Center for Medical Technology Assessment, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.031. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
To estimate quality-adjusted life-year weights for patients with diabetic retinopathy by using various methods and to investigate the empirical validity of the different measures.
The study population comprised 152 patients with diabetes in Östergötland County, Sweden. Participants were interviewed by telephone by using the time trade-off (TTO) method and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) (direct valuations) as well as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the health utilities index mark 3 (HUI-3) (indirect valuations). The quality-adjusted life-year weights were adjusted for potential confounders by using analysis of covariance. The empirical validity of the measures was examined by testing their ability to detect hypothetical differences between severity levels of diabetic retinopathy and by investigating the correlation between the measures and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25).
All measures detected significant differences in scores between patient groups classified according to visual impairment in the better eye (analysis of covariance, P < 0.05), but only HUI-3 and EQ-VAS detected significant differences between patient groups classified according to visual impairment or pathological progression in the worse eye. HUI-3 recorded a difference of 0.43 in values between normal vision and blindness in the better eye, which was more than twice the differences captured by the other measures (0.15-0.20). In addition, HUI-3 showed the highest correlation with NEI VFQ-25 (r = 0.54; P < 0.001).
In cost-utility analyses, the choice of quality-adjusted life-year measure may affect whether an intervention is considered cost-effective. Furthermore, if decisions are to be based on values from the general public, HUI-3 can be recommended for cost-utility analyses of interventions directed at diabetic retinopathy.
通过使用各种方法来估计患有糖尿病视网膜病变患者的质量调整生命年权重,并探讨不同措施的经验有效性。
本研究对象为瑞典厄斯特哥特兰省的 152 名糖尿病患者。通过电话访谈,使用时间权衡(TTO)法和视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)(直接赋值)以及欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和健康效用指数标记 3(HUI-3)(间接赋值)来评估患者。通过协方差分析,对质量调整生命年权重进行了潜在混杂因素的调整。通过测试这些措施检测糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度差异的能力以及调查这些措施与 25 项国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)之间的相关性来检验这些措施的经验有效性。
所有措施均检测到根据较好眼视力损害程度分类的患者组之间的评分存在显著差异(协方差分析,P < 0.05),但只有 HUI-3 和 EQ-VAS 检测到根据较差眼视力损害或病理性进展程度分类的患者组之间存在显著差异。HUI-3 在较好眼中,正常视力和失明之间的分值差异为 0.43,是其他措施(0.15-0.20)捕捉到的差异的两倍多。此外,HUI-3 与 NEI VFQ-25 的相关性最高(r = 0.54;P < 0.001)。
在成本效用分析中,质量调整生命年衡量标准的选择可能会影响干预措施是否被认为具有成本效益。此外,如果要基于公众的价值观做出决策,那么 HUI-3 可用于针对糖尿病视网膜病变的干预措施的成本效用分析。