Archana R, Kar Sitanshu Sekhar, Premarajan Kc, Lakshminarayanan Subitha
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014 Jan;5(1):135-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.127312.
As a measure to reduce the out of pocket health spending in our country, the high level expert group on Universal Health Coverage recommends a National Health Package free of cost to all. Whether availability of services free of cost, will reduce out of pocket expenditure?
To assess this, we studied the out of pocket health spending among the households of a Ramanathpuram, a village in Puducherry, where surplus health services are available free of cost.
An exploratory study was conducted in by 200 purposively selected households of Ramanathpuram, during the months of March-April 2012.
Information was sought on socio-demographic details (age, gender, and income), expenditure incurred during OPD visits, follow up for chronic diseases, and hospitalization using a pretested questionnaire. Recall periods of 1 and 3 months were considered for OPD visits and hospitalizations, respectively.
Of the total 935 individuals from the 200 households included, 51.3% (480) were men and 455 (48.7%) were women. A total of 231 visits to health care facilities were recorded from 143 (71.5%) households, of which 153 (66.2%) were for acute illness and 68 (29.4%) for follow up of chronic diseases and 10 (4.3%) for hospitalization. The mean per visit expenditure for acute illness, chronic diseases, and hospitalization were INR72.7 ± 143.6, 135.7 ± 196.2, and 1340 ± 1192.9, respectively. Government facilities were availed for 175 (75.7%) visits. Majority of those who incurred health expenditure for acute illness (80.4%) and utilized the private sector for acute illness (78.4%) were from higher socioeconomic class (P = 0.001).
Majority (58.1%) of the households did not incur health care expenditure. Public health care facilities were preferred (75.5%) for seeking care. Availability of services free of cost reduces out of pocket expenditure among non-hospitalized cases.
作为我国减少自付医疗费用的一项措施,全民健康覆盖高级专家组建议为所有人提供免费的国家医疗包。免费提供服务是否会减少自付费用?
为评估这一点,我们研究了普杜切里一个村庄拉马纳特普拉姆家庭的自付医疗费用情况,该村庄有免费的过剩医疗服务。
2012年3月至4月期间,对拉马纳特普拉姆200户有目的选择的家庭进行了一项探索性研究。
使用预先测试的问卷,收集社会人口学细节(年龄、性别和收入)、门诊就诊期间的支出、慢性病随访情况以及住院情况的信息。门诊就诊和住院的回忆期分别为1个月和3个月。
在纳入的200户家庭的935名个体中,51.3%(480人)为男性,455人(48.7%)为女性。共记录了来自143户(71.5%)家庭的231次医疗设施就诊,其中153次(66.2%)是因为急性疾病,68次(29.4%)是慢性病随访,10次(4.3%)是住院。急性疾病、慢性病和住院的每次就诊平均支出分别为72.7印度卢比±143.6、135.7印度卢比±196.2和1340印度卢比±1192.9。175次(75.7%)就诊使用了政府设施。因急性疾病产生医疗费用且在急性疾病方面使用私营部门服务的大多数人(80.4%)来自较高社会经济阶层(P = 0.001)。
大多数(58.1%)家庭没有产生医疗保健支出。寻求医疗服务时更倾向于公共医疗保健设施(75.5%)。免费提供服务可减少非住院病例的自付费用。