Eslam Roza Badr, Burian Angela, Vila Greisa, Sauermann Robert, Hammer Alexandra, Frenzel Dorothea, Minichmayr Iris K, Kloft Charlotte, Matzneller Peter, Oesterreicher Zoe, Zeitlinger Markus
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;54(9):1058-62. doi: 10.1002/jcph.296. Epub 2014 May 20.
The underlying pathology of diabetic wounds, i.e. impairment of macro- and microcirculation, might also impact target site penetration of antibacterial drugs. To compare tissue concentrations of linezolid in infected and not infected tissue 10 patients suffering from type 2 diabetes with foot infection were included in the study. Tissue penetration of linezolid was assessed using in vivo microdialysis at the site of infection as well as in non-inflamed subcutaneous adipose tissue. All patients were investigated after receiving a single dose of linezolid and five patients in addition at steady state. After a single dose of linezolid significantly higher area under the concentration vs. time curve over 8 hours (AUC0-8 ) and maximum concentrations (Cmax )-values were observed in plasma (65.5 ± 21.2 mgh/L and 16.4 ± 4.6 mg/L) as compared to inflamed (36.3 ± 22.9 mgh/L and 6.6 ± 3.6 mg/L) and non-inflamed tissue (33.0 ± 17.7 mg*h/L and 6.7 ± 3.6 mg/L). Multiple administrations of linezolid led to disappearance of significant differences in Cmax and AUC0-8 between plasma, inflamed, and non-inflamed tissue. Approximately 2-fold increase of Cmax and AUC0-8 -values in tissue was observed at steady state as compared to the first administration. Penetration of linezolid is not impaired in diabetic foot infection but equilibrium between plasma and tissue might be delayed.
糖尿病伤口的潜在病理机制,即大循环和微循环受损,可能也会影响抗菌药物在靶部位的渗透。为了比较利奈唑胺在感染组织和未感染组织中的浓度,该研究纳入了10例患有足部感染的2型糖尿病患者。使用体内微透析技术评估利奈唑胺在感染部位以及非炎症性皮下脂肪组织中的组织渗透情况。所有患者在接受单剂量利奈唑胺后进行了研究,另外5例患者在稳态时也进行了研究。单剂量利奈唑胺给药后,与感染组织(36.3±22.9mgh/L和6.6±3.6mg/L)和非感染组织(33.0±17.7mgh/L和6.7±3.6mg/L)相比,血浆中观察到8小时浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-8)和最大浓度(Cmax)值显著更高(分别为65.5±21.2mg*h/L和16.4±4.6mg/L)。多次给予利奈唑胺导致血浆、感染组织和非感染组织之间Cmax和AUC0-8的显著差异消失。与首次给药相比,稳态时组织中Cmax和AUC0-8值增加了约2倍。利奈唑胺在糖尿病足部感染中的渗透未受损,但血浆与组织之间的平衡可能会延迟。