Suppr超能文献

分离性障碍和边缘型人格障碍中的分离性遗忘:大学生群体的自评评估

Dissociative amnesia in dissociative disorders and borderline personality disorder: self-rating assessment in a college population.

作者信息

Sar Vedat, Alioğlu Firdevs, Akyuz Gamze, Karabulut Sercan

机构信息

a Clinical Psychotherapy Unit and Dissociative Disorders Program and Department of Psychiatry , University of Istanbul , Istanbul , Turkey.

出版信息

J Trauma Dissociation. 2014;15(4):477-93. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2014.902415.

Abstract

Dissociative amnesia (DA) among subjects with a dissociative disorder and/or borderline personality disorder (BPD) recruited from a nonclinical population was examined. The Steinberg Dissociative Amnesia Questionnaire (SDAQ), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, and the self-report screening tool of the BPD section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV(SCID-BPD) were administered to 1,301 college students. A total of 80 participants who were diagnosed with BPD according to the clinician-administered SCID-BPD and 111 nonborderline controls were evaluated using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D) by a psychiatrist blind to diagnosis and scale scores. Internal consistency analyses and test-retest evaluations suggested that the SDAQ is a reliable instrument for the population studied. Of the participants, 20.6% reported an SDAQ score of 20 or above and impairment by DA. Those who had both dissociative disorder and BPD (n = 78) had the highest SDAQ scores. Both disorders had significant effects on the SCID-D total and amnesia scores in the variance analysis. On SDAQ scores, however, only BPD had this effect. There was a significant interaction between the 2 disorders for the SCID-D total but not for the SDAQ or SCID-D amnesia scores. BPD represented the severity of dissociation and childhood trauma in this study group. However, in contrast to the dissociative disorders, BPD was characterized by better awareness of DA in self-report. The discrepancies between self-report and clinical interview associated with BPD and dissociative disorders are discussed in the context of betrayal theory (J. J. Freyd, 1994) of BPD and perceptual theory (D. B. Beere, 2009) of dissociative disorders.

摘要

对从非临床人群中招募的患有分离性障碍和/或边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的受试者的分离性遗忘症(DA)进行了研究。对1301名大学生施测了斯坦伯格分离性遗忘症问卷(SDAQ)、儿童创伤问卷以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈(SCID)中BPD部分的自我报告筛查工具。根据临床医生施测的SCID - BPD,共有80名被诊断为BPD的参与者和111名非边缘性对照者,由一名对诊断和量表分数不知情的精神科医生使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版分离性障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID - D)进行评估。内部一致性分析和重测评估表明,SDAQ是适用于所研究人群的可靠工具。在参与者中,20.6%报告SDAQ得分在20分及以上且存在DA损伤。同时患有分离性障碍和BPD的参与者(n = 78)的SDAQ得分最高。在方差分析中,这两种障碍对SCID - D总分和遗忘症得分均有显著影响。然而,在SDAQ得分方面,只有BPD有此影响。两种障碍在SCID - D总分上存在显著交互作用,但在SDAQ或SCID - D遗忘症得分上不存在。在该研究组中,BPD代表了分离的严重程度和童年创伤。然而,与分离性障碍不同的是,BPD在自我报告中对DA的认知更好。在BPD的背叛理论(J. J. Freyd,1994)和分离性障碍的知觉理论(D. B. Beere,2009)的背景下,讨论了与BPD和分离性障碍相关的自我报告与临床访谈之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验