557. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12495. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Oral minocycline plus rifampicin versus oral linezolid for complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-resistant : The AIDA open label, randomized, controlled Phase 4 trial.
口服米诺环素联合利福平与口服利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染:AIDA开放标签、随机、对照4期试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Dec 26;56:101790. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101790. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Point prevalence study of antibiotic appropriateness and possibility of early discharge from hospital among patients treated with antibiotics in a Swiss University Hospital.瑞士大学医院接受抗生素治疗的患者的抗生素使用适宜性和提前出院可能性的时点患病率研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 May 7;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01104-z.
5
Current and future options for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections: focus on fluoroquinolones and long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics.治疗复杂皮肤和软组织感染的当前和未来选择:重点关注氟喹诺酮类药物和长效糖肽类抗生素。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 22;76(Suppl 4):iv9-iv22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab351.
6
Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of Treatment and Outcomes.坏死性软组织感染:一项关于治疗与结局的单中心回顾性研究
Cureus. 2021 May 15;13(5):e15039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15039.
7
Management of superficial and deep surgical site infection: an international multidisciplinary consensus.浅表和深部手术部位感染的管理:国际多学科共识。
Updates Surg. 2021 Aug;73(4):1315-1325. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01029-z. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Effectiveness, safety and cost analysis of dalbavancin in clinical practice.达巴万星在临床实践中的有效性、安全性和成本分析。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jan;29(1):55-58. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002315. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Successful Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis with Dalbavancin.达巴万星成功治疗糖尿病足骨髓炎。
Med Arch. 2020 Jun;74(3):243-245. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2020.74.243-245.
10
Potential savings through single-dose intravenous Dalbavancin in long-term MRSA infection treatment - a health economic analysis using German DRG data.长期耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染治疗中使用单剂量静脉注射达巴万星的潜在节省——一项使用德国诊断相关分组数据的卫生经济分析
GMS Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 23;7:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/id000043. eCollection 2019.