• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般韩国人群中 TTO、VAS 和 EQ-5D 测量的部分性癫痫效用评分。

The utility score of epilepsy with partial seizure measured by TTO, VAS, and EQ-5D in the general Korean population.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 440-746, South Korea.

Department of Health Administration and Management 1619, Soon Chun Hyang University, 646 Eupnae-ri, Shinchang-myeon, Asan City, Chungnam, 336-745, South Korea.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2014 Jul;108(5):963-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.02.014
PMID:24679945
Abstract

PURPOSES

This study aimed to measure utilities, which are quantitative terms incorporating preferences, for various health states of epilepsy with partial seizure in the general population in South Korea. It also aimed to find socio-demographic characteristics associated with the utility scores.

METHODS

Utility scores using Time Trade-Off (TTO), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and EuroQol five Dimension (EQ-5D) were obtained from 300 people aged 16 and over by face-to-face interviews. We measured utilities for three hypothetical health states of epilepsy for which scenarios were defined based on the frequency of partial seizure: seizure-free, seizure reduction, and withdrawal. We compared utilities with varying seizure frequency using a repeated-measures ANOVA, and analyzed the association between utilities and socio-demographic characteristics using a generalized estimating equation (GEE).

RESULTS

The mean utility scores for withdrawal state, seizure reduction state, and seizure-free state were 0.303, 0.493, and 0.899, respectively, when measured by TTO. VAS yielded the mean utility scores of 0.211, 0.424, and 0.752 for respective health states, and corresponding scores with EQ-5D were 0.261, 0.645, and 0.959. The utility scores for the three health states were statistically different in TTO, VAS, and EQ-5D. The withdrawal state had the lowest utility scores. There were differences in mean utilities for the three health states across the three methods. Utilities by EQ-5D tended to have higher values than those by TTO and VAS. Utilities by VAS had the lowest values. In GEE analysis, the severity of epilepsy and household income were significantly related to utility scores.

CONCLUSION

The withdrawal state of epilepsy had the lowest utility value and the seizure-free state had the highest by all three techniques of utility measurement used. There were significant differences in utilities between one severity level of epilepsy and another. Utility was associated with household income and the severity of disease. Utility scores for distinct epilepsy states obtained in this study could facilitate health economic analyses of epilepsy treatments and thus help decision making in resource allocation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在衡量韩国普通人群中部分性癫痫发作的各种健康状态的效用,这些效用是包含偏好的定量术语。本研究还旨在发现与效用评分相关的社会人口统计学特征。

方法

通过面对面访谈,从 300 名 16 岁及以上的人群中获得了使用时间权衡(TTO)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 EuroQol 五维量表(EQ-5D)的效用评分。我们根据部分性癫痫发作的频率定义了三种假设的癫痫健康状态的场景,并对这些场景进行了测量:无癫痫发作、癫痫发作减少和停药。我们使用重复测量方差分析比较了不同癫痫发作频率的效用,并使用广义估计方程(GEE)分析了效用与社会人口统计学特征之间的关系。

结果

当使用 TTO 测量时,停药状态、癫痫发作减少状态和无癫痫发作状态的平均效用评分分别为 0.303、0.493 和 0.899。VAS 分别产生了 0.211、0.424 和 0.752 的健康状态平均效用评分,而 EQ-5D 的相应评分分别为 0.261、0.645 和 0.959。在 TTO、VAS 和 EQ-5D 中,三种健康状态的效用评分存在统计学差异。停药状态的效用评分最低。在三种方法中,三种健康状态的平均效用评分存在差异。EQ-5D 的效用评分倾向于高于 TTO 和 VAS。VAS 的效用评分最低。在 GEE 分析中,癫痫的严重程度和家庭收入与效用评分显著相关。

结论

在所有三种效用测量技术中,癫痫停药状态的效用值最低,无癫痫发作状态的效用值最高。不同严重程度的癫痫之间的效用存在显著差异。效用与家庭收入和疾病严重程度有关。本研究中获得的不同癫痫状态的效用评分可以促进癫痫治疗的健康经济分析,从而有助于资源分配的决策。

相似文献

1
The utility score of epilepsy with partial seizure measured by TTO, VAS, and EQ-5D in the general Korean population.一般韩国人群中 TTO、VAS 和 EQ-5D 测量的部分性癫痫效用评分。
Epilepsy Res. 2014 Jul;108(5):963-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
2
Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者健康状态效用测量的比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;141(8):696-703. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1314.
3
Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.比较三种欧洲国家用 EQ-5D 衡量的人口健康状况的不同评估方法。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):750-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00509.x.
4
Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.评估类风湿关节炎中的效用值:时间权衡法与欧洲五维度健康量表的比较
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):751-6. doi: 10.1002/art.22226.
5
Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states.EQ-5D健康状态的时间权衡法(TTO)和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)值的不一致性。
Med Decis Making. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):173-81. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06286480.
6
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
7
Pain quality of life as measured by utilities.根据效用衡量的疼痛生活质量。
Pain Med. 2014 May;15(5):865-70. doi: 10.1111/pme.12405. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
8
QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.糖尿病视网膜病变的 QALY 权重——HUI-3、EQ-5D、EQ-VAS 和 TTO 健康状态评估的比较。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.031. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
EQ-5D-based utilities and healthcare utilization in Thai adults with chronic epilepsy.基于EQ-5D量表的泰国成年慢性癫痫患者的效用值及医疗服务利用情况
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jun;83:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Assessment of health state utilities and quality of life in patients with malignant esophageal Dysphagia.恶性食管吞咽困难患者健康状态效用和生活质量的评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1044-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30166.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review of single-item global rating scales utilized in epilepsy research: Patterns of use, challenges, and recommendations.癫痫研究中使用的单项整体评定量表的范围综述:使用模式、挑战及建议
Epilepsia. 2025 Jun;66(6):1757-1772. doi: 10.1111/epi.18333. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
2
A standard gamble study to determine health state utilities associated with seizures in glioma in the UK.一项在英国开展的标准博弈研究,旨在确定与胶质瘤癫痫发作相关的健康状态效用值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02348-0.
3
Health utilities of patients with epilepsy in a Canadian population.
加拿大人群中癫痫患者的健康效用值
Epilepsia. 2024 Dec;65(12):3526-3535. doi: 10.1111/epi.18132. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Comparative safety analysis of lacosamide and perampanel in epilepsy management: insights from FAERS database.拉科酰胺与吡仑帕奈在癫痫治疗中的安全性比较分析:来自FAERS数据库的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 19;15:1418609. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1418609. eCollection 2024.
5
Immunosuppressant drugs and quality-of-life outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: An international cohort study (EU-TRAIN).肾移植受者的免疫抑制药物与生活质量结局:一项国际队列研究(欧盟-TRAIN)
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1040584. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1040584. eCollection 2023.
6
Preferences and Utilities for Health States after Treatment of Olfactory Groove Meningioma: Endoscopic versus Open.嗅沟脑膜瘤治疗后健康状态的偏好与效用:内镜手术与开放手术对比
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017 Aug;78(4):315-323. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598197. Epub 2017 Feb 17.