Nennecke Alice, Geiss Karla, Hentschel Stefan, Vettorazzi Eik, Jansen Lina, Eberle Andrea, Holleczek Bernd, Gondos Adam, Brenner Hermann
Hamburg Cancer Registry, Authority for Health and Consumer Protection, Hamburg, Germany.
Population Based Cancer Registry Bavaria, Registry Office, Erlangen, Germany.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;38(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
Cancer care services including cancer prevention activities are predominantly localised in central cities, potentially causing a heterogeneous geographic access to cancer care. The question of an association between residence in either urban or rural areas and cancer survival has been analysed in other parts of the world with inconsistent results. This study aims at a comparison of age-standardised 5-year survival of cancer patients resident in German urban and rural regions using data from 11 population-based cancer registries covering a population of 33 million people.
Patients diagnosed with cancers of the most frequent and of some rare sites in 1997-2006 were included in the analyses. Places of residence were assigned to rural and urban areas according to administrative district types of settlement structure. Period analysis and district type specific population life tables were used to calculate overall age-standardised 5-year relative survival estimates for the period 2002-2006. Poisson regression models for excess mortality (relative survival) were used to test for statistical significance.
The 5-year relative survival estimates varied little among district types for most of the common sites with no consistent trend. Significant differences were found for female breast cancer patients and male malignant melanoma patients resident in city core regions with slightly better survival compared to all other district types, particularly for patients aged 65 years and older.
With regard to residence in urban or rural areas, the results of our study indicate that there are no severe differences concerning quality and accessibility of oncological care in Germany among different district types of settlement.
包括癌症预防活动在内的癌症护理服务主要集中在中心城市,这可能导致癌症护理在地理上的获取存在差异。世界其他地区已对城乡居住与癌症生存率之间的关联问题进行了分析,但结果并不一致。本研究旨在利用来自11个基于人群的癌症登记处的数据,比较德国城乡地区癌症患者的年龄标准化5年生存率,这些登记处覆盖了3300万人口。
分析纳入了1997 - 2006年期间被诊断患有最常见及一些罕见部位癌症的患者。根据行政区的定居结构类型将居住地划分为农村和城市地区。采用时期分析和特定地区类型的人口生命表来计算2002 - 2006年期间总体年龄标准化的5年相对生存估计值。使用泊松回归模型(用于超额死亡率(相对生存))来检验统计学显著性。
对于大多数常见部位,5年相对生存估计值在不同地区类型之间差异不大,没有一致的趋势。对于居住在城市核心地区的女性乳腺癌患者和男性恶性黑色素瘤患者,发现了显著差异,与所有其他地区类型相比,其生存率略高,尤其是65岁及以上的患者。
关于城乡居住情况,我们的研究结果表明,在德国不同定居地区类型之间,肿瘤护理的质量和可及性没有严重差异。