Suppr超能文献

六台 CBCT 设备中体素值分布的变化和曝光时间间隔的影响。

Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units.

机构信息

Section of Oral Radiology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(4):20130376. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130376. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the variation in voxel value distribution in volumetric data sets obtained by six cone beam CT (CBCT) units, and the effect of time between exposures. Six CBCT units [Cranex(®) 3D (CRAN; Soredex Oy, Tuusula, Finland), Scanora(®) 3D (SCAN; Soredex Oy), NewTom™ 5G (NEWT; QR Srl, Verona, Italy), Promax(®) Dimax 3 (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland), i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) and 3D Accuitomo FPD80 (Morita, Kyoto, Japan)] were tested. Two volumetric data sets of a dry human skull embedded in acrylic were acquired by each CBCT unit in two sessions on separate days. Each session consisted of 20 exposures: 10 acquired with 30 min between exposures and 10 acquired immediately one after the other. CBCT data were exported as digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) files and converted to text files. The text files were re-organized to contain x-, y- and z-position and grey shade for each voxel. The files were merged to contain 1 record per voxel position, including the voxel values from the 20 exposures in a session. For each voxel, subtractions were performed between Data Set 1 and the remaining 19 data sets (1 - 2, 1 - 3, etc) in a session. Means, medians, ranges and standard deviations for grey shade variation in the subtraction data sets were calculated for each unit and session. For all CBCT units, variation in voxel values was observed throughout the 20 exposures. A "fingerprint" for the grey shade variation was observed for CRAN, SCAN and NEWT. For the other units, the variation was (apparently) randomly distributed. Large discrepancies in voxel value distribution are seen in CBCT images. This variation should be considered in studies that assess minute changes in CBCT images.

摘要

本研究旨在评估六台锥形束 CT(CBCT)设备获得的容积数据集的体素值分布变化,以及两次曝光之间的时间影响。六台 CBCT 设备[Cranex(®)3D(CRAN;Soredex Oy,图苏拉,芬兰),Scanora(®)3D(SCAN;Soredex Oy),NewTom(TM)5G(NEWT;QR Srl,维罗纳,意大利),Promax(®)Dimax 3(Planmeca Oy,赫尔辛基,芬兰),i-CAT(Imaging Sciences International,哈特菲尔德,宾夕法尼亚州)和 3D Accuitomo FPD80(森田,京都,日本)]进行了测试。每个 CBCT 设备在两天的两个不同时间段分别对一个嵌入丙烯酸的干燥人颅骨进行了两次容积数据采集。每个时间段包括 20 次曝光:10 次曝光之间间隔 30 分钟,10 次曝光连续进行。CBCT 数据以数字成像和通信在医学(DICOM)文件中导出,并转换为文本文件。文本文件重新组织为包含每个体素的 x、y 和 z 位置和灰度阴影。这些文件合并为一个记录包含每个体素位置,包括一个时间段内 20 次曝光的体素值。对于每个体素,在一个时间段内,在数据集 1 和其余 19 个数据集(1-2、1-3 等)之间进行减法运算。对于每个单位和时间段,计算减法数据集中灰度阴影变化的平均值、中位数、范围和标准差。对于所有 CBCT 设备,在 20 次曝光过程中观察到体素值的变化。CRAN、SCAN 和 NEWT 观察到灰度阴影变化的“指纹”。对于其他设备,变化(显然)是随机分布的。在 CBCT 图像中看到体素值分布的大差异。在评估 CBCT 图像中的微小变化的研究中,应该考虑这种变化。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10

本文引用的文献

8
The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.周围条件对锥形束计算机断层扫描像素值的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):862-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02373.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
9
Artefacts in CBCT: a review.CBCT 中的伪影:综述。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Jul;40(5):265-73. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039.
10
Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.多层和锥形束 CT 强度变化分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验