Salehzadeh Farhad, Noshin Ahmadvand, Jahangiri Sepideh
Pediatric Department, Bouali Hospital, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (ARUMS), Ardabil 56157, Iran.
Int J Pediatr. 2014;2014:981465. doi: 10.1155/2014/981465. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
Background. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a valuable laboratory tool in evaluation of infectious, inflammatory, and malignant diseases. Red blood cells in outside from the body precipitate due to their higher density than the plasma. In this study we discuss the IVIG effect on ESR in different diseases and different ages. Methods and Materials. Fifty patients under 12 years old who had indication to receive IVIG enrolled in this study. Total dose of IVIG was 2 gr/kg (400 mg/kg in five days or 2 gr/kg in single dose). ESR before infusion of IVIG and within 24 hours after administration of the last dose of IVIG was checked. Results. 23 (46%) patients were males and 27 (54%) were females. The mean of ESR before IVIG was 31.8 ± 29.04 and after IVIG it was 47.2 ± 36.9; this difference was meaningful (P = 0.05). Results of ESR changes in different age groups, 6 patients less than 28 days, 13 patients from 1 month to 1 year, 20 patients from 1 to 6 years old, and 11 patients from 6 to 12 years have been meaningful (P = 0.001, P = 0.025, and P = 0.006, resp.). Conclusion. In patients who are receiving IVIG as a therapy, ESR increased falsely (noninflammatory rising); therefore use of ESR for monitoring of response to treatment may be unreliable. Although these results do not apply to neonatal group, we suggest that, in patients who received IVIG, interpretation of ESR should be used cautiously on followup.
背景。红细胞沉降率(ESR)是评估感染性、炎症性和恶性疾病的一项重要实验室指标。体外的红细胞因其密度高于血浆而发生沉淀。在本研究中,我们探讨了静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)对不同疾病和不同年龄段患者ESR的影响。
方法与材料。本研究纳入了50例有指征接受IVIG治疗的12岁以下患者。IVIG的总剂量为2克/千克(分五天,每天400毫克/千克,或单剂量2克/千克)。分别检测IVIG输注前及最后一剂IVIG给药后24小时内的ESR。
结果。23例(46%)患者为男性,27例(54%)为女性。IVIG治疗前ESR的平均值为31.8±29.04,治疗后为47.2±36.9;这一差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。不同年龄组ESR变化的结果显示,6例年龄小于28天的患者、13例1个月至1岁的患者、20例1至6岁的患者以及11例6至12岁的患者,差异均具有统计学意义(分别为P = 0.001、P = 0.025和P = 0.006)。
结论。接受IVIG治疗的患者,ESR会出现假性升高(非炎症性升高);因此,使用ESR来监测治疗反应可能并不可靠。尽管这些结果不适用于新生儿组,但我们建议,对于接受过IVIG治疗的患者,随访时应谨慎解读ESR结果。