Suppr超能文献

六台 CBCT 设备中体素值分布的变化和曝光时间间隔的影响。

Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units.

机构信息

Section of Oral Radiology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(4):20130376. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130376. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the variation in voxel value distribution in volumetric data sets obtained by six cone beam CT (CBCT) units, and the effect of time between exposures. Six CBCT units [Cranex(®) 3D (CRAN; Soredex Oy, Tuusula, Finland), Scanora(®) 3D (SCAN; Soredex Oy), NewTom™ 5G (NEWT; QR Srl, Verona, Italy), Promax(®) Dimax 3 (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland), i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) and 3D Accuitomo FPD80 (Morita, Kyoto, Japan)] were tested. Two volumetric data sets of a dry human skull embedded in acrylic were acquired by each CBCT unit in two sessions on separate days. Each session consisted of 20 exposures: 10 acquired with 30 min between exposures and 10 acquired immediately one after the other. CBCT data were exported as digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) files and converted to text files. The text files were re-organized to contain x-, y- and z-position and grey shade for each voxel. The files were merged to contain 1 record per voxel position, including the voxel values from the 20 exposures in a session. For each voxel, subtractions were performed between Data Set 1 and the remaining 19 data sets (1 - 2, 1 - 3, etc) in a session. Means, medians, ranges and standard deviations for grey shade variation in the subtraction data sets were calculated for each unit and session. For all CBCT units, variation in voxel values was observed throughout the 20 exposures. A "fingerprint" for the grey shade variation was observed for CRAN, SCAN and NEWT. For the other units, the variation was (apparently) randomly distributed. Large discrepancies in voxel value distribution are seen in CBCT images. This variation should be considered in studies that assess minute changes in CBCT images.

摘要

本研究旨在评估六台锥形束 CT(CBCT)设备获得的容积数据集的体素值分布变化,以及两次曝光之间的时间影响。六台 CBCT 设备[Cranex(®)3D(CRAN;Soredex Oy,图苏拉,芬兰),Scanora(®)3D(SCAN;Soredex Oy),NewTom(TM)5G(NEWT;QR Srl,维罗纳,意大利),Promax(®)Dimax 3(Planmeca Oy,赫尔辛基,芬兰),i-CAT(Imaging Sciences International,哈特菲尔德,宾夕法尼亚州)和 3D Accuitomo FPD80(森田,京都,日本)]进行了测试。每个 CBCT 设备在两天的两个不同时间段分别对一个嵌入丙烯酸的干燥人颅骨进行了两次容积数据采集。每个时间段包括 20 次曝光:10 次曝光之间间隔 30 分钟,10 次曝光连续进行。CBCT 数据以数字成像和通信在医学(DICOM)文件中导出,并转换为文本文件。文本文件重新组织为包含每个体素的 x、y 和 z 位置和灰度阴影。这些文件合并为一个记录包含每个体素位置,包括一个时间段内 20 次曝光的体素值。对于每个体素,在一个时间段内,在数据集 1 和其余 19 个数据集(1-2、1-3 等)之间进行减法运算。对于每个单位和时间段,计算减法数据集中灰度阴影变化的平均值、中位数、范围和标准差。对于所有 CBCT 设备,在 20 次曝光过程中观察到体素值的变化。CRAN、SCAN 和 NEWT 观察到灰度阴影变化的“指纹”。对于其他设备,变化(显然)是随机分布的。在 CBCT 图像中看到体素值分布的大差异。在评估 CBCT 图像中的微小变化的研究中,应该考虑这种变化。

相似文献

1
Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(4):20130376. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130376. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
2
Standardized method to quantify the variation in voxel value distribution in patient-simulated CBCT data sets.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(2):20140283. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140283. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
3
Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):972-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(3):79884780. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/79884780. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Investigation of dental cone-beam CT pixel data and a modified method for conversion to Hounsfield unit (HU).
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Feb;47(2):20170321. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170321. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
J Endod. 2017 Sep;43(9):1517-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.035. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
8
Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):32310645. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/32310645. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
9
Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(8):649-55. doi: 10.1259/dmf/81804525.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of frozen soft tissues to simulate fresh soft tissue conditions in cone beam CT scans.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Mar 25;53(3):196-202. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae004.
3
Effect of the Field of View Size on CBCT Artifacts Caused by the Presence of Metal Objects in the Exomass.
Int J Dent. 2022 Sep 9;2022:2071108. doi: 10.1155/2022/2071108. eCollection 2022.
4
Novel Anterior Cranial Base Area for Voxel-Based Superimposition of Craniofacial CBCTs.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3536. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123536.
6
Influence of the exomass on the detection of simulated root fracture in cone-beam CT - an study.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 May 1;50(4):20200450. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200450. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?
Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Mar;50(1):23-30. doi: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.23. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass?
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180290. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180290. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Evaluation of soft tissues simulant materials in cone beam computed tomography.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Jan;48(1):20180072. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180072. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jul;116(1):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.04.013.
2
Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(5):20120245. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120245. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Aug;16(4):471-8. doi: 10.1111/cid.12027. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
4
Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.
Br J Radiol. 2013 Jan;86(1021):20120135. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120135.
6
The accuracy of CBCT in measuring jaws bone density.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Oct;16(10):1425-9.
7
Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):32310645. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/32310645. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
8
The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):862-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02373.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
9
Artefacts in CBCT: a review.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Jul;40(5):265-73. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039.
10
Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验