• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用EFA和FIM评定量表可以对获得性脑损伤患者进行更全面的评估。

Using EFA and FIM rating scales could provide a more complete assessment of patients with acquired brain injury.

作者信息

Stubbs Peter W, Pallesen Hanne, Pedersen Asger R, Nielsen Jørgen F

机构信息

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus University , Hammel , Denmark.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(26):2278-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.904935. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

DOI:10.3109/09638288.2014.904935
PMID:24678931
Abstract

PURPOSE

In some hospitals, patients exhibit significant heterogeneity of function at admission and discharge. The current study aims to assess if concurrent usage of the Early Functional Assessment (EFA) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is warranted and practical in rehabilitation centers with diverse patient groups and outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined a data set of all patients with concurrent EFA and FIM scores admitted to a single rehabilitation center (4076 scores from 1251 patients). The patients had acquired brain injury of multiple etiologies and a range of severities.

RESULTS

The EFA scale was more able to characterize the function of lower functioning patients according to the FIM while the FIM scale was more able to characterize the function of higher functioning patients according to the EFA. This was highlighted by 21% of assessments with the lowest FIM score (18) having corresponding EFA scores of 22-76 and 27% of assessments with the highest EFA score (>90) having corresponding FIM scores of 38-126.

CONCLUSIONS

In rehabilitation centers with diverse patient groups and outcomes, the FIM and EFA scale could be used to characterize the heterogeneity of function in patients with acquired brain injury. The EFA/FIM scale could be used concurrently in certain patients providing a more complete view of patients throughout the rehabilitation process.

摘要

目的

在一些医院,患者入院和出院时功能存在显著异质性。本研究旨在评估在患者群体和治疗结果各异的康复中心,同时使用早期功能评估(EFA)和功能独立性测量(FIM)是否合理且可行。

方法

这项回顾性研究检查了一家康复中心所有同时有EFA和FIM评分的患者数据集(来自1251名患者的4076个评分)。这些患者有多种病因导致的获得性脑损伤,严重程度各异。

结果

根据FIM,EFA量表更能描述功能较低患者的功能,而根据EFA,FIM量表更能描述功能较高患者的功能。这一点在以下情况中得到凸显:21%的FIM评分最低(18分)的评估对应的EFA评分为22 - 76分,27%的EFA评分最高(>90分)的评估对应的FIM评分为38 - 126分。

结论

在患者群体和治疗结果各异的康复中心,FIM和EFA量表可用于描述获得性脑损伤患者功能的异质性。EFA/FIM量表可同时用于某些患者,以便在整个康复过程中更全面地了解患者情况。

相似文献

1
Using EFA and FIM rating scales could provide a more complete assessment of patients with acquired brain injury.使用EFA和FIM评定量表可以对获得性脑损伤患者进行更全面的评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(26):2278-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.904935. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
2
Reducing redundant testing using the Functional Independence Measure and Early Functional Abilities scale during rehabilitation in patients with brain injury.在脑损伤患者康复期间,使用功能独立性测量和早期功能能力量表减少重复测试。
Brain Inj. 2018;32(9):1090-1095. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1482425. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的损伤严重程度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分与康复潜力的关系。
Am Surg. 2003 Jun;69(6):491-7; discussion 497-8.
4
The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.FIM+FAM在评估创伤性脑损伤日间项目结果中的效用。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):267-77. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000290971.56130.c8.
5
Time to rehabilitation admission and associated outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的康复入院时间及相关结局
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Dec;87(12):1590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.001.
6
A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay.对老年创伤性脑损伤患者的随访研究:考虑住院时间的缩短
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.309.
7
Association between the sensory-motor nervous system and the autonomic nervous system in neurorehabilitation patients with severe acquired brain injury.重度获得性脑损伤神经康复患者感觉运动神经系统与自主神经系统之间的关联
Brain Inj. 2015;29(3):374-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.969312. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
Functional level during sub-acute rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: course and predictors of outcome.创伤性脑损伤后亚急性康复期间的功能水平:病程及预后预测因素
Brain Inj. 2010;24(5):740-7. doi: 10.3109/02699051003652849.
9
Analysis of intensive outpatient neuro-rehabilitation outcomes using FIM+FAM(UK).使用 FIM+FAM(UK) 分析强化门诊神经康复的结果。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(4):377-82. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0492.
10
Berg balance scale and outcome measures in acquired brain injury.伯格平衡量表与获得性脑损伤的结局指标
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;15(3):239-44. doi: 10.1177/154596830101500312.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability and Factors Associated with Disability in the Discharge Transition Phase After Acquired Brain Injury: An Observational Follow-Up Study.后天性脑损伤后出院过渡阶段的残疾及与残疾相关的因素:一项观察性随访研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):1989. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161989.
2
Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data.中度至重度获得性脑损伤后综合急性后期住院康复的康复结局——基于常规收集的健康数据进行总体预后研究的研究方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2025 Jan 7;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00183-3.
3
Survival and predictive factors of clinical outcome in patients with severe acquired brain injury.
严重获得性脑损伤患者的临床结局的生存和预测因素。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;60(4):597-603. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08430-2. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
Factors Associated With Time to Decannulation in Patients With Tracheostomy Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.与严重创伤性脑损伤后行气管切开术患者拔管时间相关的因素。
Respir Care. 2024 Apr 22;69(5):566-574. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11376.
5
Exploring Physical Activity During the Discharge Transition Phase in People With Acquired Brain Injury-An Observational Study.探究获得性脑损伤患者出院过渡阶段的身体活动——一项观察性研究
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Nov 17;5(1):100247. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100247. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
The Early Functional Abilities-revised may bridge the gap between the disorder of consciousness and the functional independence scales: evidence from Rasch analysis.早期功能能力修订版可能弥合意识障碍和功能独立性量表之间的差距:来自Rasch 分析的证据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):805-817. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07522-0. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Validity of the Early Functional Ability scale (EFA) among critically ill patients undergoing early neurological rehabilitation.早期功能能力量表(EFA)在接受早期神经康复的危重症患者中的有效性。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Sep 6;22(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02855-3.
8
Cohort profile: Design and implementation of the Danish Physiotherapy Research Database for patients receiving primary care with chronic disease.队列资料简介:丹麦针对接受慢性病初级保健患者的物理治疗研究数据库的设计和实施。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e040207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040207.
9
The effect of intensified nonverbal facilitation of swallowing on dysphagia after severe acquired brain injury: A randomised controlled pilot study.强化非言语吞咽促进对严重后天性脑损伤后吞咽困难的影响:一项随机对照初步研究。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2019 Dec 18;45(4):525-536. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192901.
10
Early mobilisation by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury - Protocol for a randomised clinical feasibility trial.重度创伤性脑损伤后采用头高位倾斜并配合踏步进行早期活动与标准护理的比较——一项随机临床可行性试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 8;19(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3004-x.