• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复的结果。

Outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle tears of medial meniscus.

机构信息

Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):492-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.020
PMID:24680309
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle medial meniscal tears by use of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical examination, and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with chronic bucket-handle medial meniscal tears that had been repaired with meniscal sutures was undertaken. The following criteria for inclusion were adopted: minimum tear length of 2 cm and chronic medial meniscal tear identified at the time of arthroscopy. The tears were susceptible to dislocation with probing. Data collected included demographic, clinical, radiologic, and surgical data. Postoperative healing was assessed with the clinical criteria of Barrett et al. The International Knee Documentation Committee rating, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity level were determined, and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate healing in accordance with the criteria of Henning et al.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean time from injury to surgery was 10 months (range, 2 to 60 months). Sixteen patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 1 patient underwent posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and 6 patients underwent meniscus repair only. A median of 5 sutures (range, 3 to 6 sutures) were used for repair. Four cases (all of which had undergone meniscus repair only) required revision. Complete healing was achieved in 83% of cases according to the criteria of Barrett et al. The mean follow-up time was 48 months (range, 24 to 112 months). An International Knee Documentation Committee rating of A or B was achieved in the 20 patients who did not require revision. The median Lysholm score was 95 (range, 92 to 100). The median Tegner activity level before injury was 7, and it remained unchanged after surgery in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that repair of chronic bucket-handle meniscal tears can lead to good clinical outcomes and a relatively low (17%) failure rate. In addition, repairs of isolated meniscal tears had a significantly higher risk of failure than repairs performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过磁共振成像(MRI)、临床检查和患者报告的结果来确定慢性桶柄状内侧半月板撕裂修复后的结果。

方法

对接受半月板缝合修复的慢性桶柄状内侧半月板撕裂患者进行回顾性研究。纳入标准为:至少 2cm 的撕裂长度和关节镜检查时发现的慢性内侧半月板撕裂。探查时撕裂容易脱位。收集的数据包括人口统计学、临床、影像学和手术数据。术后愈合采用 Barrett 等的临床标准进行评估。采用国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee,IKDC)评分、Lysholm 评分和 Tegner 活动水平进行评估,并根据 Henning 等的标准进行术后 MRI 评估愈合情况。

结果

24 例患者符合纳入标准。从损伤到手术的平均时间为 10 个月(范围,2 至 60 个月)。16 例患者接受了前交叉韧带重建,1 例患者接受了后交叉韧带重建,6 例患者仅接受了半月板修复。中位数为 5 根缝线(范围,3 至 6 根缝线)用于修复。4 例(均仅行半月板修复)需要翻修。根据 Barrett 等的标准,83%的病例达到完全愈合。平均随访时间为 48 个月(范围,24 至 112 个月)。20 例未行翻修的患者获得 IKDC 评分 A 或 B。Lysholm 评分为 95(范围,92 至 100)。中位数术前 Tegner 活动水平为 7,所有患者术后保持不变。

结论

本研究表明,慢性桶柄状半月板撕裂的修复可带来良好的临床结果和相对较低(17%)的失败率。此外,孤立性半月板撕裂的修复失败风险明显高于与前交叉韧带重建联合进行的修复。

证据等级

IV 级,治疗性病例系列。

相似文献

1
Outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle tears of medial meniscus.慢性内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复的结果。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):492-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.020.
2
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.径向与桶柄状半月板撕裂修复的对比结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.在至少2年的随访中,桶柄状半月板修复和垂直半月板修复可获得相似的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3104-3110. doi: 10.1177/0363546517719244. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
Long-term follow-up of bucket-handle meniscal repairs: chondroprotective effect outweighs high failure risk.桶柄状半月板修复的长期随访:软骨保护作用大于高失败风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2209-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06787-2. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
5
Surgical Repair of Neglected Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears Displaced into the Intercondylar Notch: Clinical and Radiological Results.手术修复移位至髁间切迹的陈旧性半月板桶柄状撕裂:临床及影像学结果
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):514-519. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604146. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
6
What are the factors to affect outcome and healing of meniscus bucket handle tears?影响半月板桶柄状撕裂预后和愈合的因素有哪些?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1365-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2989-7. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
7
Comparison of Cases with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Accompanied by Simultaneous Medial Meniscus Bucket Handle Tear Repair and Isolated Medial Meniscus Bucket Handle Tear Repair.前交叉韧带重建伴同期内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修补与单纯内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修补的病例比较。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Sep;35(11):1242-1248. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722624. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Arthroscopic meniscal repair with use of the outside-in technique.采用由外向内技术进行关节镜下半月板修复。
Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:195-206.
9
Results of arthroscopic repair of partial- or full-thickness longitudinal medial meniscal tears by single or double vertical sutures using the inside-out technique.关节镜下采用经皮内外侧入路双垂直缝合或单垂直缝合修复部分或全层纵向内侧半月板撕裂的疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):596-602. doi: 10.1177/0363546512472046. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
10
Outcomes after meniscal repair using the meniscus arrow in knees undergoing concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.在同时进行前交叉韧带重建的膝关节中使用半月板箭进行半月板修复后的结果。
Arthroscopy. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(6):569-77. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.29897.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Subsequent Surgery After Repair in Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears and Meniscectomy Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study.桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术后二次手术与半月板切除术的比较:一项大型纳入队列研究的分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 5;12(9):23259671241270355. doi: 10.1177/23259671241270355. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction.在进行前交叉韧带重建时,与部分半月板切除术相比,桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术能改善患者预后。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Aug 28;11(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears Might Not Be an Urgency: The Time to Meniscus Repair Does Not Seem to Affect the Mid-Term Outcome-A Retrospective Study of Sixty Tears with a Mean Follow-Up of 6 Years.
桶柄状半月板撕裂可能并非紧急情况:半月板修复时机似乎不影响中期结果——一项对60例撕裂病例的回顾性研究,平均随访6年
J Clin Med. 2024 May 22;13(11):3048. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113048.
4
Rates of subsequent surgeries after meniscus repair with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.半月板修复术后伴或不伴前交叉韧带重建的后续手术率。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294964. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of Biologic Augmentation on Revision Surgery Rates After Meniscus Repair: A Matched-Cohort Analysis of 3420 Patients.生物增强对半月板修复术后翻修手术率的影响:3420例患者的配对队列分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 25;11(8):23259671231186990. doi: 10.1177/23259671231186990. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Clinical and MRI Outcomes of Repaired Peripheral Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus With ACL Reconstruction: Results According to Tear Size.前交叉韧带重建修复内侧半月板后角周围纵向撕裂的临床和MRI结果:根据撕裂大小的结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 25;11(8):23259671231167535. doi: 10.1177/23259671231167535. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Greater rate of return to play and re-injury following all-inside meniscal repair compared to the inside-out technique: a systematic review.全内视镜半月板修复术相较于经内-外通道半月板修复术,具有更高的重返赛场和再损伤率:一项系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6273-6282. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04933-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Inferior Healing Rate in Isolated Meniscal Repair than that in Meniscal Repair with Concomitant ACL Reconstruction Evaluated with MRI.通过MRI评估发现,单纯半月板修复的愈合率低于半月板修复同时进行前交叉韧带重建的愈合率。
Malays Orthop J. 2023 Mar;17(1):61-69. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2303.008.
9
Long-term clinical results of using a posteromedial all-inside and anteromedial inside-out approach to repair unstable or irreducible bucket-handle medial meniscal tears.使用后内侧经皮入路(posteromedial all-inside)与前内侧经皮入路(anteromedial inside-out)联合入路治疗不稳定或不可复位的桶柄状内侧半月板撕裂的长期临床疗效。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Apr 6;24(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00691-w.
10
The Modified PROMT Score: A Better Prognosticative Tool to Assess Traumatic Meniscal Tear Reparability.改良PROMT评分:评估创伤性半月板撕裂可修复性的更好的预后工具。
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Feb 9;57(3):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00838-1. eCollection 2023 Mar.